similar to: Fwd: Fwd: HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES(SLOVED)

Neil, Doesn't look like my original message made it to the mailing list so here you are. ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Fwd: [CentOS] HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES Date: Sat February 17 2007 10:07 From: Robert Spangler <lazydog at zoominternet.net> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> On Sat February 17 2007 03:11, Indunil Jayasooriya

Hi, I am setting up a firewall on CENTOS 4.4. I have done default block iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP I have enabled ICMP to www.google.com iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp -d 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -s 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT Ping works fine as below [root at firebox rc.d]# ping 64.233.189.104 PING 64.233.189.104 (

> > > [root at host ~]# mkdir /graphs > > Now, The question is how to mount it. Do i need to reboot both machines? > > Or without rebooting, How to get it worked. > > Thnaks ALL, > I got it up and running. -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, I wrote a little python program that works with antispam plugin, to create or remove sieve rules based on "From:" of any e-mail that is moved to some folder configured in dovecot.conf. He works fine with "Felamimail" the email program of "eGroupware". After setup, is very simple: If an user move a message to "blocked" folder, is appended a rule in

Hi, I have not esatblished a working rsync config on my server, but have found one major problem in which i hope there is a solution to. I'm based in Norway, with scandinavian clients. Of course we use several "special characters" in our keymap, which is not supported in US keyboards etc. I know there is a better word for this, unfortunatly i can't remeber it, so i hope you

I'm only using the narrow-band encoder on my embedded system and have removed all references to the wide-band and ultra-wide band encoder functions and tables. They will be pulled in by the linker due to the references made by the structures in modes.c. Attached is a replacement modes.c for compiling out modes that are not in use for anyone who's interested. Also, I've removed the

Hello all I tried for a couple of days now to get our samba domain hooked up with an AD controller. I followed these instructions: http://www.msadfaq.de/wiki/ActiveDirectory/trust_relationship_samba_ad I've solved a couple of problems over the years but this is a hard nut to crack. The setup is as follows AD runs the domain BAUMANN (realm: baumann.local) samba runs the domain BAUMANN-GMBH

Hello, I''m having a very strange problem concerning traceroute and routing and didn''t know if lartc or netfilter would be the correct choice for asking. (so sorry if my question is misplaced) I have the following setup: public ip -- gw1 -- 172.16.0.1 --- 172.16.0.2/and public ip''s --- gw2 --- switch --users (public and private ip addresses; ip-user-pub) from the

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 8d044975056f6e1f7485a62cd8309f49 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.i386.rpm Source: 12a273e76a16f11869981bde05d35831 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 55faf2478a5db7379ef455523f2e0cad traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 12a273e76a16f11869981bde05d35831 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: f6e26bd969eaa53861500b22804f140a traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.i386.rpm Source: a44d3ee8852b4931e777680e97602cc4 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9b2f0df9e44e596cec2585e413847f8d traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: a44d3ee8852b4931e777680e97602cc4 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got this strange thing: I setup a openvpn link between two openwrts. NetA: 192.168.2.0/24 NetB: 192.168.0.0/24 In netA there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.2.44, with domain name branch.abc.com In netB there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.0.44, with domain name abc.com I setup both DNS server to be a slave server of each other

Hi everybody, Right now, we are blocking pings and traceroutes to our website. But, in order for our members to test the connection when they are experiencing slow browsing, we are thinking about unblocking them... Are there still any security issues (flooding, etc...) in enabling them or is that an old problem fixed a long time ago? Thanks, JD

Is there a traceroute equivalent in the VoIP world? I would like to see the route a call takes after it gets to the gateway. Basically showing all the hops until it reaches it's destination or PSTN termination. -Dave

My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. I know four commands that let you set an IP

Seems like the message got filtered on BUGTRAQ, I'd still think at least some of the people on this list may have an interest in parts of the data below. Cheers. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 06:11:54 +0300 (EET DST) From: Ville <viha@cryptlink.net> To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: Linux traceroute (oddness & localhost memory-alloc) Hi.

hello there, im running a 3interface inet, dmz, loc. i have some public ip addresses. one public address is the router of the provider, the second one is the linux box running shorewall. all other public interfaces are on the dmz nic with proxy-arp. now whenever i do a traceroute (the dmz boxes are windows, icmp traceroute) the very first hop gets timeout/stars, then the router of the provider

Hi you all guys/girls from this list, I almost never use email lists, but this problem is driving me crazy. I use shorewall for a long time ( since version 1.2.x) but now I use it where I work, and here we now have 4 different ISP for redundance and because it''s cheaper then 1 ISP and a bigger link. 3 of 4 ISP I have no problems, but on the 4th ISP here goes my problem : I have a

I have a shorewall 2.0.14 running on a single interface machine (nwww in the log below) that is attempting to be well screwed down. The policy file reads:- #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST fw net DROP info net all DROP info # The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST all all