similar to: Port 32230 anyone?

I''m wondering if is is posable to do something like . /etc/shorewall/somefile from inside the blacklist file is a future release. is is this sort of thing already available and I''m just doing it wrong? -- Brad Wyman |\ _,,,---,,_ bradw@sta-care.com /,`.-''`'' -. ;-;;,_ Network Admin |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `''-'' Sta-Care,

Hi All, Issue: My Syslog logging doesn''t seem to work for REJECT / DROP policies Context: Shorewall version 1.4.4b on a single IP address setup Diagnosis: Default /etc/shorewall/common.def triggers a DROP prior to policy based -j LOG actions For example selected lines (from the generated iptables) ... The net2all policy: a) -A net2all -m state --state RELATED,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT

Dear List! I use a shorewall 2.0.8 on a Debian sarge system. I use a DSL connection to the Internet (ppp0 - eth1 to the modem) and a bridge to the local lan. The bridged config i''ve made with bridge.html from the shorewall site. The Bridge is between local net and a openvpn tap device. This works. I ccan make tunnels, and a can make a lot of things through the firewall. I can get a list

Hi My situation: I have two pc''s with public ip''s (192.159.56.206(webserver) and 84.196.123.65(mail-gateway)) in the dmz. The firewall (84.196.123.66) is configures with proxyarp, so nothing is changed on the pc''s from when they were not behind the firewall (i.e. they don''t have the firewall as gateway (and they each have different gateways, only 84.196.123.65

Hello, I am using Shorewall version 2.0.1 with kernel 2.4.20. Nightly, LogWatch emails a portion of the logs for my review. I notice that there are tons of dropped packets from port 445, somedays as many as 7,000. See sample below: >From 24.226.192.22 - 2 packets To 24.227.147.124 - 2 packets Service: microsoft-ds (tcp/445) (Shorewall:net2all:DROP:,eth0,none) - 2 packets My question is,

(I''m not a member of the list at the moment so please answer this e-mail CC to my personal address. Thank you all) I am part of a community network in Buenos Aires and I''m now trying to set up a bridge between my local net and the community net. The problem is that appart from the bridge between these I need to share an internet connection and the cable modem assigns me a

Hola and thanks for any help in advance I installed mandrake 9 a few days ago and wanted to set up some additional rules to shorewall, bu i failed :) What i want to do is basicly route any incomming udp and tcp packets on port 4665 to a workstation behind the router. router with mandrake 9, eth0 (192.168.0.1) internal net, eth1(10.0.0.0) connected to dsl modem and gets a dynamic ip

Hello! I am using shorewall shorewall-2.0.11-1 on fedora core2 (iptables-1.2.9-95.7). My box has 2 physical nic´s plus one virt. ipsec interface for a freeswan-vpn connection. A few days ago, portsentry spit out a lot of connections from windows clients (port 135, 445). Ooops. I review my shorewall settings but could not find a mistake. So I took a win-client and established a second

The BBC are currently trialling multicasting the Olympics. This requires multicast and IGMP to be available. As far as I can make out, in 2.0.8 at least, all multicast addresses are filtered out and, to my naive eyes, can''t be re-enabled. Please prove me wrong :-) Dirk -- Please Note: Some Quantum Physics Theories Suggest That When the Consumer Is Not Directly Observing This Message,

I''m having a problem with the Shorewall firewall and CUPS printing interfering with each other. My Linux firewall machine is acting as both a CUPS server and client for all of my tests. Shorewall 2.0.13 CUPS 1.1.22-2 Linux kernel 2.6.9 CUPS was working fine to print to my Epson C84 (network connected via a Netgear PS101 print server using lpd://PS101.IP.address/raw ) until I

I have searched your FAQ''s and read the documentation on your site as well as googling. I am not able to figure this out. If you have any ideas can you please help. I am using the linux-ha failover with redundant firewalls. As part of the function of the linux-ha software consists a service called heartbeat which is a connection from each failover node through a serial cable or ethernet.

I have a shorewall 2.0.14 running on a single interface machine (nwww in the log below) that is attempting to be well screwed down. The policy file reads:- #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST fw net DROP info net all DROP info # The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST all all

Hello everybody, I have a two interface setup (with ipsec VPN) on my firewall which is working perfectly. I have upgraded every release of shorewall since 2.0.9 with no problems at all. Now I''m trying to upgrade from 2.0.13 to 2.0.14, when I perform a service shorewall restart I get this error: --------------------------------------- .... Processing

Hi, I have a install of shorewall I have 2 interfaces(I think) ppp0[connection device] and eth0 [LAN device], I want to allow all traffic from the the internet in or aleast port 80 and CVS and webmin and mail and everything normal to the main machine with shorewall on it. I changed to policy file but it just gave me errors as to double interfaces. I also what still to alow connection sharing

Hi, I have some problems with shorewall, I got disconnected every 10 minutes.. All the connections stops I am using Shorewall version 2.4.0-RC2 and it is running on debian 3.1r0 I can''t seem to find the problem. I hope you can help me with this. i post my log so that you can maby see where the problem is.(i have filtert some ip addresses) /sbin/shorewall show log Shorewall-2.4.0-RC2

Hello List, This is my first post to the list, and as such I apologize for the length of it. I tried to put as much detail into this as possible. I recently installed Shorewall on a computer running Gentoo Linux. The computer has 3 network cards in it, but I''ve only configured 2. Going the cheap route, I''m connecting my client directly to my firewall using a crossover cable.

Believe me: Read the FAQ Checked over and over This might be toooooo stupid to be documented. Please bear with me. Any help ? Situation: single card standalone "firewall" (used like a "personal firewall"). Have sshd running on the FW. Want the sshd daemon to be accessible only from 2 LANs: 1) My other home LAN machine 2) IBM intranet machines (9.0.0.0) Whatever I have

I had to restart one of my routers tonight and since then shorewall on it has been dropping SIP packets coming in from one machine instead of forwarding them to the freebpx server. Shorewall:net2all:DROP:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=<removed> SRC=<my home network external ip> DST=<server network external ip> LEN=575 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x20 TTL=78 ID=230 PROTO=UDP SPT=5061 DPT=5060

I have been using shorewall and freeswan successfully for 3 or more years now. But they have all been using the Linux 2.4 kernel. My current configuration is (as the title suggests) using SuSE 9.1 which has a 2.6.5 kernel and freeswan 2.0.4 built-in. After much reading and a lot of trial and error, I did get this combination to work with Shorewall 2.0.9. It is happily talking to an older Mandrake

Using Mandrake 9.2, shorewall 1.4.6c. Everything was working fine until one of the web servers I manage content for (my astronomy club, http://www.starastronomy.org) was "upgraded" to the newset win2K. All of a sudden I can FTP into the machine, but I can''t "ls" or "put" files. I *can* do these things if I turn off my policy of "DROP" for net to fw