similar to: Use of CentOS logo on another wiki

> I think Philipp raised an interesting question, as I was also > willing to use the logo as a basis for a community site logo. > > This makes me ask a more general question on Intellectual Property : > Xen''s source code is clearly under GPL, but logo, > documentation and even the yet-to-be-official wiki have no > mention of licence, owner nor of usage rights

Hi all: Since our designer friend Tuomas Kuosmanen (tigert) already did the hard work of specifying the CentOS logo colors in HEX, Pantone, and CMYK ... I did the small step of adding them to the wiki. This might be useful for you all to know it's now there: https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo#logo-colors Also, I put a link back to the trademark guidelines for questions that are

Dear R Developers, I create this e-mail, linked to "Collaborative Wiki for fostering Open Innovation in R", for going straight into the point: After studing multiple wikies (Confluence, xwiki, Mediawiki) for a collaborative approach to R Documentation, I finally came up that Mediawiki was the best for managing documentation for being: - 100% Open Source. - Simple, tidy, neat

Im curious ? When I click on the logo in upper left corner on wiki.centos.org then I get to the wiki frontpage, not the www.centos.org page!?! This is a bit redundant IMHO, I already have the "frontpage" menu, but there is no way to navigate back to www from the wiki as I can see. And thats the beaviour on http://bugs.centos.org/main_page.php, click on logo gets you back to www.

Dear R Developers, I am writing in order to open a constructive debate whether if it is worth it that R Project adopts the Apache Software Foundation & Wikipedia Model for Open Documentation by using a Collaborative Wiki & Document Store (As a complement to Bugzilla and Mailing Lists), for fostering collaboration in R Development. The objective would be to promote innovation and

> On 2/26/2016 07:37, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > > 1_ At the bottom-center, of each wiki page, there used to be a: > > "This page has been accessed 'N' times." > > > > message, in which 'N' was a number that (I think) comes from setting: > > > > $wgDisableCounters = true; > > It is there, now. Sorry, but due to MediaWiki

Recently the Syslinux wiki was updated, currently using a newer version of mediawiki. "Pre-formatted" text in the Syslinux wiki is frequently being used to display commands or configuration entries. The default behavior of pre-formatted text used to be non-wrapped (among other characteristics), whereas the current default behavior is that pre-formatted text is being wrapped (just

On 5/17/2017 11:26 AM, Adam Shostack wrote: > Also, procmail is way out of date, no longer maintained, and there are > "semi" known vulnerabilities that haven't been fixed. See > http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-ports&m=141634350915839&w=2 & the > wikipedia page. What alternatives exist for server-side filtering into folders? Is there anything as powerful?

Hello, I have a naked mediawiki running, from http://wikipedia.sourceforge.net/ The wiki is here: http://wiki.rettc.com Let me know what you think, and if it will be suitable for populating with FAQ stuffs. Alex http://www.rettc.com

Karsten, On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > Thanks Rich for drawing this forward, I had missed it. (I generally > handle all the trademark usage queries.) > > The key reference is this one, the trademark guidelines: > > https://www.centos.org/legal/trademarks/ > > That document should give the GNOME project all of the

Hi all, There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME Project's use with GNOME Boxes. I am still pursuing resolving this within the guidelines, that will take more time. Best regards, - Karsten On 10/16/2018 07:10 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: > People, > > On Wed, 2018-09-19 at 09:28

Karsten, On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 10:06 PM Karsten Wade <kwade at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > There is now a draft permission letter working it's way through the > CentOS Board. It is intended to cover permission for just the GNOME > Project's use with GNOME Boxes. This is *really* good news! > > I am still pursuing resolving this within the

On 18/11/14 00:18, Christian Costa wrote: > Hi Valeria, > > Very nice logo! Nice job! I like the ideas and the font. :) > Just few remarks about the visual appearance: > - A horizontally centered penguin would be better as the left part of > the "n" appears thiner than the right one > - The bottom line of the "e" appears a little short to me > >

Albert Graef wrote: > Chris Lattner wrote: >> I'm happy to announce that Apple has agreed to let llvm.org (and >> anyone else) use the great LLVM logo they designed for WWDC. If >> you're interested, you can see the full version of the logo on this >> page: >> http://llvm.org/Logo.html > > Looks cool! > > I'm awful at this kind of

El 18/9/18 a las 20:07, Karsten Wade escribi?: > On 09/18/2018 11:03 AM, Fabiano Fid?ncio wrote: >> My understanding is that we can use all the CentOS marks provided here[0]. >> However, those unfortunately are not looking good enough on Boxes and >> we'd like to use, if possible, just the logo as in here[1] >> >> Would that be possible? As far as I could

Hello, All: What facilities exist for plots and tables of data in the standard MediaWiki software beyond the obvious standards? The standard MediaWiki tables and graphics capabilities seem to me to be rather clumsy, and I wonder if I'm missing some available extensions? The standard MediaWiki tables are described in a Wikipedia article on "Help:Table".

Bumping this thread in the hopes that we can get an official opinion from someone on the board. In particular, the guidelines at https://wiki.centos.org/ArtWork/Brand/Logo seem to indicate that we're not supposed to use the logo without the wordmark, but we do that all the time, even on official swag. What's the official ruling, and who can we go to for further clarification? --Rich

On 17.11.2014 21:55, Martin Peres wrote: > I would like to address here the "BSD not wanted" argument that seems to > be implied by having a Penguin in the logo: > - Nouveau does not currently run on any other kernel but Linux. I know > that the BSDs are interested in porting Nouveau to their OS and I'm > happy they are doing so, but I do not think any real development

I''ve installed MediaWiki at http://xen.terrabox.com/mediawiki/ I''m slowly moving things over, but if anyone else dislikes the phpWiki interface, feel free to jump in and have fun. :) Once all of the information has been copied over I''ll move MediaWiki into the root directory. Thanks! -- ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is

On 3/11/2016 08:36, Ady via Syslinux wrote: > [...] > Thank you for taking care of the other issues in the wiki. You're welcome. I'm sorry that there appear to be additional concerns. Some of these are certainly more relevant in MediaWiki fora, as you've already acknowledged. You haven't specifically asked me, but having had some involvement with it, I will type: I can