similar to: Need to know Samba version addressing "CVE-2018-14628" fix

On Tue, 2023-01-31 at 21:01 +0100, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > On 31.01.2023 20:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On 31/01/2023 19:14, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > I don't see any reason, that the 11025 computer account should > > > have any unix permissions on the server whatsoever. The server is > > > setup

Thank you, I've seen that commit. But even that seemed to be a STARTTLS inside a plain ldap connection (389). On Wed, Mar 8, 2023 at 6:49?PM Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 2023-03-08 at 12:58 +0000, jose.celestino--- via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have a samba installation (4.17.5) where a winbindd is part of an > > AD

On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 15:08 +0000, Tim ODriscoll via samba wrote: Unfortunately it's still erroring out: (7) mschap: Creating challenge hash with username: host/SL-6S4BBS3.MYDOMAIN.co.uk (7) mschap: Client is using MS-CHAPv2 > Is this set as a UPN (with the realm appended) on the user? I don't see any UPN's in my AD record, only SPNs - unless I misunderstand you? I've run

After realizing that people don't realize (heh) samba DC is not a regular fileserver, an idea come to me. How about building two different samba packages (on a distribution such as debian), one being a regular file server and another is just for an AD DC, and make them *co-installable*, so each has its own set of config/library/cache/runtime files? When installed together, it will be two

On 31.01.2023 20:27, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 31/01/2023 19:14, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > >> Hi Michael, >> >> I don't see any reason, that the 11025 computer account should have >> any unix permissions on the server whatsoever. The server is setup >> using Windows ACLs exclusively, no unix or posix acls or permissions

Hello, I would like to ask you for help. I have quite a big dataframe (119 313 rows), this is a part of it: "jul" "ind" "time" "secs" "geo" "act" "lig" "date.x" "clock" "h" "m" "s" "d" "mo" "y" "dtime" "land" "date.y"

Hi Adam, On 8/25/24 15:26, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which > claims to have been uploaded by you. > > I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer > version than is currently in unstable and testing: > > xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable |

Hi, I noticed that there's a xen upload in the stable-new queue, which claims to have been uploaded by you. I'm afraid that we can't accept it currently, because it is a newer version than is currently in unstable and testing: xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable | source xen | 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 | stable-debug | source xen

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: ??? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" ??? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP ??? (Administrator action required!) ??? https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-14628.html

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.19 release series. It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: ??? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" ??? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP ??? (Administrator action required!) ??? https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-14628.html

On Tue, 15 Oct 2024 14:20:02 +0400 Mariam Arutunian <mariamarutunian at gmail.com> wrote: > Package: libxen > Version: 4.17.3 > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-Cc: mariamarutunian at gmail.com > > Dear Maintainer, > A vulnerability identified as CVE-2014-4608 was discovered and fixed in LZO decompressor in the Linux kernel with the following commit:

Source: xen Version: 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1 Severity: serious Tags: patch pending sid trixie Justification: library ABI skew on upgrade User: debian-arm at lists.debian.org Usertags: time-t NOTICE: these changes must not be uploaded to unstable yet! Dear maintainer, As part of the 64-bit time_t transition required to support 32-bit architectures in 2038 and beyond

Hello, This is a job located at another division in Altran I wanted to share. We are seeking talented Data Scientists with a passion for R, software development and analytical skills and a strong academic and/or commercial background. Due to our continued growth and success, we have a number of open positions available. Even if you have not yet graduated (but are graduating in the near future),

found 988477 4.17.3+10-g091466ba55-1~deb12u1 severity 988477 critical quit Justification is same as original, data loss. I'm unsure about of the border between "data loss" and "serious data loss" is, but the original reportter declared it so and I don't disagree. On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 11:41:44PM +0200, Maximilian Engelhardt wrote: > I am changing the severity

Samba 4.17.3 on Debian 11.6 [global] unix charset = iso8859-15 security = ads realm = COMP.INTRA workgroup = COMP dedicated keytab file = /etc/krb5.keytab kerberos method = secrets and keytab winbind cache time = 10 winbind use default domain = yes winbind refresh tickets = Yes template homedir = /mnt/MSA2040/smb/Homes/%D/%U domain master = no local master = no preferred master = no idmap

Hi, to all of you which are using Synology NAS systems. With SMB-Service 4.15.9-0631 no longer shares are accessible via domain group rights from a Samba 4.17.7 domain. It seems the same error described in the following mail trails: "No longer access to shares after upgrade to 4.17.3" "File server joined to a samba domain accessed by windows 10-11 clients, works via ip no via

The only way I have found to fix that is to enable the beta updates in plugins and install the beta version of samba on the Synology. Thank you, Travis Wenks Rose City Solutions Owner [image: Rose City Skyline Logo] * Phone *503.821.7000 <3464881845> * Website *rosecitysolutions.com <https://rosecitysolutions.com> * Email * travis at rosecitysolutions.com On Thu, Apr 13, 2023

Hi Travis, I know, but this is now the released version (4.15.9-0919 beta > 4.15.9-0631), see the history page for SMB-Service: https://www.synology.com/en-us/releaseNote/SMBService?model=DS918%2B#7_x_series With the beta version it still works. But we can't stay on the beta forever I think. Regards Ingo https://github.com/WAdama Travis Wenks via samba schrieb am 13.04.2023 um 21:29:

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.18 release series. It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: ??? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" ??? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP ??? (Administrator action required!) ??? https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-14628.html

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.18 release series. It contains the security-relevant bug CVE-2018-14628: ??? Wrong ntSecurityDescriptor values for "CN=Deleted Objects" ??? allow read of object tombstones over LDAP ??? (Administrator action required!) ??? https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2018-14628.html