similar to: bind9 lockup problem

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "bind9 lockup problem"

2023 Jan 09
1
bind9 lockup problem
On 09/01/2023 14:35, Arnaud FLORENT via samba wrote: > Hi everyone and best wishes for 2023 > > > I think i'm facing the bind 9 DLZ lockup problem described here: > > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#The_Lockup_Problem > > > running samba 4.16 AD on ubuntu 20.04 with bind 9.16.15 > > there are about 500 computers on the network.
2020 Sep 30
3
Bind9 issue
Yesterday I had an issue with Samba v 4.13.0. Went to backup and discovered backup computer has a drive failure and backup is gone. Only resort is to rebuild the DC. I cannot figure out why bind9 will not "host -t SRV _ldap._ tcp.ad.dtntwk.work." or "host -t SRV _kerberos._udp.ad.dtntwk.work." root at dc1:~# host -t SRV _ldap._tcp.subdom.example.com. >
2016 Oct 16
2
bind9 won't run
I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with Bind9_DLZ. I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software setup. First machine is working fine. At the moment this (second) machine is not joined to the other (until I get Bind running.) I have searched log complaints. Compared settings between the two machines and despite bind running on the first one,
2016 Oct 16
1
bind9 won't run
On 2016-10-16 12:55, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 12:38:00 -0500 > Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I am working on my second Ubuntu 16.04.1LTS running Samba 4.5.0 with >> Bind9_DLZ. >> >> I have one machine just like this one. Same hardware, same software >> setup. First machine is
2019 May 05
1
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi Rowland, The samba-tool dns zonelist 127.0.0.1 -U Administrator%xxxxxxxxxx | grep 'pszZoneName', gives Using binding ncacn_ip_tcp:127.0.0.1[,sign] Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 135 added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.14.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 added interface eth0 ip=192.168.117.10 bcast=192.168.14.255 netmask=255.255.255.0 Mapped to DCERPC endpoint 1024 added interface
2019 Sep 05
4
DNS question
Dear list, we use debian stretch with Louis's 4.10.5 packages and bind9_dlz backend. There are two AD DCs with redundant ISC DHCP servers on them. The DHCP servers are updating the DNS along the lines of https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_DHCP_to_update_DNS_records_with_BIND9 but with nsupdate commands replaced by suitable calls to "samba-tool" (I had problems getting the
2018 Mar 12
9
Workaround for bind9 reload bug : samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone
Hi samba team ! I'm face with a new problem on a new Samba PDC install (Debian 9). I don't know why, but systemd run multiples "rndc reconfig" commands during the init script. So the bind9 log file show : -> A successful start -> A failed reconfig (samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone) at each boot/reboot. So I need to restart bind9 each time manually. I created a wrapper
2019 May 04
2
Issues with bind9 dlz
Hi Rowland, Thank you. I think the 5 zones maybe a parsing issues somewhere. Also, the realms are in capital, must have been a typo. The UFW has been disabled and selinux is in a disbaled state /etc/bind/named.conf.options has options { directory "/var/cache/bind"; // If there is a firewall between you and nameservers you want // to talk to, you may need to
2018 Mar 13
1
Workaround for bind9 reload bug : samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone
Sorry, Louis, not all of us use systemd. > Almost Harry... > > For debian Stretch. # cat /etc/debian_version buster/sid # cat /proc/1/cmdline /sbin/init You see: good old init. Just a test machine for a scheduled upgrade. > systemctl cat bind9 > # /lib/systemd/system/bind9.service > [Unit] > Description=BIND Domain Name Server > Documentation=man:named(8) >
2018 Jul 02
2
client @0x7f6ed800bc20 172.16.5.86#62582: update 'campus.company.intra/IN' denied
> > Hmm, bind 9.12.x isn't supported yet. He works with "dlopen /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/bind9/dlz_bind9_11.so" without problems, at first. include "/etc/bind/rndc.key"; > controls { > inet 127.0.0.1 allow { localhost; } keys { rndc-key;}; > }; > You do not need the four lines above Ok, but if I leave it, does not have problems
