Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Evaluation of the Samba-tools rename functionality"
2019 Jun 21
3
Group policy broken
Hello,
I using Samba 4.10.4-Debian and Samba work as Active Directory. All work
ok, until I try apply GPO to specific security group with guide on link
http://www.rebeladmin.com/2018/04/group-policy-security-filtering/ .
After modify GPO I got error:
root at dc1:~# samba-tool gpo list user5
ERROR(runtime): uncaught exception - Badly formed gPLink ' '
? File
2019 May 16
5
GPO-Error
Hello,
I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user,
listing all GPOs is working:
------------------
root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall
GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
display name : Default Domain Policy
path :
\\example2.net\sysvol\example2.net\Policies\{31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
dn :
2020 Jul 22
1
Migrate GPO policies does not work properly.
Hi!
Sorry my late answer. I did run the sysvolcheck/reset commands and
everything seems fine.
On my server I use the following rpm packages, installed from the
tranquil.it repository.
ldb-tools.x86_64 2.0.10-1.el7?????????????????? @samba_custom
libldb.x86_64?????????????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom
libldb-devel.x86_64???????????????? 2.0.10-1.el7 @samba_custom
2019 May 16
1
GPO-Error
Ok, so yesterday it worked.
Can you run this for me and mail me the output, i have a quick check.
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh
And
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-check-db-repl.sh
Last, have you check for corrupted filesystem and/or file/folders?
Any updates done last days?
Now maybe, just maybe, and this
2015 Feb 13
1
GPO set link contaniter
>I created a gpo with samba-tool, but I want to assign to a OU, the GPO that I created earlier,
>I guess I need to use the command, samba-tool gpo SetLink. How the command is used?
>I tried the following way:
> samba-tool gpo setLink OU=People,DC=dominio,DC=pdc,DC=cu cn_GPO
> But it did not work
> Throws the following exception Badly formed gpLink
2019 May 16
0
GPO-Error
On 16/05/2019 09:00, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the following error when checking for GPOs for a single user,
> listing all GPOs is working:
> ------------------
>
> root at tn2-debian1:~# samba-tool gpo listall
> GPO : {31B2F340-016D-11D2-945F-00C04FB984F9}
> display name : Default Domain Policy
> path :
>
2019 Jun 21
0
Group policy broken
Hai Ivan,
Base on the example link.
The users/computer impersonat "SYSTEM" to apply the GPO these days.
So i think your missing SYSTEM somewhere.
I have myself on such GPO objects only "apply GPO" set on a security group.
But in the resulting GPO, SYSTEM is shown also.
And you could run : samba-tool ntacl sysvolreset
See if that helps also.
Greetz,
Louis
2019 May 16
0
GPO-Error
Hai Stefan,
What is the samba version your running now?
Im now at 4.10.3 with my DC's and the command :
samba-tool gpo list username
Then it does show the GPO's for the user.
If you on 4.10, check if these are installed :
ii python3 3.5.3-1 amd64 interactive high-level object-oriented language (default python3 version)
ii
2019 May 26
3
GPO problem ACL permission
On 26/05/2019 19:24, Epsilon Minus via samba wrote:
> i don't know if the problem with the command samba-tool gpo aclcheck
> is connect with the original problem, but is necesary resolv all
> warinings.
>
> I put de log level = 5 to check the report.
>
> this is the output:
>
>
> root at DC04:~# samba-tool gpo aclcheck
Try it like this:
samba-tool gpo aclcheck
2005 Nov 01
1
OU vs. Default CN?
I am having a hard time getting any information from this list about the
default OU's used when running the net ads join command.
After mapping to the wrong OU in Active Directory for a Samba Domain
Member Server (ou=wrong_container,dc=server,dc=com) I cannot change this
back to the default (cn=users,dc=server,dc=com). Any help is
appreciated and here is the result of net ads dn command:
2020 Jul 20
2
Migrate GPO policies does not work properly.
Hi,
I migrated from my the main domain controller.I use Centos 7 server with
tranquilrepository.
The destination server is a test enviorement with different domain name
but the same system specifications.
