similar to: [PATCH 2/2] vhost: check for pending livepatches from vhost worker kthreads

On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 04:12:20PM -0600, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within kpatch's > timeout period due to busy vhost worker kthreads. In looking for a solution the > only answer I found was to call klp_update_patch_state() from a safe location. > I tried adding this call to vhost_worker(), and it

On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:43:55PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 03:12:35PM -0600, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:03:16PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > > On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:20, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > > > > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within

On Thu 2023-01-26 15:12:35, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 06:03:16PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:20, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > > > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within kpatch's > > > timeout period due to busy vhost worker kthreads. > > > > I have

On Fri 2023-01-20 16:12:20, Seth Forshee (DigitalOcean) wrote: > We've fairly regularaly seen liveptches which cannot transition within kpatch's > timeout period due to busy vhost worker kthreads. I have missed this detail. Miroslav told me that we have solved something similar some time ago, see https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220507174628.2086373-1-song at kernel.org/ Honestly,

Hello, Sorry I know this might be the wrong group to ask this in but I have been having a lot of trouble switching off the nvidia chip in my Macbook Pro 9,1. I have tried numerous things but there is a lot of flawed documentation out there on this. I have a pile of info (dmesg, kernel configs and etc) that I would like to submit as a bug reports but no clear place to send it. Who maintains the

Hi, I am running CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core). Does CentOS Linux kernel 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64 support kernel updates without rebooting (Live Patching)? I look forward to hearing from you and thanks in advance. Best Regards, Kaushal

On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 11:27 AM Kaushal Shriyan <kaushalshriyan at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am running CentOS Linux release 7.7.1908 (Core). Does CentOS Linux kernel > 3.10.0-1062.1.1.el7.x86_64 support kernel updates without rebooting (Live > Patching)? > > I look forward to hearing from you and thanks in advance. > > > this was just discussed in length

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37549 Summary: Dell Studio XPS 1340 - fails to enter suspend mode Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: x86 (IA32) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at

Instead of storing the map per CPU provide and use per task storage. That prepares for local kmaps which are preemptible. The context switch code is preparatory and not yet in use because kmap_atomic() runs with preemption disabled. Will be made usable in the next step. The context switch logic is safe even when an interrupt happens after clearing or before restoring the kmaps. The kmap index in

Hello, While testing Virt-SIG Xen 4.12 rpms on CentOS7 I noticed the following problem with libvirt/virt-manager when manually installing a new HVM guest from virt-manager GUI.. basicly the VM installation won't start, because libvirt/virt-manager is not able to start the VM, due to "missing" qemu-system-i386 binary: Unable to complete install: 'unsupported configuration:

Seth Forshee noticed a performance degradation with some workloads. This turns out to be due to packet drops. Euan Kemp noticed that this is because we drop all packets where length exceeds the truesize, but for some packets we add in extra memory without updating the truesize. This in turn was kept around unchanged from ab7db91705e95 ("virtio-net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for

Seth Forshee noticed a performance degradation with some workloads. This turns out to be due to packet drops. Euan Kemp noticed that this is because we drop all packets where length exceeds the truesize, but for some packets we add in extra memory without updating the truesize. This in turn was kept around unchanged from ab7db91705e95 ("virtio-net: auto-tune mergeable rx buffer size for

Hello, By having a look at 'drivers/platform/x86/apple-gmux.c', it seems its author is Seth Forshee <seth.forshee at canonical.com>. Other main contributors are Andreas Heider <andreas at meetr.de>, and Matthew Garrett <mjg at redhat.com>, among others. Pierre Moreau On 11:58 PM - Jul 26 2014, Evan Foss wrote: > Hello, > > Sorry I know this might be the

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:14:30PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have > > > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading > > >

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 04:14:30PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 11:38:52PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > > > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have > > > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading > > >

Accepted: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2018 19:38:52 +0100 Source: xen Binary: xenstore-utils xen-utils-common xen-hypervisor-common xen-doc xen-utils-4.11 xen-hypervisor-4.11-amd64 xen-system-amd64 xen-hypervisor-4.11-arm64 xen-system-arm64 xen-hypervisor-4.11-armhf xen-system-armhf libxen-dev libxenmisc4.11 libxencall1 libxendevicemodel1

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 11:20:54AM +0200, peterz at infradead.org wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:38:50AM +0200, J?rgen Gro? wrote: > > In case you don't want to do it I can send the patch for the Xen > > variants. > > I might've opened a whole new can of worms here. I'm not sure we > can/want to fix the entire fallout this release :/ > > Let me

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example: > > https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap > > which

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 12:09:42PM -0500, Seth Forshee wrote: > I'm seeing a performance regression with virtio_net that looks to have > started in 4.12-rc1. I only see it in one context though, downloading > snap packages from the Ubuntu snap store. For example: > > https://api.snapcraft.io/api/v1/snaps/download/b8X2psL1ryVrPt5WEmpYiqfr5emixTd7_1797.snap > > which