similar to: ctdb samba and winbind event problem

Hi Stefan, On Thu, 26 Jan 2023 16:35:59 +0100, Stefan Kania via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I'm having a CTDB-Cluster with two nodes (both Ubuntu wit > Sernet-packages 4.17.4). Now I want to replace one of the nodes. The > first step was to bring a new node to the CTDB-Cluster. This time a > Debian 11 but with the same sernet-packages (4.17.4). Adding the

Hi everybody, I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version 4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version 4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch. After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come back and remains in state "UNHEALTHY". I can find that in the syslog: May 16 11:25:40 ctdb-lbn1 ctdb-eventd[13184]: 50.samba: samba not listening on TCP port 445 May 16

------------------原始邮件------------------ 发件人：朱尚忠10137461 收件人：samba@lists.samba.org <samba@lists.samba.org> 日 期 ：2018年02月26日 17:10 主 题 ：[ctdb] Unable to take recovery lock - contention When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock - contention" log will be output all the time. Which cases will the "unable to take lock" errror be output? Thanks! The

When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock - contention" log will be output all the time. Which cases will the "unable to take lock" errror be output? Thanks! The following the ctdb logs: 2018/02/12 19:38:51.147959 ctdbd[5615]: CTDB starting on node 2018/02/12 19:38:51.528921 ctdbd[6602]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.6.10) as PID: 6602 2018/02/12 19:38:51.529060

On Thu, 16 Feb 2023 17:30:37 +0000, Ulrich Sibiller <ulrich.sibiller at atos.net> wrote: > Martin Schwenke schrieb am 15.02.2023 23:23: > > OK, this part looks kind-of good. It would be interesting to know how > > long the entire failover process is taking. > > What exactly would you define as the begin and end of the failover? From "Takeover run

There is a 3 nodes ctdb cluster is running. When one of 3 nodes is powered down, lots of logs will be wrote to log.ctdb. node1: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414369 ctdbd[10129]: Recovery has started 2018/09/04 04:35:06.414944 ctdbd[10129]: connect() failed, errno=111 2018/09/04 04:35:06.415076 ctdbd[10129]: Unable to run startrecovery event node2: repeat logs: 2018/09/04 04:35:09.412368

Hello, at this time i want to install a CTDB Cluster with SAMBA 4.7.7 from SOURCE! I compiled samba as follow: |./configure| |--with-cluster-support ||--with-shared-modules=idmap_rid,idmap_tdb2,idmap_ad| The whole SAMBA enviroment is located in /usr/local/samba/. CTDB is located in /usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb. I guess right that the correct path of ctdbd.conf (node file, public address file

Martin, I have checked more logs. Before ctdb-eventd went away, system memory utilization is very high, almost 100%. Is it related to "Bad talloc magic value - wrong talloc version used/mixed"? 2018/08/14 15:22:57.818762 ctdb-eventd[10131]: 05.system: WARNING: System memory utilization 95% >= threshold 80% 2018/08/14 15:22:57.818800 ctdb-eventd[10131]: 05.system: WARNING: System

Hello, i'm still trying to find out what is the right path for ctdb.conf (ubuntu 18.04, samba was compiled from source!!). When im trying to start CTDB without any config file, my log in /usr/local/samba/var/log/log.ctdb shows me: 2018/05/07 12:56:44.363513 ctdbd[4503]: Failed to read nodes file "/usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/nodes" 2018/05/07 12:56:44.363546 ctdbd[4503]: Failed to

Hi Benedikt, On Thu, 16 May 2019 10:32:51 +0200, Benedikt Kaleß via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi everybody, > > I just updated my ctdb node from Samba version > 4.9.4-SerNet-Debian-11.stretch to Samba version > 4.9.8-SerNet-Debian-13.stretch. > > After restarting the sernet-samba-ctdbd service the node doesn't come > back and remains in state

Hi, i updated the variables for my scenario. But CTDB wont start: Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 systemd[1]: Starting CTDB... Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24663]: CTDB starting on node Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.11.6) as PID: 24667 Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Created PID file /usr/local/samba/var/run/ctdb/ctdbd.pid Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Removed

