similar to: [PATCH 5/5] vdpa: mlx5: support per virtqueue dma device

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "[PATCH 5/5] vdpa: mlx5: support per virtqueue dma device"

2023 Sep 09
0
[PATCH RFC v2 2/4] vdpa/mlx5: implement .reset_map driver op
Today, mlx5_vdpa gets started by preallocate 1:1 DMA mapping at device creation time, while this 1:1 mapping will be implicitly destroyed when the first .set_map call is invoked. Everytime when the .reset callback is invoked, any mapping left behind will be dropped then reset back to the initial 1:1 DMA mapping. In order to reduce excessive memory mapping cost during live migration, it is
2023 Feb 15
1
[PATCH v3] vdpa/mlx5: should not activate virtq object when suspended
Otherwise the virtqueue object to instate could point to invalid address that was unmapped from the MTT: mlx5_core 0000:41:04.2: mlx5_cmd_out_err:782:(pid 8321): CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT(0xa00) op_mod(0xd) failed, status bad parameter(0x3), syndrome (0x5fa1c), err(-22) Fixes: cae15c2ed8e6 ("vdpa/mlx5: Implement susupend virtqueue callback") Cc: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com>
2023 Mar 17
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Remove debugfs file after device unregister
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 4:41?PM Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> wrote: > > When deleting the vdpa device, the debugfs files need to be removed so > need to remove debugfs after the device has been unregistered. > > This fixes null pointer dereference when someone deletes the device > after debugfs has been populated. > > Fixes: 294221004322 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add
2023 Feb 16
1
[PATCH v3] vdpa/mlx5: should not activate virtq object when suspended
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:31 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: > > Otherwise the virtqueue object to instate could point to invalid address > that was unmapped from the MTT: > > mlx5_core 0000:41:04.2: mlx5_cmd_out_err:782:(pid 8321): > CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT(0xa00) op_mod(0xd) failed, status > bad parameter(0x3), syndrome (0x5fa1c), err(-22) > >
2023 Feb 16
1
[PATCH v3] vdpa/mlx5: should not activate virtq object when suspended
On 2/15/2023 8:48 PM, Jason Wang wrote: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 9:31 AM Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu at oracle.com> wrote: >> Otherwise the virtqueue object to instate could point to invalid address >> that was unmapped from the MTT: >> >> mlx5_core 0000:41:04.2: mlx5_cmd_out_err:782:(pid 8321): >> CREATE_GENERAL_OBJECT(0xa00) op_mod(0xd) failed, status
2023 Mar 17
0
[PATCH v2 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Extend driver support for new features
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 3:28?PM Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> wrote: > > Extend the possible list for features that can be supported by firmware. > Note that different versions of firmware may or may not support these > features. The driver is made aware of them by querying the firmware. > > While doing this, improve the code so we use enum names instead of hard > coded
2023 Mar 22
1
[PATCH v4 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Make VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF off by default
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 01:28:08PM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > Following patch adds driver support for VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF. > > Current firmware versions show degradation in packet rate when using > MRG_RXBUF. Users who favor memory saving over packet rate could enable > this feature but we want to keep it off by default. > > One can still enable it when creating the vdpa
2023 Apr 03
0
[Patch v3] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid losing link state updates
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 2:47?PM Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> wrote: > > > On 03/04/2023 8:01, Jason Wang wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 10:15?PM Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> wrote: > >> Current code ignores link state updates if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS was not > >> negotiated. However, link state updates could be received before feature > >>
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Setup driver only if VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
----- Original Message ----- > If the memory map changes before the driver status is > VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK, don't attempt to create resources because it > may fail. For example, if the VQ is not ready there is no point in > creating resources. > > Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices") > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen
2020 Sep 07
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Setup driver only if VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:51:36AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > If the memory map changes before the driver status is > VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK, don't attempt to create resources because it > may fail. For example, if the VQ is not ready there is no point in > creating resources. > > Fixes: 1a86b377aa21 ("vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices") >
2020 Sep 08
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Setup driver only if VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 02:43:51PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 07:34:00AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 10:51:36AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > If the memory map changes before the driver status is > > > VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK, don't attempt to create resources because it > > > may fail. For example,
2020 Sep 09
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Setup driver only if VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:53:23AM -0400, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > If the memory map changes before the driver status is > > > VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK, don't attempt to create resources because it > > > may fail. For example, if the VQ is not ready there is no point in
2020 Sep 09
0
[PATCH v2] vdpa/mlx5: Setup driver only if VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK
----- Original Message ----- > set_map() is used by mlx5 vdpa to create a memory region based on the > address map passed by the iotlb argument. If we get successive calls, we > will destroy the current memory region and build another one based on > the new address mapping. We also need to setup the hardware resources > since they depend on the memory region. > > If these
2023 Mar 12
0
[PATCH 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Make VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF off by default
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > One can still enable it when creating the vdpa device using vdpa tool by > providing features that include it. > > For example: > $ vdpa dev add name vdpa0 mgmtdev pci/0000:86:00.2 device_features 0x300cb982b > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> What's the reason to turn it off by default?
2023 Mar 12
0
[PATCH 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Make VIRTIO_NET_F_MRG_RXBUF off by default
On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 11:10:25AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > On 12/03/2023 10:58, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 12, 2023 at 10:39:19AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > One can still enable it when creating the vdpa device using vdpa tool by > > > providing features that include it. > > > > > > For example: > > > $ vdpa dev add
2023 Mar 27
0
[PATCH] vdpa/mlx5: Avoid losing link state updates
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 10:01:05AM +0200, Eli Cohen wrote: > Current code ignores link state updates if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS was not > negotiated. However, link state updates could be received before feature > negotiation was completed , therefore causing link state events to be > lost, possibly leaving the link state down. > > Add code to detect if VIRTIO_NET_F_STATUS was set
2023 Mar 21
0
[PATCH v3 1/2] vdpa/mlx5: Extend driver support for new features
On 3/20/2023 4:49 AM, Eli Cohen wrote: > Extend the possible list for features that can be supported by firmware. > Note that different versions of firmware may or may not support these > features. The driver is made aware of them by querying the firmware. > > While doing this, improve the code so we use enum names instead of hard > coded numerical values. > > The new
2020 Jul 16
0
[PATCH vhost next 10/10] vdpa/mlx5: Add VDPA driver for supported mlx5 devices
On 2020/7/16 ??3:23, Eli Cohen wrote: > Add a front end VDPA driver that registers in the VDPA bus and provides > networking to a guest. The VDPA driver creates the necessary resources > on the VF it is driving such that data path will be offloaded. > > Notifications are being communicated through the driver. > > Currently, only VFs are supported. In subsequent patches we will
2020 Sep 28
0
[PATCH V1 vhost-next] vdpa/mlx5: Make vdpa core driver a distinct module
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > block implementation will be able to use it. > > Signed-off-by: Eli Cohen <elic at nvidia.com> Why don't we merge this patch together with the block module? > --- > V0 --> V1: > Removed "default n" for configu options
2020 Sep 29
0
[PATCH V1 vhost-next] vdpa/mlx5: Make vdpa core driver a distinct module
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:20:26AM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 03:55:09PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:32:31PM +0300, Eli Cohen wrote: > > > Change core vdpa functionality into a loadbale module such that upcoming > > > block implementation will be able to use it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Eli