Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "On retiring some terminology"
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is familiar. Not invented by Cisco. As in, producer-consumer, from the same time. Those were all different paradigms for client-server relationships. There must be Wikipedia citations that can be consulted. As I recall, there were distinctions, such as, producer-consumer were tightly bound, where the producer had no purpose
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is familiar. Not invented by Cisco. As in, producer-consumer, from the same time. Those were all different paradigms for client-server relationships. There must be Wikipedia citations that can be consulted. As I recall, there were distinctions, such as, producer-consumer were tightly bound, where the producer had no purpose
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
There is,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish%E2%80%93subscribe_pattern
I said I stayed away from it because of the Cisco link. Others as well as
you are free to persue it. I was just making suggestions.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:43 PM Baker, Lawrence M <baker at usgs.gov> wrote:
> That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is
> familiar. Not invented by
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
There is,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publish%E2%80%93subscribe_pattern
I said I stayed away from it because of the Cisco link. Others as well as
you are free to persue it. I was just making suggestions.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:43 PM Baker, Lawrence M <baker at usgs.gov> wrote:
> That is terminology from Computer Science. (Decades ago?) It is
> familiar. Not invented by
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
Thank you for the suggestions, keep them coming :)
To me, I think I considered pub-sub but it did not quite fit - gotta
refresh my memory by code re-reading (or expert comments) - I found I'm
vague now on who hits the big red button to shout that a particular power
source device got critical - the upsmon in "master" role, or "upsd" that
talks to all subscribed (indeed!)
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
Thank you for the suggestions, keep them coming :)
To me, I think I considered pub-sub but it did not quite fit - gotta
refresh my memory by code re-reading (or expert comments) - I found I'm
vague now on who hits the big red button to shout that a particular power
source device got critical - the upsmon in "master" role, or "upsd" that
talks to all subscribed (indeed!)
2021 Mar 18
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
So, for the past couple of days the SurveyMonkey results are not changing,
with 13 replies overall. Should we wait for more or everyone passionate
enough has already spoken? In practice I'd likely follow up on a weekend
anyway, but... the weekend is coming! :)
Currently we have a clear leader pair that collected almost half the votes
(6), two votes were to keep old words in place - alas,
2021 Mar 18
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
So, for the past couple of days the SurveyMonkey results are not changing,
with 13 replies overall. Should we wait for more or everyone passionate
enough has already spoken? In practice I'd likely follow up on a weekend
anyway, but... the weekend is coming! :)
Currently we have a clear leader pair that collected almost half the votes
(6), two votes were to keep old words in place - alas,
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
Jim,
The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is publisher-subscriber.
Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
baker at usgs.gov<mailto:baker at usgs.gov>
On Mar 12 2021, at 6:24:38 PM, Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net<mailto:nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net>> wrote:
This email has been received from
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
Jim,
The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is publisher-subscriber.
Larry Baker
US Geological Survey
650-329-5608
baker at usgs.gov<mailto:baker at usgs.gov>
On Mar 12 2021, at 6:24:38 PM, Phil Stracchino via Nut-upsuser <nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net<mailto:nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net>> wrote:
This email has been received from
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser <
nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is
> publisher-subscriber.
>
> Larry Baker
> US Geological Survey
> 650-329-5608
> baker at usgs.gov
>
>
>
> On Mar 12
2021 Mar 13
1
[EXTERNAL] Re: On retiring some terminology
I didn't go there due to its use by Cisco.
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021, 10:03 PM Baker, Lawrence M via Nut-upsuser <
nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
> Jim,
>
> The terminology I recall for that one-to-many relationship is
> publisher-subscriber.
>
> Larry Baker
> US Geological Survey
> 650-329-5608
> baker at usgs.gov
>
>
>
> On Mar 12
2021 Mar 13
1
On retiring some terminology
On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote:
> Manager/subscriber seems most accurate
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons <doug at parsonsemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>> In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to
>> the role.
I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.
2021 Mar 13
1
On retiring some terminology
On 3/12/21 9:14 PM, Rusty Bower wrote:
> Manager/subscriber seems most accurate
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 12, 2021, at 20:13, Douglas Parsons <doug at parsonsemail.com> wrote:
>>
>> ?
>> In place of secondary how about subscriber? It would be accurate to
>> the role.
I'd been going to suggest controller and ... something.
2021 Mar 12
2
On retiring some terminology
Hello fellow NUTs :)
Some time ago an issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/840
was raised, and with current work underway to publish a standard on NUT
protocol it became more urgent - to retire the master/slave terminology
from NUT configuration and documentation.
I looked around for suitable synonyms, and for our primary use-case with
upsmon roles - where it either manages an
2021 Mar 12
2
On retiring some terminology
Hello fellow NUTs :)
Some time ago an issue https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/840
was raised, and with current work underway to publish a standard on NUT
protocol it became more urgent - to retire the master/slave terminology
from NUT configuration and documentation.
I looked around for suitable synonyms, and for our primary use-case with
upsmon roles - where it either manages an
2021 Mar 13
1
On retiring some terminology
Thanks again for all the suggestions.
For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are
needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology.
Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to
replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to
type :)
To make the election of team choice more simple, I
2021 Mar 13
1
On retiring some terminology
Thanks again for all the suggestions.
For now I've prepared draft PRs, mostly to map out where the changes are
needed - based on my earlier work with the originally proposed terminology.
Now that we know where to change it, should not be too great a hassle to
replace again by some other choice... subordinate was a bit too long to
type :)
To make the election of team choice more simple, I
2022 Mar 23
1
On retiring some terminology
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/nut-upsuser/attachments/20220323/c7ad42ec/attachment.htm>
2022 Mar 23
3
On retiring some terminology
That's odd, seems a spam or phish sneaked through to the list.
NOT from me :)
Jim
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022, 21:38 Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser via Nut-upsuser <
nut-upsuser at alioth-lists.debian.net> wrote:
> Hello again,
> Please find lower the overall documentation:
>
>
>
>