similar to: PXELinux / gPXE no IP by DHCP

Hey *, When using gPXE as a second stage loader, the computer will complete this procedure: POST/BIOS, PXE (DHCP+TFTP) -> Download gPXE ROM, Execute ROM, Do a second DHCP request, Download images with HTTP, I was wondering if PXELinux/gPXE can give the gPXE-ROM some parameters like a static IP based on the IP they got the first time, so it does not have to do the second DHCP request. I am

I am pushing the undionly.kpxe to clients, and serving pxelinux.0 from SYSLinux3.70-pre19. The hardware is not very relevant, I am using VMWare Workstation 6 (e1000 adapter). I've tested it on real network cards like Intel, Broadcom and NVidia 1000 mbit , and they all boot successfully. This problem seems like a VMWare - gPXE incompatibility issue. -- Matthew Steggink

Op 2014-08-01 om 20:35 schreef Ady: > Goal: To have one USB drive capable of booting UEFI IA32 and UEFI X64 > (with an optional Syslinux menu containing multiple entries). What I would like to have is the same thing for network boot. So having one topdirectory on the TFTP server that can serve several "architectures". > Problem (solved) #1: The default directory location for

I am testing several Operating System Streaming products to streams virtual desktops. They always requires pxe boot but xen seems to have a pxe which is not suitable. I got the same problem with kqemu and kvm and I solved it using gpxe. With xen I tried to chainloading gpxe (following gpxe wiki) but hvmloader fails to load it (memory problem?). Any workaround

Hi, I have a working PXE environment that chainloads gPXE and loads pxelinux.0 afterwards. As I'm also interested in doing san boot (in my case aoe) I tried loading the new gpxelinux.0 file instead of my gPXE --> pxelinux.0 setup (works) and booting from my aoe target by adding this to the default config file: LABEL doaoe MENU LABEL Continue AoE kernel sanboot.c32 append

I installed CentOS6 with the xen4centos set of packages; then I tried to install KVM (for performance comparison), I got the following error in YUM: --> Processing Dependency: /usr/share/gpxe/e1000-0x100e.rom for package: 2:qemu-kvm-0.12.1.2-2.415.el6_5.4.x86_64 Package gpxe-roms-qemu is obsoleted by ipxe-roms-qemu, but obsoleting package does not provide for requirements I manually

Hello, This is my first post. Please forgive me if I am not posting this in the right location. I work at a college where we clone staff computer every now and then. We have an internal network in our office. There is a Linux NAT, DHCP, PXE server in our office separating the two networks. Internally, we PXE with images that boot into Ghost to clone computers. We do not have access to the

Possibly authority variable (initialized with NULL) might be dereferenced when an arbitrary path (without "//" on it) is supplied to parse_uri() function Signed-off-by: Felipe Pena <felipensp at gmail.com> --- gpxe/src/core/uri.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gpxe/src/core/uri.c b/gpxe/src/core/uri.c index 6a1f2e5..4987821 100644 ---

Hi All, Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I've managed to get pxelinux to load gpxe and then manually load linux by using the gpxe command line and HTTP for the kernel and initial ram disk. My question is whether it is possible to somehow pass gpxe commands through some mechanism other than the DHCP filename response. Since I don't have control over our DHCP infrastructure, but do

syslinux 3.86 and 4.00-pre55 make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gzp/src/syslinux-4.00-pre55/gpxe/src' [AR] bin/blib.a ar: creating bin/blib.a [HOSTCC] util/zbin [LD] bin/undionly.kkpxe.tmp arch/i386/scripts/i386.lds:1: undefined symbol `_max_align' referenced in expression make[2]: *** [bin/undionly.kkpxe.tmp] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory

Randy McAnally wrote: > > Thank you so much, this is the kind of news I needed! > > ---------- Original Message ----------- > From: "Arends, R.R." <r.r.arends at hro.nl> > To: "Randy McAnally" <rsm at fast-serv.com> > Cc: <gpxe at etherboot.org> > Sent: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:10:56 +0100 > Subject: Re: [gPXE] localboot 0 hang on some

Unable to boot using qemu-kvm and gPXE from virt-preview repository https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512358 Signed-off-by: Alan Pevec <apevec at redhat.com> --- common-blacklist.ks | 9 +++++++++ common-pkgs.ks | 3 +++ 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/common-blacklist.ks b/common-blacklist.ks index 7c19aa4..2f8842f 100644 ---

You're all back! (yippie!). Now I can ask the question that's been nagging at me over the past month... Is booting gpxelinux.0, under QEMU, which provides it's own GPXE capable boot rom supposed to work? Or, is it a redundant (the GPXE boot room already provides the functionality of gpxelinux.0) and suicidally dumb thing to do? I've found some references to other people

Hi, I'm investigating using LTSP for thin clients at my place of work, and I've encountered a problem that I don't know how to approach. I don't know if the problem is with gPXE, PXELinux, or the LTSP kernel, but I think PXELinux is probably the right level to investigate it. My situation is as follows: I've installed the LTSP system from Ubuntu Gutsy. I've tested it

I am attempting to setup a test gpxe(linux.0) http site, to test among other things the recent dynamic option 252 solution. In the process of investigation I stumbled across http://www.etherboot.org/wiki/appnotes/authmenus which indicates the gpxe can launch vesamenu.c32 directly. Various other pages on etherboot's site indicate menu.c32/vesamenu.c32 can be used independently as well.

Hello everyone, I have just released SYSLINUX 3.70, which is the first version which includes gPXE for support of non-TFTP network scripts, as well as a large number of other enhancments. gPXE support is still somewhat experimental - in particular it still doesn't support chaining other NBPs. Very special thanks to: - rPath, Inc, my employer, for the uncountable hours I've spent

Hi All, I've been trying to understand how to use pxechn.c32 to chain a local pxelinux menu item to a remote server which has it's own pxelinux hierarchy served via TFTP and HTTP. We have no control over DHCP next-server and filename fields so I wanted to exploit the "prefix" -p option that pxechn.c32 accepts. I spent a long time hitting my head against a brick wall until I

On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Michael Brown via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > Also, not a fork: http://git.ipxe.org/ipxe.git/commitdiff/8406115 A fork is a fork, regardless the reasons behind it (yes, I have some understanding in this case). iPXE is based off of forking further development as of a certain gPXE commit with some backporting of gPXE development to iPXE. --

Signed-off-by: Gilles Espinasse <g.esp at free.fr> --- gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping | 10 ++++++++++ 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping b/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping index 1f5e115..d49416e 100644 --- a/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping +++ b/gpxe/src/Makefile.housekeeping @@ -134,6 +134,16 @@ SP_FLAGS := $(shell $(SP_TEST)

The following changes since commit a2f057c289cbf142cdd6de7d89123df2f21e475a: Matt Fleming (1): bios, font: zero input registers to get font are available in the git repository at: git://github.com/geneC/syslinux.git makefile-gpxe-fix-for-mfleming Gene Cumm (1): Makefile: make gpxe/ depend on core/ Makefile | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)