Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "msdfs proxy and subfolders"
2023 Jan 05
1
msdfs proxy and subfolders
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 01:28:55PM -0500, Nick Couchman via samba wrote:
>Hello, everyone,
>I'm seeing some inconsistent behavior across SMB clients when
>configuring shares using the "msdfs proxy" parameter, and was hoping
>to get some advice from the community on this. My issue is that
>various SMB clients seem to behave differently when this parameter is
>pointed
2005 May 06
1
msdfs not working on netbios aliases?
I encountered strange behaviour of "msdfs" when using together
with "netbios aliases".
E.g I have in smb.conf:
[global]
netbios name = server
netbios aliases = server-oldname
....
host msdfs = Yes
[share1]
path = /var/samba/share1
[share2]
msdfs root = Yes
msdfs proxy = \penguin\share2
....
From a windows (XP) machine I can now see:
\\server\share1
and
2023 Jan 05
1
msdfs proxy and subfolders
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 1:58 PM Jeremy Allison <jra at samba.org> wrote:
>
> >* Would the behavior of smbclient and smbj be considered a bug, or the
> >intended/correct behavior?
>
> Looks like a bug in smbclient to me. Can you log a bug
> and I'll follow up. Thanks !
Thanks for the response, Jeremy - I have put in my Bugzilla account
request and will fill in the
2007 Jun 11
1
dfs problems in 3.0.25a after client reboot and remapping
We restored to 3.0.23d after update to 3.0.25a because of strange dfs behavior.
the detailed situation:
on msdfs root server 'samba' ls -lR
dfsroot/:
drwxr-xr-x appl1
dfsroot/appl1
lrwxrwxrwx share1 -> msdfs:server1\share1
[dfs]
comment = "SaMBa DFS root"
path = /path.../dfsroot
# next line does not work prior 3.0.25 !!!
# hide unreadable = Yes
2011 Apr 05
3
MSDFS - Can you hide folders with no access
Hello,
i got a msdfs share running and now i want to hide folders from users who
got no access to them anyway.
For example:
List of shares:
test1
test2
User sees only:
test1
Is something like that possible mit samba itself or does someone know a
workaround to get it running like that ?
Thanks for any ideas.
A.Dura
2001 Mar 28
1
MSDFS extensions
Hello,
I'm setting up MSDFS feature in samba-2.2.0-alpha3. It works very great!
But I'm would wish an extension to the MSDFS functionality:
Is it possible to implement a feature, so I could group junction points
within directories?
E.g.:
[pub]
path = /export/publicsmb
msdfs root = yes
PUB
|
+- dir1 <- directory manually created in /export/publicsmb
| |
|
2009 Mar 12
0
Implimenting MSDFS Issue
Hello,
I am running the following
OS
CentOS 5.2
Samba Release
samba-3.0.28
Kernel
2.6.18-92.1.22 (latest from CentOS)
I also tried compiling a custom kernel with the experimental MSDFS option in kernel version 2.6.28.7 to no avail.
Microsoft Server OS
Windows Server 2003 R2
My Samba server has winbind enabled and the following smb.conf configuration.
[global]
socket options =
2016 Apr 03
2
some questions to samba and W7 and W10
Hello,
i got some clients (WINDOWS7 and WINDOWS10) to connect to samba shares.
OS is openSUSE 12.2; 13.1; 42.1
Samba-Version: 3.6.7; 4.1.22; 4.2.4
smb.conf is shown below.
The samba setup is a workgroup setup, the W7-clients
are set up to the workgroup 'workgroup'.
No further changes are made to the W7-clients.
samba setup:
groupadd workgroup
chgrp -R workgroup /srv/samba
chmod -R 770
2011 Jun 09
3
DFS root only works for more recent Windows clients
I've been testing DFS roots and I'm finding that while Vista and 2008
Server clients can connect with no problems, Windows XP Pro and 2003
Server clients fail. This seems like it's the wrong way round - Samba
usually has more difficulties with recent Windows versions than older
ones - but I can only assume that there's some registry/policy change
between the versions. If anybody
2007 Feb 16
0
msdfs for local redirects?
Hi,
until now the users here did access the samba shares directly via
\\server\share. The number of shares is rising and it should now be
possible to access shares by the department they belong to. Thus the
users need only one drive letter and not many in their windows
explorer.
