similar to: Adding support for S7 to base R

On 18/02/2023 9:51 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote: > One more comment: > > The utils::setBreakpoint() function should be updated to be able to set > breakpoints in S7 methods, or a substitute function should be added to > the S7 package. > > RStudio 2022.12.0+353 (not sure if that's the latest) also needs to be > taught how to do that, since it doesn't seem to use

One more comment: The utils::setBreakpoint() function should be updated to be able to set breakpoints in S7 methods, or a substitute function should be added to the S7 package. RStudio 2022.12.0+353 (not sure if that's the latest) also needs to be taught how to do that, since it doesn't seem to use setBreakpoint. Duncan Murdoch

I don't know if this is the right forum, but I'd like to ask an open-ended question about the goals of the S7 OOP system, which is, where do we see the ultimate future of object-oriented programming in R being? Do we see S7 eventually complementing S3 and S4 in "base" (in quotes because S4 is provided by the methods package), or do we see (or even wish?) for S7 to supplant both

Hi! I hope you don?t mind me posting this call for participation - I do think the matter at hand is very important for the people on this list, and the people on this list are very important for the matter at hand. For historical reasons, the native API provided by R for use by applications and packages is not as concise and consistent as is could be, and is tied into the internals of the

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks a lot for reviewing this huge assembly function! silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_c()'s kernel part is for( n = 0; n < length; n++ ) { tmp1_QS = silk_LSHIFT32( (opus_int32)input[ n ], QS ); /* Loop over allpass sections */ for( i = 0; i < order; i++ ) { /* Output of allpass section */ tmp2_QS = silk_SMLAWB(

This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to complexity parameter. It's hard to get a universal function to handle all these orders efficiently. Any suggestions? Thanks, Linfeng On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Linfeng, > > On 06/02/17 02:51 PM,

Hi Jean-Marc, Thanks for your suggestions. Will get back to you once we have some updates. Linfeng On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 5:47 PM, Jean-Marc Valin <jmvalin at jmvalin.ca> wrote: > Hi Linfeng, > > On 06/02/17 07:18 PM, Linfeng Zhang wrote: > > This is a great idea. But the order (psEncC->shapingLPCOrder) can be > > configured to 12, 14, 16, 20 and 24 according to

Hi. I use Samba 3.0.2-29 on Server S7. In our network is a W2K Server named S4 running in Native Mode, Domain Name hel.lan. I tried to join the S4-Domain hel.lan. s7:~ # kinit Administrator@HEL.LAN Administrator@HEL.LAN's Password: s7:~ # net ads join [2004/02/27 08:20:54, 0] libads/ldap.c:ads_add_machine_acct(1006) Host account for s7 already exists - modifying old account Using short

I attached a new patch with small cleanup (disassembly is identical as the last patch). We have done the same internal testing as usual. Also, attached 2 failed temporary versions which try to reduce code size (just for code review reference purpose). The new patch of silk_warped_autocorrelation_FIX_neon() has a code size of 3,228 bytes (with gcc). smaller_slower.c has a code size of 2,304

On 30 Jul 2014, at 21:29, Ulrich Weigand wrote: > The ELFv1 ABI is used on 64-bit big-endian Linux and AIX. There's one small difference between the two: with the 64 bit ELFv1/ SVR4 ABI, tail padding for structs passed by value is only performed in case the struct is larger than 8 bytes, while for AIX 64 bit it's always done. As an aside, on Darwin/ppc64 it's done if the

On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:41:54 +0100 Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: > Anybody trying S7 examples and see if they work w/o producing > wrong warnings? It looks like this is not applicable to S7. If I overwrite as.data.frame with a newly created S7 generic, it fails to dispatch on existing S3 classes: new_generic('as.data.frame', 'x')(factor(1)) #

Thank Jean-Marc! The speedup percentages are all relative to the entire encoder. Comparing to master, this optimization patch speeds up fixed-point SILK encoder on NEON as following: Complexity 5: 6.1% Complexity 6: 5.8% Complexity 8: 5.5% Complexity 10: 4.0% when testing on an Acer Chromebook, ARMv7 Processor rev 3 (v7l), CPU max MHz: 2116.5 Thanks, Linfeng On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:02 AM,

>>>>> Ivan Krylov >>>>> on Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:17:38 +0300 writes: > On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:41:54 +0100 > Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >> Anybody trying S7 examples and see if they work w/o producing >> wrong warnings? > It looks like this is not applicable to S7. If I overwrite >

>>>>> Martin Maechler >>>>> on Fri, 15 Mar 2024 11:24:22 +0100 writes: >>>>> Ivan Krylov >>>>> on Thu, 14 Mar 2024 14:17:38 +0300 writes: >> On Thu, 14 Mar 2024 10:41:54 +0100 >> Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote: >>> Anybody trying S7 examples and see if they work

The following dummy data frame has factor Q (with 2 levels) nesting factor P (with levels p1 and p2 nested under q1, and p3 and p4 nested under q2), but both crossing the random variate s, which has 8 levels. The dependent measure is dv. > # The data frame: > testnest dv s P Q 1 1 s1 p1 q1 2 2 s2 p1 q1 3 1 s3 p1 q1 4 2 s4 p1 q1 5 1 s5 p1 q1 6 3 s6 p1 q1 7 3 s7

Hello R-friends, i have a question to the "text"-function. a little test-dataset for better understanding: -the dataset was imported with read.table(....,header=TRUE) s1-s10 are the samplenames var1 var2 var3 s1 1 1 2 s2 2 3 1 s3 2 2 3 s4 5 4 3 s5 4 2 3 s6 6 3 2 s7 8 5 4 s8 7 2 1 s9 9 3 2

Hi, ABCRegister.td : def SGPR32 : RegisterClass<"ABC", [i32], 16, (add S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14, S15 )>; def SFGPR32 : RegisterClass<"ABC", [f32], 16, (add S0, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, S11, S12, S13, S14, S15 )>; ===== Instruction selection ends: ... t8: i32 = ADDrr t37, t32

> ? Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:33:17 -0700 > Herv? Pag?s <hpages.on.github at gmail.com> ?????: > > The acrobatics that as.data.frame.factor() is going thru in order to > > recognize a direct call don't play nice if as.data.frame() is an S4 > > generic: > > ??? df <- as.data.frame(factor(11:12)) > > > > ???

After some thought, I decided r-devel was probably the best of the R lists for this item. Do feel free to share, as the purpose is to improve documentation and identify potential issues. John Nash The R Consortium has awarded some modest funding for "histoRicalg", a project to document and transfer knowledge of some older algorithms used by R and by other computational systems. These

Hi, I need construct box plot graph, but I want keep Groups order karla = data.frame( Groups = factor(rep(c('CPre','SPre','C7','S7','C14','S14','C21','S21'), 11)), Time = rep(c(0,7,14,21), 11), Resp = valor ) boxplot(Resp~Groups, order=T) doesn't work. How do this? -------------------------------------- Silvano Cesar da