similar to: Building samba 4.17.4 on CentOS7

On 18/01/2023 14:20, Greg Dickie via samba wrote: > Hi, > > I used to build samba regularly but it's been a couple of years. I'm trying > to fix an issue with samba stock 4.10.16 on Cent7 by building latest and > seeing if it behaves the same but it looks like waf is not doing what's > expected. Simple question: should this work or is cent7 now too old and >

Hey Rowland, Thanks for the reply. I was not aware of that page but that's super helpful. Unfortunately it does not fix my problem. I think I'm missing something basic. At this point I'm just trying to rebuild the centos7 srpm. See the attached error message (configure fails). Thanks, Greg On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 9:30 AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org>

I don't think you are going to have much luck getting 4.17 working on CentOS 7. We recently moved from CentOS 7 (4.13) to Rocky Linux 8 (4.16) and the install process was much easier. On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 12:03 PM Greg Dickie via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Ok now, but did 4.10.16? I was just trying to rebuild their source RPM. > > Trying 4.17 on the command

Ok now, but did 4.10.16? I was just trying to rebuild their source RPM. Trying 4.17 on the command line (with python3) gives me: > [root at srvlxfs2 samba-4.17.4]# ./configure > Setting top to : > /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.17.4 > Setting out to : > /root/rpmbuild/BUILD/samba-4.17.4/bin > Checking for 'gcc' (C

On 18/01/2023 15:16, Greg Dickie wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > ? Thanks for the reply. I was not aware of that page but that's super > helpful. Unfortunately it does not fix my problem. I think I'm missing > something basic. At this point I'm just trying to rebuild the centos7 > srpm. See the attached error message (configure? fails). > > The attachment

On 18/01/2023 16:02, Greg Dickie wrote: > Ok now,?but did 4.10.16? I was just trying to rebuild their source RPM. OK, Samba first started using python 3 at version 4.10.0 , but you could build Samba with python 2 if you ran '.configure' and 'make' like this: 'PYTHON=python2 ./configure' 'PYTHON=python2 make' Samba 4.11.0 did not come with runtime

OK I found an account with RID 500 but it has another username. I inherited this AD from 15+ years ago. Everything looks fine, all the computer management stuff works and I can manipulate permissions and security BUT running robocopy still gives "Error 1314 Copying N TFS Security to destination Directory ********* A required privilege is not held by the client". I just noticed it does

Hi, Running samba 4.10.16 on CentOS7. It's a fileserver but with a split personality. For everything UNIX authentication is NIS (I know ;-) but for samba we authenticate to AD and all users have the same uidNumber & gidNumber as they do in NIS. This has been working fine but now I have some users who suddenly lose write access to their files, sometimes. One user has 2 workstations (1

Hey Rowland, Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for that. Thanks for your help, Greg On Sat, Oct 28, 2023 at 3:09?AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at

Administrator is a built in account in the AD. When you provisioned the domain with a password , that was Administrators password. LP On 29 Oct 2023 at 21:36 +0100, Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>, wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a linux > user called Administrator but then where will the credentials

On 18.01.2023 17:38, Greg Dickie via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Running samba 4.10.16 on CentOS7. It's a fileserver but with a split > personality. For everything UNIX authentication is NIS (I know ;-) but for > samba we authenticate to AD and all users have the same uidNumber & > gidNumber as they do in NIS. This has been working fine but now I have some > users who

Hey Rowland, Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator account instead? Thanks, Greg On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 3:30?PM Rowland Penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 15:07:56 -0400 > Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > Hi,

On 18/01/2023 16:38, Greg Dickie via samba wrote: > Hi, > > Running samba 4.10.16 on CentOS7. It's a fileserver but with a split > personality. For everything UNIX authentication is NIS (I know ;-) but for > samba we authenticate to AD and all users have the same uidNumber & > gidNumber as they do in NIS. The problem is, you shouldn't have any local users if you

On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 16:35:14 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Sorry, I'm thick. I understand why you would not want to create a > linux user called Administrator but then where will the credentials > come from? In my AD, I do not have a user called Administrator. I > guess I must have a user with RID 500 though, I'll look for

On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 16:14:52 -0400 Greg Dickie <greg at justaguy.ca> wrote: > Hey Rowland, > > Hmmm. I may have misunderstood. I don't believe it explicitly said to > do that but I took it as that. Should I create a local Administrator > account instead? > The whole idea behind the user map on a Unix domain member is to map the Domain Administrator account (RID 500)

2017-07-31 17:41 GMT+02:00 Greg Dickie via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>: > Hey guys, > > Thanks for the ideas. I made life easier for myself and just replaced the > SunOS (illumos) implementation with real samba. That works very well so > we're all good. Is it just me or is kerberos complicated? > At first, no it is not you : ) But after a while (and thanks to

Hi Rowland, Your DHCP is updating bind DLZ directly right. Are you scripted with on commit, etc or just using ddns-update-style? Thanks, Greg On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 17:08 +0000, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/02/15 16:55, Greg Dickie wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have just provisioned a new samba setup with 2 DCs running ISC DHCPd in failover and I?m trying to get it to play

Hello all, hoping someone can help me out here. I cannot get dummy interfaces on a new Cent8 build to persist across reboots. On Cent7 - this is the process I use: Create Dummies: # cat /etc/modules-load.d/dummy.conf dummy # cat /etc/modprobe.d/dummyopts.conf options dummy numdummies=4 # ip link add dummy0 type dummy ## - repeating a/ ascending dummyN adapters for as many needed # service

On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 11:53 AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On 18/01/2023 16:38, Greg Dickie via samba wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Running samba 4.10.16 on CentOS7. It's a fileserver but with a split > > personality. For everything UNIX authentication is NIS (I know ;-) but > for > > samba we authenticate to AD

Anyone have any ideas? It's rather annoying that I can't get these to persist across reboots without using some kind of helper script. On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:37 AM Frank Even <lists+centos.org at elitists.org> wrote: > > Hello all, hoping someone can help me out here. > > I cannot get dummy interfaces on a new Cent8 build to persist across reboots. > > On Cent7