similar to: dyn.load(now = FALSE) not actually lazy?

Morning All! Anyone ever tried exporting a StorNext CVFS filesystem from a Linux box??? I?ve got this Samba server (3.5.6) running on CentOS 5.4 and it?s working fine, exporting ext3, nfs and an IBM GPFS filesystem just fine. So I know Samba is good an my configuration is working. I tried to add the exportation of a StorNext CVFS volume and that doesn?t work. All the other volumes still work

Howdy, I am just starting to use rsync and now have an rsync server set up to back up our various machines. I recently started getting an error that is confusing and I can't find info documented on it. I searched the news group and found it mentioned but no solution yet. I get the error when sync'ing from a Solaris 8 machine to my Solaris 8 server. stat

Hi ! As some of you might know, Apple has discontinued it's xServes server as of january 31st 2011. We have a server rack with 12 xserves ranging from dual G5's to dual quand-core xeon lastest generation, 3 xserve-raid and one activeraid 16 TB disk enclosure. We also use xSan to access a shared file system among the servers. Services are run from this shared filesystem, spreaded

Hi, we are running samba 4.4 on two machines as file servers. Both are running a GFS (stornext). The storage is attached using 8G HBA. You can get up to 800MB/s local speed. We are exporting the shares using 2x1GB and 2x10G. However the clients are only getting 40-50MB/s. With samba3 I think we had up to 80-90MB/s. Using a 100MB/s link for the client we see 12-13MB/s (wire speed). Using

? Wed, 1 Feb 2023 14:16:54 +1100 Michael Milton <ttmigueltt at gmail.com> ?????: > Is this a bug in the `dyn.load` implementation for R? If not, why is > it behaving like this? What should I do about it? On Unix-like systems, dyn.load forwards its arguments to dlopen(). It should be possible to confirm with a debugger that R passes RTLD_NOW to dlopen() when calling dyn.load(now =

Hi All, I've been asked to setup a 3d renderfarm at our office , at the start it will contain about 8 nodes but it should be build at growth. now the setup i had in mind is as following: All the data is already stored on a StorNext SAN filesystem (quantum ) this should be mounted on a centos server trough fiber optics , which in its turn shares the FS over NFS to all the rendernodes

Hullo, I'm looking for performance-tweaking of our samba server (linux, RHES4-based). Looking around on the internet I found plenty of things that stated 'the usual' things (buffer-sizes, nodelay, logging to a minimum, etc), but nothing that actually seems to work. We usually have directory structures with many thousands (up to 100k or more) of relatively small files (around 10MB

To start I wish to that you for the swift response on this issue. I do not think that I would get such a quick response from a proprietary (closed-source) company. Open Source :-). To respond to one the comments about large file systems ?recommend you split it in several smaller (2-4TB) filesystems ? This is not feasible in many situations. In some situations 2-4TB is not even a reasonable

I tried this on the IRC channel and got not response... I have a 2.2TB filesystem. The filesystem itself is a stornext (Quantum) filesystem, which in the /etc/fstab is type cvfs. When a client mounts the samba share, it only reports ~4GB (3.9 or 3.7 GB) total space. We have a third party app, which will/can not be updated which checks the disk space available and fails if it's not enough.

Hello, is your scenario possibly using Windows SMB2 clients and a large/huge number of small files per directory? If so, please have a look here and see whether my issue might apply for you as well: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2017-October/123611.html Hope this helps & best regards Andreas Am 02.11.2017 um 14:05 schrieb Dr. Peer-Joachim Koch via samba: > Hi, >

On Thu, Nov 02, 2017 at 06:57:21PM +0100, awl1 via samba wrote: > Hello, > > is your scenario possibly using Windows SMB2 clients and a > large/huge number of small files per directory? If so, please have a > look here and see whether my issue might apply for you as well: > > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2017-October/123611.html > > Hope this helps

Greetings. Is there an approved way to aggregate LUNs when using OCFS2? I have several 1TB LUNs I'd like to make into a single filesystem. Would I use something like Linux software raid? Brett

After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation and posts on this topic are rather incomplete, sometime fantasist et do not give much explanations about configure options. As I am not sure if mine is correct, I would appreciate some advices and hints. OS: Fedora 22 parallel_studio_xe_2016 Hardware : 8 Thread(s) per

Hi all, I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that? Any recommendations? Thanks in advance for any and all advice. Boris.

Hi, I?ve setup a simple ctdb cluster. Actually copied the config file from an existing system. Thats what happens: Node 1, alone Number of nodes:2 pnn:0 10.0.0.1 OK (THIS NODE) pnn:1 10.0.0.2 DISCONNECTED|UNHEALTHY|INACTIVE Generation:1369816268 Size:1 hash:0 lmaster:0 Recovery mode:NORMAL (0) Recovery master:0 Node1, after start of ctdb on Node 2 Number of nodes:2 pnn:0

On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 20:49 +0200, arnaud gaboury wrote: > On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 7:35 PM, arnaud gaboury <arnaud.gaboury at gmail.com> wrote: > > After a few days of reading and headache, I finally gave a try at > > building R from source with Intel MKL and ICC. Documentation and posts > > on this topic are rather incomplete, sometime fantasist et do not give > >

After the 7.2 upgrade?boost-openmpi-1.53.0-25 was installed, along with?openmpi-1.10.0-10. ?The old openmpi was then replaced with?compat- openmpi16-1.6.4-10. ?All fine. Except boost-openmpi has a dependency on the old libmpi.so.1 and the new openmpi has libmpi.so.12: # ldd libboost_mpi-mt.so.1.53.0? linux-vdso.so.1 =>??(0x00007ffe8c182000) libboost_serialization-mt.so.1.53.0 =>

Hi all, I have the issue: icc -std=c99 -std=gnu11 -I../../src/extra -I../../src/extra/xdr -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -I../../src/nmath -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fopenmp -fpic -g -O3 -wd188 -ip -mp -c eval.c -o eval.o arithmetic.c(66): warning #274: declaration is not visible outside of function int matherr(struct exception *exc) ^

Note that 'intel 2022' is a bit vague. The current version is 2023.1.0, and that has both the 'classic' (icc/icpc/ifort which it seems you used) and new (icx/ixpx/ifx) compilers -- the former are said to be going to be discontinued later this year. R did not know about ifx so did not build with the new set. The parts of the manual Tomas referred to were about the old

Did you load the compat-openmpi environment module? module load mpi/compat-openmpi16-x86_64 Tony On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > After the 7.2 upgrade boost-openmpi-1.53.0-25 was installed, along > with openmpi-1.10.0-10. The old openmpi was then replaced with compat- > openmpi16-1.6.4-10. All fine. > > Except