I can browse the sysvol network share without any problem.
If i want to check the sam.ldb file on the test server I got these errors.
WARNING:Module [samba_dsdb] not found - do you need to
2020 Jul 20
0
Migrate GPO policies does not work properly.
Hi Robert,
Le 20/07/2020 ? 13:28, Csorba R?bert via samba a ?crit?:
> Hi,
>
> I migrated from my the main domain controller.I use Centos 7 server
> with tranquilrepository.
>
> The destination server is a test enviorement with different domain
> name but the same system specifications.
>
> I can browse the sysvol network share without any problem.
>
> If i want
2024 Nov 06
2
samba support of KB5020276 workaround
Hi everybody,
since a couple of years, user X can't join a computer to AD if the
computer object has been created by user Y.
It is KB5020276?Netjoin: Domain join hardening changes [1].
The documentation suggests a workaround, basically a group policy
applied to all the domain controllers.
Is it that possibile to apply group policies to a samba DC?
The group policy I'm talking about
2024 Nov 06
0
samba support of KB5020276 workaround
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> since a couple of years, user X can't join a computer to AD if the
>> computer object has been created by user Y.
>
> Why pre-create the computer object before the join ?
hi Rowland,
in order to place it in the correct ou (unless I am mistaken. Is it
possible to specify the target ou during the join? In my memory it was not.)
> The
2024 Nov 06
0
samba support of KB5020276 workaround
> I?ve spent a lot of time working on this. There?s no workaround that actually works.
>
> The machine account must me deleted and recreated by the new user. I use a generic user to own these new account so I keep it even if the employee adding machines leaves.
>
> LP
thank you a lot: you're saving me a lot of time!
Francesco
2006 Oct 22
3
Keeping DRY - I like a simple life!
Hi,
I''m new to Ruby and Rails and I would be very grateful for some advice.
I''ve got the following code.
class Foo < ActiveRecord::Base
include Versionable # Some methods to handle my versioned objects
has_many :versions, :class_name => "FooVersion", :foreign_key =>
"parent_id"
belongs_to :curr, :class_name => "FooVersion",
2000 Jul 19
1
Followup to Rok Papez's tests
I first downloaded Vorbis about a month ago, around the time Rok Papez posted
comparisons of Ogg and Lame [*]. Here's my much rougher test on a single file.
CPU: AMD K6-233
MP3: LAME 3.70, mp3blaster 2.0b6
Ogg: Vorbize 0.6 (Xiphophorus libVorbis I 20000718), ogg123-0.1
Data set: Ministry, "The Fall" (51,955,724 byte WAV)
* * *
Ogg Vorbis command line:
time vorbize -v -w
2019 Jul 25
2
Possible problems with AD Schema in Samba 4
Hi,
I found that the base of Samba 4 DC is different from the base of Windows
Server 2008 DC. There are many mistakes when I make the comparison as the
result as follows (only parts of reult):
samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://WINDC1 ldap://SAMBA4-DC -Uadministrator
Password for [EMPRESA\administrator]:
* Comparing [DOMAIN] context...
* DN lists have different size: 1787 != 1788
* DNs found only in
2017 Mar 23
4
[Samba 4.5] Very slow LDAP Queries (almost unusable), performance tunning ?
Are use using zarafaAccount=1 withing the search filters?
I use this things like this :
(&(objectClass=person)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s)))
Or for groups.
(&(objectclass=group)(zarafaAccount=1)(|(mail=%s)(otherMailbox=%s)))
That helps a lot.
! If you switch to kopano beware to change the SCHEMA and filters
zarafaAccount changed to kopanoAccount
Greetz.
Louis
2007 Feb 23
2
bug with boolean query evaluation containing parenthesis and NOT ?
Hi,
The following [simplified] query works well, however a variation which
includes parenthesis seems to fail, in that it returns hits which should
be excluded by the NOT term.
This is surprising because in this simple case, the parenthesis
shouldn''t change the Boolean evaluation ... any pointers?
Working Query: field1:value1 AND NOT field2:value2
Failing Query: field1:value1 AND