When I try to enable CTDB to manage (legacy) SMB and Winbind, I get startup errors. Sep 29 22:23:06 euw2-samba-server-c21-01 ctdb-eventd[1509]: *49.winbind: Failed to start winbind* Sep 29 22:23:06 euw2-samba-server-c21-01 ctdb-eventd[1509]: *startup event failed* Sep 29 22:23:06 euw2-samba-server-c21-01 ctdbd[1507]: *startup event failed* Sep 29 22:23:11 euw2-samba-server-c21-01 ctdbd[1507]:

On 03/03/2020 09:13, Ralph Boehme via samba wrote: > Am 3/3/20 um 10:05 AM schrieb Micha Ballmann via samba: >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 systemd[1]: Starting CTDB... >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24663]: CTDB starting on node >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.11.6) as >> PID: 24667 >> Mar? 3 09:50:50 ctdb1 ctdbd[24667]: Created PID file

Hello, we are using ctdb 4.15.5 on RHEL8 (Kernel 4.18.0-372.32.1.el8_6.x86_64) to provide NFS v3 (via tcp) to RHEL7/8 clients. Whenever an ip takeover happens most clients report something like this: [Mon Feb 13 12:21:22 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:21:28 2023] nfs: server x.x.253.252 not responding, still trying [Mon Feb 13 12:22:31 2023] nfs: server

Am Montag, 26. Februar 2018, 17:26:06 CET schrieb zhu.shangzhong--- via samba: Decoded base64 encoded body with some chinese characters: ------------------原始邮件------------------ 发件人：朱尚忠10137461 收件人：samba at lists.samba.org <samba at lists.samba.org> 日 期 ：2018年02月26日 17:10 主 题 ：[ctdb] Unable to take recovery lock - contention When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock

Thanks, i added "Environment=PATH=$PATH:/usr/local/samba/bin:/bin". Needed also to add "/bin" because couldnt find "sleep". Thats the script now: ---- [Unit] Description=CTDB Documentation=man:ctdbd(1) man:ctdb(7) After=network-online.target time-sync.target ConditionFileNotEmpty=/usr/local/samba/etc/ctdb/nodes [Service]

When the ctdb is starting, the "Unable to take recovery lock - contention" log will be output all the time. Which cases will the "unable to take lock" errror be output? Thanks! The following the ctdb logs: 2018/02/12 19:38:51.147959 ctdbd[5615]: CTDB starting on node 2018/02/12 19:38:51.528921 ctdbd[6602]: Starting CTDBD (Version 4.6.10) as PID: 6602 2018/02/12 19:38:51.529060

Hi all We did some failover/failback tests on 2 nodes��A and B�� with architecture 'glusterfs + ctdb(public address) + nfs-ganesha'�� 1st: During write, unplug the network cable of serving node A ->NFS Client took a few seconds to recover to conitinue writing. After some minutes, plug the network cable of serving node A ->NFS Client also took a few seconds to recover

Thanks Martin! We are using the ctdb 4.6.10. Are you able to recreate this every time? Sometimes? Rarely? Rarely. Note that you're referring to nodes 1, 2, 3 while CTDB numbers the nodes 0, 1, 2. In fact, the situation is a little more confused than this: This is my wrong. The CTDB numbers the nodes is 0,1,2. # ctdb status Number of nodes:3 pnn:0 10.231.8.70 OK pnn:1 10.231.8.68 OK

Thanks Martin! We are using the ctdb 4.6.10. Are you able to recreate this every time? Sometimes? Rarely? Rarely. Note that you&apos;re referring to nodes 1, 2, 3 while CTDB numbers the nodes 0, 1, 2. In fact, the situation is a little more confused than this: This is my wrong. The CTDB numbers the nodes is 0,1,2. # ctdb status Number of nodes:3 pnn:0 10.231.8.67 OK pnn:1 10.231.8.65 OK