similar to: Regarding Glusterfs file locking

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:23 PM Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > From: "Tanya Lattner via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > > > Some back story here. I have gotten many requests through email and > > at the developer meetings about having a Code of Conduct and > > specifically having one for LLVM Developer Meetings. It has been

On 2015-04-04, Bill Maltby (C4B) <centos4bill at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:12 +0100, Nux! wrote: >> 100% with Digimer here. <snip> > >> All this energy should be put into contributing towards to the >> project, testing, helping out community. > > Well, I used to agree. But when a bug report filed in December goes > untouched entering

Hiya, So, what was the impetus behind having ParamsParser create Date and DateTime objects out of application/json requests? The project I''m on expects parameters to be received as standard types (bools, numbers, strings, arrays, and hashes). Rails shouldn''t try to convert objects that are explicitly passed as these types; it should be up to the application to do that.

> > Well, I used to agree. But when a bug report filed in December goes > untouched entering April, which I don't recall happening prior to RH > subsuming the project, it takes away impetus to ever file one again from > lowly end users like me I think. It appears that you are the only one to have encountered this bug. Within any project, open source or proprietary; problems

On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > With git, I normally issue a pull request, but in LLVM, this won't > work. Is there a FAQ/doc/manual on how to do that or what are the best > practices when working with git? Basically, once you are set up with git-svn (see

Why can the local and remote paths be sanitized? Regards, Uri > On Jul 31, 2020, at 19:57, Ethan Rahn <ethan.rahn at gmail.com> wrote: > > ?I wanted to bring this up again due to: > https://github.com/cpandya2909/CVE-2020-15778/. This showcases a clear > issue with scp which it sounds like cannot be fixed without breaking scp. > This seems like it would lend some impetus

Hi Dave, To confirm - I have no plans to remove MCJIT. I don't want to change any >> behavior for existing clients. The new stuff is opt-in. >> > > Why not? We did work to remove the legacy JIT in favor of MCJIT for the > usual reasons (less code/maintenance burden/etc) - it'd seem unfortunate to > then go back to maintaining two JITs again. > > You mention

On Jan 31, 2012, at 6:16 AM, Clemens Hammacher wrote: > This is because each module contains its own type table with all the types used in that module. When reading in the corresponding bitcode, the BitcodeReader explicitly calls StructType::create, without looking up in the context whether an equivalent type (even with the same name) already exists. > So I think that llvm is behaving

Folks, I *suggest* that little or no reply to this is warranted. It's just the statements of an old fart trying to make a (slightly) better environment for all of us. These thoughts are offered for consideration and use as you see fit. For some, "Hey, that'll work for me too" is the hoped for result. No discussion is intended or warranted, IMO. If you recognize yourself in

Hi Chris, thanks for your answer! On 2/2/12 1:15 AM, Chris Lattner wrote: > The linker has to solve the exact same problem (read multiple .bc files and unify types across them). This is the impetus behind TypeMapTy in lib/Linker/LinkModules.cpp. You'll probably need to do something like that. I already looked into that. The linker is using the GlobalValues of both modules to identify

DAX is explained in detail here: https://lwn.net/Articles/610174/ This patch adds support to supermin for using a DAX root filesystem. The corresponding libguestfs patches will be posted shortly once I've tested them a bit more. This requires qemu >= 2.6. Unfortunately it's not really a win for a few reasons: - Requires enabling ACPI, which slows everything down by hundreds of

I'm afraid I am stumped, and need some help or pointers. Ever since I've "upgraded" my Win2k boxes to SP4, I've been unable to print to Samba-shared printers (on Solaris and Freebsd). Originally I was running the current 2.2.x, and figured trying to diagnose the problem would provide an impetus for trying 3.0, which I have from beta3 through RC1. That bit of history is

Hello Everyone, I have a few users that are complaining about the "slowness" of copying files to and saving files directly to the Samba server. From my own recollections, the speed is rather identical to the speed we experienced on our old Windows NT 4.0 fileserver. One thing that could be the impetus of this issue is that Samba is serving up files, for opening and copying from the

Hi Bilal, if you're looking for Asterisk, CRM and even Google Contacts integration, do check out Aptus FonB (www.aptus.com). I believe that's the exact solution you're looking for. Br, Maax __________________________________________________________________ Hi; I used vicidial for call center and I would like to try elastix. Can someone advise about the advantages? Does Elastix

On Jun 26, 2019, at 9:02 AM, Andrew Kelley via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 6/24/19 6:23 PM, Siva Chandra via llvm-dev wrote: >> Within Google, we have a growing range of needs that existing libc >> implementations don't quite address. >> To be very clear: we don't expect our needs to exactly match everyone >> else's -- part of our

On 01/14/2015 02:33 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Lang Hames <lhames at gmail.com > <mailto:lhames at gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > To confirm - I have no plans to remove MCJIT. I don't want > to change any behavior for existing clients. The new stuff > is opt-in. >

On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, Red Cricket wrote: > I have had this in my .bashrc for years: > > alias scp='rsync -avzP' Similar, though I named it rcp because nobody has the real rcp installed any more, but sometimes I need scp to connect to systems that lack rsync. https://evolvis.org/plugins/scmgit/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=shellsnippets/shellsnippets.git;a=blob;f=mksh/rcp;hb=HEAD >

Ah, I see -- the registers left out of the mask are considered clobbered. Got it! At a high level, I'm interested in finding the locations of all values that are live at a given call site. You can think of it like a debugger, e.g. gdb -- I'd like to be able to unwind the stack, frame by frame, and locate all the live values for each function invocation (i.e., where they are in a

Hi, I need some information on DID and Callback. Please read-on: Question on DID (User1 Calling User2 via normal Telephone line and sending its CLI: Connectivity is as below: User1 ==PSTN==> DigiumE1/Asterisk1 ==INTERNET==> DigiumE1/Asterisk2 ==PSTN==> User2 1. Can User1 make a single stage call to User2 via Asterisk1? Currently User1 is able call User2 on Two Stage basis (Asterisk

My apology if this question has been asked. My question is: Can security/access be restricted or established on a WIN share (UX to WIN) on a user level? Or what type of security feature is available and how granular? ------------------------------------- Rafi Sheikh