similar to: Automounting (hotplug) with HAL on CentOS 5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As some of you might have noticed, CentOS 5 doesn't ship with hotplug (linux-hotplug.sourceforge.net). Things get handled directly by HAL, as far as I can tell. This is ok as long as you are using gnome/kde. However, on a TUI box, or when you are running another WM (I use IceWM here), you can't count o HAL. Actually, HAL (as shipped on CentOS

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Up until now, I have been using drbd for file custers with great success. Yes, it is a PITA, and sometimes you can get annoying sincronization issues (mostly on lab situations). Now I have been considering giving gnbd (with cs/gfs) a try. Do any of you ever crossed this path ? Any comparisons or comments ? TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Has anyone here had any experience with D-Link's quad-port ethernet NIC, model DFE-580TX ? The people from Mikrotik says it can cause systemwide lockup, but from what I have been reading around, this board seem to work ok. This is the only quad-port NIC I have found with a reasonable price, so I'm seriously considering using it. Comments ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In case you have been living in an underground security cave lately. (For the lazy ones, this was RHEL 5). http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;306842912;fp;4194304;fpid;1;pf;1 http://www.niap-ccevs.org/cc%2Dscheme/st/?vid=10125 - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 For those interested, the beryl packages from Fedora-Extras (FC6) will install cleanly and run perfectly on CentOS 5. For it running here on a Duron 1600, 512MB RAM and GForce 4 MX440. Snappy as it gets. Best regards, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill &

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone else using CFS on CentOS 4.4 ? I have started using it today (unimportant stuff for now, for testing), and am wondering what are other people experiences with it. I'm using version 1.4.1, rpms kindly provided by Karan on his repository. My main concern is data loss, not security itself. From what I noticed, the strenght of CFS crypto is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There is a nasty bug on samba, up to 3.0.10, which causes Excel to incorrectly think a file was changes by someone else. This is a know issue, fixed on samba 3.0.11 (stock). A patch was also applied to samba on RHEL 3, but was NOT on RHEL 4. This patch (samba-3.0.9-excel.patch) will apply cleanly on samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9, and build without a glinch.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Do we have the ntfs kernel module (readyonly is ok) prebuilt avaliable anywhere for the stock CentOS 4.(0|1) kernel ? Any other options ? Maybe some userspace tool. TIA, - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Keywords: slmodem, linmodem, amr, slamr, winmodem Okey, just posting this for future reference, in case someone tries to search the list on this subject. To have slmodemd working on CentOS 4.1 (not sure about ver 4), all that is needed is to edit the file drivers/amrmo_init.c, replacing every instance of KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,10) to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Anyone having any luck getting Inkscape to run and/or compile ? []s - -- Rodrigo Barbosa <rodrigob at suespammers.org> "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just like to report that exim is still working fine after the upgrade :) Sorry, bad joke. But it is 5am and I'm still working, so pardon me. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum viditur" "Be excellent to each other ..." - Bill & Ted (Wyld Stallyns) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have seen a weird problem in one of my clients. The reported that when issuing a smbmount command (both client and server are CentOS 4.4), it would take up to 30 second for the mount to complete. To make a long history short, by using strace and the source, I noticed smbmnt is first calling mount() using ascii options for *data. Then that would

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have been trying to access my Nokia 6230 using a DKU-2 data cable from CentOS, with some weird results. Interesting thing is that I have VMWare installed on this machine and, if I install the Nokia Suite inside it, it can access the phone without problems. So all hardware related parts are working. Anyway, kernel load the cdc_acm module, and gives

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Okey, here is something interesting. So I finished downloading all CentOS 4.4 images (CDs and DVD) before anything else. Now I have the dvd iso mounted (-o loop), and changed CentOS-Base.repo so the [base] repo will point to it. # yum update Boom! Yum tries to use the [update] repository (not local) to upgrade to 4.4. What I ended up doing is: #

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I think most people here use BIND as their DNS server of choise. I just happen to have updated DLZ patch for the current bind version. DLZ patch allows you to use mysql (pgsql, ldap etc) as a backend for zone storage. I make no garantees, of course, but if anyone is interested on the patch (with or without the specfile for rpm building), please let

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 This seems to be an old problem, but I haven't found much about it. SuSE mentions "hwprobe=-pci" but, as far as I know, CentOS doesn't use it. This does stop the machine from booting (mounting /) quite a few times. Logs: SCSI subsystem initialized sym0: <895> rev 0x2 at pci 0000:00:13.0 irq 177 sym0: Symbios NVRAM, ID 7,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have so far avoided using the x86_64 distro, sticking to 32 bits on all my servers. My question for all using the 64bits distro is: is it really worth it ? What kind of applications are you running, and what kind of _real_ gain did you have ? Note: All my servers are 2GB RAM or less. - -- Rodrigo Barbosa "Quid quid Latine dictum sit, altum

On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 16:05:00 +0100, Lentes, Bernd wrote: > Hi, > > i'm playing a bit around with vcpus. > My guest is Windows 10 1903. > This is the excerpt from the config: > ... > <vcpu placement='static' current='2'>4</vcpu> > <vcpus> > <vcpu id='0' enabled='yes' hotpluggable='no'/> >

Hi, i'm playing a bit around with vcpus. My guest is Windows 10 1903. This is the excerpt from the config: ... <vcpu placement='static' current='2'>4</vcpu> <vcpus> <vcpu id='0' enabled='yes' hotpluggable='no'/> <vcpu id='1' enabled='yes' hotpluggable='yes'/> <vcpu id='2'

----- On Feb 15, 2020, at 12:47 AM, Marc Roos M.Roos@f1-outsourcing.eu wrote: > Would you mind sharing your xml? I have strange high host load on idle > windows guest/domain <domain type='kvm'> <name>pathway</name> <uuid>8235e5ae-0756-4286-5407-9fa02d372046</uuid> <description>Pathway Studio Dietrich</description> <memory