similar to: Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?"

2023 Jan 17
2
Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?
Op 17-01-2023 om 13:49 schreef Peter Milesson via samba: > Hi folks, > > Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? > > The AD DCs, the workstations and the Samba member server are on the > same network segment. As the member server only serves files to the > local network, I assume that neither gateway, nor default route are > necessary. For
2023 Jan 17
1
Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?
On 17.01.2023 14:54, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > Op 17-01-2023 om 13:49 schreef Peter Milesson via samba: >> Hi folks, >> >> Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? >> >> The AD DCs, the workstations and the Samba member server are on the >> same network segment. As the member server only serves files to the >>
2023 Jan 17
2
Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?
On 17/01/2023 12:49, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? I would have thought they were mandatory on any computer, never mind Samba. > > The AD DCs, the workstations and the Samba member server are on the same > network segment. As the member server only serves files to the local > network, I
2023 Jan 17
2
Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?
On 17/01/2023 13:13, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > Op 17-01-2023 om 14:02 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: >> >> >> On 17/01/2023 12:49, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? >> >> I would have thought they were mandatory on any computer, never
2023 Jan 17
1
Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?
Am 17.01.23 um 14:54 schrieb Kees van Vloten via samba: > Op 17-01-2023 om 13:49 schreef Peter Milesson via samba: >> Hi folks, >> >> Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? >> >> The AD DCs, the workstations and the Samba member server are on the >> same network segment. As the member server only serves files to the >> local
2023 Jan 17
1
Default route mandatory on a Samba member server?
Op 17-01-2023 om 14:02 schreef Rowland Penny via samba: > > > On 17/01/2023 12:49, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> Hi folks, >> >> Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? > > I would have thought they were mandatory on any computer, never mind > Samba. No, they are not required on any computer. It is just to give you access to
2023 Apr 30
3
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >> >> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: > > On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30-04-2023 12:04, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 10:52, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:51, Kees van Vloten via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote:
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30-04-2023 10:46, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>>> Hi Yvan, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the information, really useful.
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30-04-2023 10:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will >>> be the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released,
2023 Apr 30
1
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 30/04/2023 09:37, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > > > On 30.04.2023 10:20, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> >> >> On 30/04/2023 09:06, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: >>> Hi Yvan, >>> >>> Thanks for the information, really useful. Essentially, it means I >>> need to wait for the official release of Debian Bookworm, and then
2023 Apr 30
2
Default Samba version in Debian Bookworm
On 29.04.2023 10:35, Yvan Masson via samba wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Le 28/04/2023 ? 21:17, Peter Milesson via samba a ?crit?: >> Hi folks, >> >> I have tried to get some information about what Samba version will be >> the default one when Debian Bookworm gets released, but without luck. >> Will it be 4.17, or 4.18? Or even 4.19.x? Will there be Samba
2018 Oct 01
4
getent not showing domain users and groups with winbind but works with sssd
On 10/1/18 10:02 AM, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 30 Sep 2018 23:25:48 +0200 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi folks, >> >> AD server CentOS 7-1804, Samba 4.9.1 compiled from source, only used >> as AD server, with netlogon and sysvol, just like any Windows AD >> server >> >> AD member server
2024 Nov 29
1
Linux desktop setup with authentication against Samba AD DC
On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 20:50:21 +0100 Peter Milesson <miles at atmos.eu> wrote: > > On 11/29/24 20:07, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:07:45 +0100 > > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > >>> Hi Peter, that was actually more than what I was expecting, a very > >>> detailed tutorial
2024 Nov 29
1
Linux desktop setup with authentication against Samba AD DC
On 11/29/24 20:07, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 12:07:45 +0100 > Peter Milesson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >>> Hi Peter, that was actually more than what I was expecting, a very >>> detailed tutorial indeed. >>> >>> I wonder if the basic setup could be used with any Linux distro ? >>> Only one
2025 Jan 20
2
Time synchronization problem. Chrony, ntp
On 20 January 2025 15:18 Luis Peromarta wrote: > > I hope to be able to do the same kind of tests, > On 20 Jan 2025 at 15:10 +0000, Peter Milesson <miles at atmos.eu>, wrote: > > > > I have tested with Windows 7 Pro (SP1), Windows 10 Pro (22H2), and > > Windows 11 Pro (24H2). All those clients report CMOS clock as time > > source. I also suspect that
2004 Dec 02
2
mandatory profiles
Hello! I am running samba 3.0 on fc2 in a win2000 network. I want to use only mandatory profiles in the network, but can't get this to work properly. I have set up a "perfect user" on my local machine", and copied this profile to \\server\netlogon\Default User. I have also made this default profile mandatory by renaming ntuser.dat to ntuser.man. In smb.conf I have added:
2024 Nov 29
2
Linux desktop setup with authentication against Samba AD DC
Mandi! Peter Milesson via samba In chel di` si favelave... > This is post no. 2, with technical information of how I set up the Linux > PCs, and additional information about setting up the server shares. It All this can be placed on wiki, sometking like this page: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Joining_a_Windows_Client_or_Server_to_a_Domain but for linux? Seems complete, to me,
2003 Dec 05
1
error:SMB signing is mandatory error.
I have encountered this error: cli_negprot: SMB signing is mandatory and we have disabled it. 26595: protocol negotiation failed SMB connection failed when I am attempting to mount a windows xp machine from a linux machine: mount -t smbfs //machine/share /root/smb_mnt -o username=administrator,password=mypass I have looked through the archives and found the following information concerning this