2016 May 27
1
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/05/16 17:11, Jeff Sadowski wrote: > >> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD >> helped me find that I needed to add >> >> options { >> [...] >> tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; >>
2018 Mar 13
1
Workaround for bind9 reload bug : samba_dlz Ignoring duplicate zone
Hai Baptiste, You missed my first message but here it is again. . systemctl cat bind9 # /lib/systemd/system/bind9.service [Unit] Description=BIND Domain Name Server Documentation=man:named(8) After=network.target Wants=nss-lookup.target Before=nss-lookup.target [Service] EnvironmentFile=/etc/default/bind9 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/named -f $OPTIONS ExecReload=/usr/sbin/rndc reload
2016 May 27
2
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
I had left my config alone for now and dhcp still writes to DOMAIN1.SUBDOMAIN.TLD. But samba has been complaining about not being able to write to bind in its zone. [2016/05/27 07:30:06.738434, 0] ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295(dnsupdate_nameupdate_done) ../source4/dsdb/dns/dns_update.c:295: Failed DNS update - NT_STATUS_UNSUCCESSFUL If you are right about it using kerberos I think I am
2019 Jan 22
4
Samba BIND9_DLZ autoupdate PTR
Set auth-nxdomain yes; And stop/start bind9 Other source : https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/teamdhcp/2015/09/10/a-description-of-the-dns-dynamic-update-message-format/ /snap The DNS Client and Server services support the use of dynamic updates, as described in Request for Comments (RFC) 2136, "Dynamic Updates in the Domain Name System." The DNS Server service allows dynamic
2016 May 27
2
ISC's dhcp server, radvd and bind9 now adding samba as an AD DC
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Configure_BIND_as_backend_for_Samba_AD helped me find that I needed to add options { [...] tkey-gssapi-keytab "/usr/local/samba/private/dns.keytab"; [...] }; That seems to have fixed my errors with DNS On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 27/05/16 14:37, Jeff Sadowski wrote: >
2020 Sep 30
6
Bind9 issue
Rowland, To answer you first, my "example.com" registered host is a wildcat " *. example.com". Everything example.com returns my external ip address. Both bind9 and samba are running. Might add your "options" but for now, solving my problem, first. Louis, your answer in a few minutes. On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 8:09 AM Rowland penny via samba < samba at
2019 Apr 17
2
Is possible use BIND9 as DNS Back End on a new Samba DC?
Hi everyone, I have a question: is possible use BIND9 as DNS backend on a new Samba DC that will join into a domain where there are Samba DCs are using Samba Internal DNS server? I know that is a trivial question for someone, but I've followed steps described on wiki's topic "Joining a Samba DC to an Existing Active Directory" and in "Preparing the Host for Joining the
2017 Jan 13
2
Why is S4 attempting to execute rndc when using *INTERNAL* DNS?
My AD domain (SerNET S4 4.5.3) using S4's internal DNS, and always has. So why is it now constantly logging an error of - [2017/01/13 12:53:00.152754, 0] ../lib/util/util_runcmd.c:316(samba_runcmd_io_handler) /usr/sbin/rndc: Failed to exec child - No such file or directory - after attempting to add a 2008R2 DC. I do not recall seeing this error previously [not prior to
2020 Oct 01
1
Bind9 issue
Hi Bob, ? Ok, things are looking ok again? dpkg-reconfiure krb5.conf , doesnt do much expect installing and configuringing krb5.conf which basicly only sets the REALM.? "init administrator" will not connect to kerberos? If the DNS isnt running, its unable to resolv the servernames for the REALM. Resulting in, you not able to kinit. ? Greetz, ? Louis ? ? Van: Robert Wooden
2019 Aug 05
6
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
... From your output below.. >> Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version << Then tell uss, why are 3 lines uncommented? I suggest, run : https://raw.githubusercontent.com/thctlo/samba4/master/samba-collect-debug-info.sh Anonimize it where needed, and show me your server setup. Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: