similar to: [Q] Veritas BMR and CentOS 3 work together error????

Thanks in advance for taking the time to read this email. I'm using rsync to make a copy of my Netbackup Catalogs to an offsite server for DRP. I have narrowed the problem down to a few sub-directories that contains 16 directories each and in each directory there are about 37 files. None of the files are larger than 300MB. In fact, most of them are around 1K-5MB. The problem is, rsync

Hello, everyone. I have the following problem with TclTk: I create some windows and want to change their position with geometry manage (sometimes they will be centered, sometimes not). If the toplevel is created and its dimensions are gathered via 'tkwinfo', I get (usually) correct values. However, if this window is created by a function (in the following example, by 'ask.format')

I am using the sink function to save several results (i.e. values of many different variables) to an output file. However, the output looks unattractive because it displays line numbers next to each new variable, it is difficult to remove the R variable name from the output, and I cannot print test without it using quotation marks. The only way I have found around most of these issues is to

So I can''t quite see how to do this in the existing syntax. Ideally there would be an onlyif parameter for packages, but that doesn''t seem to be the case. I could create a fact that returns true or false depending on whether the file exists, but that doesn''t feel like the right way to do it either. I could do something like: $file_exists =

Hello. Has this been tried by anybody? I would appreciate any practical feedback on a setup where Dovecot was clustered with Veritas software. Best regards, Dmitrij Malakhov

Hi, I''m aware that if we talking about DMP on Solaris the preferred way is to use MPxIO, still I have a question if any of you got any experience with ZFS on top of Veritas DMP? Does it work? Is it supported? Any real life experience/tests in this subject? Regards, sendai -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi all, How to dtrace a who is writing a veritas volume? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20070412/dfd8c254/attachment.html>

I'm just wondering if anyone else here is using this? The majority of jobs on our CentOS5 server "fail" by "Communications failure" right at the end, apparently on the very last file which, however, is recoverable, as is the whole archive. In more than half these failures, the Linux agent has stopped and, in about half of those, crashes leaving a backtrace. I had similar

Hi, gang, There have been numerous postings, scattered across various Internet forums (including this one), about problems encountered using Veritas Backup Exec 8.6 and higher with Samba-sourced shares from *nix servers. In my particular case, I have a Windows NT Server 4.0-based backup system, which is supposed to be able to back up the other Windows systems on the LAN, plus several SPARC boxes

Hi all, Wondering if anyone can help me here? Having just upgraded from Samba 3.0.2a to Samba 3.0.4, I've found that Veritas Backup Exec 8.6 is no longer able to browse my shares. A quick "make revert" and everything is back as it should be. The things I see in the samba log are like this: [2004/05/19 12:46:40, 1] smbd/service.c:make_connection_snum(619) titanium

I figured out a previous issue to allow you to connect veritas BE to a samba system. You basically just defind a c$ share, and it was happy (Veritas BE version 8.5 Rev 3572) Now, I cannot get the user defined share to connect for the life of me anymore. The backup user can connect using windows shares, but within the application, I'm out of luck. It keeps asking for a username/password

On Mon, Jul 03, 2000 at 02:48:59PM -0700, Richard Fox wrote: > > Running the SAMBA that is released with RedHat 6.2, Veritas Backup Exec > 8.0 does not work. However, when running the latest dev version of SAMBA > Backup Exec does work. What files were changed to fix this bug? I would > like to update what I am running without having to go to the dev version. > > I have

Hi, Need help on data recovery. Suddenly my disk device's geometry has been changed to something that doesnot make any sense. Its a 1.8TB in size and had only one single partition. Now I can see 3 partitions sde1, sde2 and sde2 of sizes 130M, 140GB and 10GB. Is there any way to recover data from these newly created disk devices? Thanks Paras.

We have some HDS storage that isn''t supported by mpxio, so we have to use veritas dmp to get multipathing. Whats the recommended way to use DMP storage with ZFS. I want to use DMP but get at the multipathed virtual luns at as low a level as possible to avoid using vxvm as much as possible. I figure theres no point in having overhead from 2 volume manages if we can avoid it. Has anyone

A few questions: 1. How does ZFS compare to Luster? 2. Is ZFS compatible with Veritas Netbackup Suite? 3. Does ZFS support bare metal restore (BMR)? Pointers welcome!! Gary -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20060214/328c6cc4/attachment.html>

Hi, I have inherited a Samba PDC running on SuSE Linux Enterprise Server 10.1 (the Samba version is 3.0.24-2.23-1296-SUSE-CODE10). The server has been giving problems for a few weeks including the following symptoms: 1. Users accessing a share are experiencing intermittent problems writing to the share (Excel tells them the file they are trying to write is read-only). 2. when I try to add a

Not as smooth an experience as I had assumed it would be after a test run with a clean install worked perfectly. So figured I would share the experience in case anybody else runs into similar situation since not all information are consolidated in a single place. Physical machine in question is a 4yr W2008R2 server (non-raided!) running custom app from defunct developer which is why I am

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 12:52 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Offsite hosted backup solutions > Can't say about Windows clients, but for all my Linux machines, I'm Hands down Veeam Endpoint Backup for Windows clients to a secure samba share.

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 12:52 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Offsite hosted backup solutions > Can't say about Windows clients, but for all my Linux machines, I'm > using Rsnapshot, either on public or LAN servers. Basically uses rsync > over SSH,

Hi Everyone ; I will soon be making a presentation comparing ZFS against Veritas Storage Foundation , do we have any document comparing features ? regards <http://www.sun.com/> http://www.sun.com/emrkt/sigs/6g_top.gif Mertol Ozyoney Storage Practice - Sales Manager Sun Microsystems, TR Istanbul TR Phone +902123352200 Mobile +905339310752 Fax +902123352222 Email