To accomplish this I tried the msdfs approach and it's working very
nicely.
on serverA:
share1 ->
2011 Jan 12
1
Automounting DFS path published shares under RHEL 5 with Samba?
I'm dealing with a Linux environment with extensive automounting, that
also has DFS configurations for the Windows clients of various CIFS
systems. I've got CIFS automounting working for various CIFS servers,
which definitely has its uses, but I'd *love* to be able to mount the
DIFS published paths for the CIFS shares?
Basically, if I have shares called \\example1\share1 and
2013 Oct 21
1
DFS share: free space?
Hi,
is it possible, to use DFS and show the correct values of free space?
I set up a DFS-share located on filesystem1 (size 50GB) and linked shares of another server to this share
(msdfs:<fs>\share):
share1: size 110TB
share2: size 50TB
share3: size 20TB
But connecting to the DFS-share, the disk size of this network drive ist 50GB. Unfortunately files larger than
50GB can not be copied
2008 Jul 29
2
msdfs root = yes is the default???
Why is that when you create a share, the default is 'msdfs root = yes'?
Also, why is that a share that is set 'msdfs root = yes' -- or, rather,
a share that does /not/ set 'msdfs root = no' -- advertises that it is a
DFS root to the Linux CIFS client, /even /when 'host msdfs = no'? This
sounds like A) a bug (ignoring 'host msdfs', and B) a misfeature (msdfs
2024 Jun 07
2
missing msdfs referrals from samba directory listing: wrong order in smbd_dirptr_get_entry()?
07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18.
This is not entirely true.
>> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this?
>
> There must not be a test for your specific use-case.
>
> MSDFS is tested in the autobuild test suite. Can
> you articulate the problem well enough we can
> build a
2011 Mar 16
1
Authoritative DNS Server
When I setup Samba4 I already had a master and slave bind9 server so I
copied the relevant dns information to my master server however I don't know
how to make my existing server authoritative for the zone. It will send
notifies to the slave and allow ddns updates but the slave shows this error:
"slave-server named[1187]: client 1.1.1.1#22792: received notify for zone
2013 Feb 04
1
msdfs proxy question
Hi List,
I am struggling a little bit with the msdfs proxy parameter.
I want the samba server as a kind of a bridge between two networks, that
the samba server only shares some of the shares provided by our file
server to a second network.
I don't want the samba srv to be a gw or give the clients a route to the
internal network, because it is a total different user group.
I first tried to
2024 Jun 07
1
missing msdfs referrals from samba directory listing: wrong order in smbd_dirptr_get_entry()?
On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 07:16:06AM +0300, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
>06.06.2024 19:33, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
>
>>For quite some time I'm trying to find what's going on with MSDFS referrals.
>>Samba version is 4.19.6.
>..
>>However, when opening the directory in question from client, this name is not
>>shown in the listing.? Samba skips
2002 Nov 11
1
MSDFS...
Hi, After some experiment with MSDFS on Samba I have seen this problems
and I don't know if this are caused by my possible wrong configuration or
if are "feature" of MSDFS:
-as described into the documentation I compiled a Samba version with
--with-msdfs and this smb.conf (server 172.26.11.236). The configuration
file is:
[Global]
host msdfs = yes
[dfs]
path = /mnt/disk
2011 Aug 02
1
msdfs and %u
I tryed to use msdfs, but it doesn't work.
Is it my fault, or is it a bug?
log.snmd:
smbd/msdfs.c:295(create_conn_struct)
create_conn_struct: Can't ChDir to new conn path /mypath/host/%u. Error was No such file or directory
Part of smb.conf:
[global]
...
host msdfs = yes
...
[eb]
path = /mypath/data/eb
force group =smb
valid users = @gruppeeb
write list = @gruppeeb
browseable = no
2024 Jun 07
1
missing msdfs referrals from samba directory listing: wrong order in smbd_dirptr_get_entry()?
On 07-06-2024 06:59, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote:
> 07.06.2024 07:54, Jeremy Allison wrote:
>>> msdfs is broken in 4.19.? It worked fine in 4.18.
>
> This is not entirely true.
>
>>> Is no one using msdfs?? I wonder why I was the first to discover this?
>>
>> There must not be a test for your specific use-case.
>>
>> MSDFS is tested in the