similar to: netfilter vulnerability?

Hello everyone, I have the following problem, I have a dataframes that looks like this: fire$Year fire$Size 1 1981 1738.0 2 1984 2228.1 3 1985 38963.3 4 1986 2223.4 5 1987 3594.6 6 1988 1520.0 ... What I would like to do is copy the values from the fire$Size colum and put it into a new df but with "0" for the years that are missing. The

Hello Andrew, > Do you actually have any ethernet interfaces up? Why are you not > binding Samba to that? I do, but I run multiple samba servers on one machine. I have a few active directory controllers bound on a per VLAN basis to different interfaces. And one additional samba just for shares that should serve all VLANs. That is why I have the 10.10.10.1 on the lo interface. I use that

Hola, colegas, compañeros y maestros. Es una tontería... que no atino a preguntarsela bien a Google. Tengo unos datos a los que si en consola les digo: > sum(dtk$V9) [1] 37790 devuelve. Pero si eso mismo se lo digo en RMarkdown con código on line, lease `r sum(dtk$V9)` me devuelve un numero horroroso: 3.77910^{4} entre el texto Qué, para colmo, ocupa más carácteres que el que no me imprime.

I have purchased a license for Vexira MailArmor (an antivirus product) and the good news is that it is installed and working at shorewall.net. The bad news is that I have yet to get Vexira running together with SpamAssassin :-( As things currently stand, list posts will be protected from viruses but may contain Spam. I''ll continue to work to correct this situation. -Tom -- Tom Eastep

Hello Rowland, > Stop me if I am wrong (and I often am), but doesn't the 'loopback' > device do exactly that ? Anything 'lo' receives on its input just gets > shoved out of its output, or to put it another way, it just goes > around in a circle, so how does this work with Samba etc ? Not saying > it will not work, trying to understand how it works if it does

Hello lartc, Testing some rules I found out that any rules are slowing down large pings! For example: tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 100Mbit prio 1 ceil 100Mbit tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:2 htb rate 100Mbit prio 2 ceil 100Mbit tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:0 prio 5 u32 \ match ip src 10.10.10.1 \ match ip

my network: local pc(192.168.1.2)-->openwrt_adsl_router A( 192.168.1.1/24&11.22.33.44pppoe&10.10.10.1/24 tinc)<---remote B: 10.10.20.1/24 ^ | remote C:10.10.0.1/24 all running tinc 1.0.x, ADSL router

Hello, my smb.conf is: [global] workgroup = DIRECTORY interfaces = 10.10.10.1 security = user map to guest = Bad User rndc command = /bin/true [iso] comment = ISO browseable = No public = Yes guest only = Yes writable = No directory = /export/ISO I'm using Debian 9.5 with samba version

I''m trying to enable tftp traffic initiated from our dmz network to our internal network. I have: TFTP(ACCEPT) dmz loc:10.10.10.1 in /etc/shorewall/rules, and: oadmodule nf_conntrack_tftp in /etc/shorewall/modules. The module is loaded and I do see some entries come and go, e.g.: udp 17 10 src=4.28.99.164 dst=10.10.10.1 sport=2071 dport=69 [UNREPLIED]

I'm having trouble getting port forwarding working on my one box. I have 2 incoming internet connections. I have 2 servers on these connections. pubinternet privinternet eth0:x.x.x.x eth0:y.y.y.y eth1:10.10.10.1 eth1:10.10.10.4 I need to be able to port forward traffic

yes, I have these in C host file: Subnet=10.10.0.0/24 Subnet=0.0.0.0/1 Subnet=128.0.0.0/1 ## not metioned, because I think is maybe works in same as 0.0.0.0/1 B host file doesn't have 0.0.0.0/1 and 128.0.0.0/1 I only added one route to 5.6.7.8 via B, not via C On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Maxim Vorontsov <6012030 at gmail.com> wrote: > hi. > > Are you add only

Hi. I want to drop silently locally generated packets on a specific interface. I tried 2 approaches: tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1: proto ip u32 match ip dst 10.10.10.1 flowid 1:1 police conform-exceed drop/drop tc qdisc del dev eth0 root tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: prio bands 2 priomap 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Driver chan_h323.so ---- If extension is exten => 0119823,1,dial(h323/0119823@10.10.10.1) then dial is OK: Executing Dial("SCCP/goran-00000002", "h323/0119823@10.10.10.1") in new stack ---- But if extension are something like: exten => _011xxxx,1,dial(h323/10.10.10.1/${exten:3}) exten => _011xxxx,1,dial(h323/${exten:3}@10.10.10.1) exten =>

hi all friends has tc filter an priority of rules , like iptables, let me explain it : with iptables, when the packet find a rule to go, it doesnt see the rest of rules, and how is the behavior of tc filter ?? see it : one packet from 10.10.10.1:2421 going to 11.11.11.1:110 what rule above it will be shaped ?? 1 ) tc filter add dev eth0 protocol ip parent 1:0 prio 1 u32 match ip src

Hi: First of all, thanks for this great piece of software! I found very clear the presentation sheets used at Linux Expo, Amsterdam. :-) About my problem, I setup everything to connect our two boxes. If I type 'ifconfig' I can see them up. Also the routes. ISIvirtual - Our firewall (iptables) which connects to the Internet through ADSL with a public dynamic IP. (the SSL client)

Hi all ! I have a PDC and a BDC in 2 differents subnets. I would like to sync their browse list but it doesn't seem to work. Actually here are a part my smb.conf files : PDC ------------------------------ ... remote browse sync = 10.10.20.10 remote announce = 10.10.20.10 security = user encrypt passwords = true domain logons = Yes os level = 70 preferred master = yes domain master = yes

Hello, I have a linux box with the following S/W versions: CentOS release 5.2 (Final) Linux ns.hostname.ro 2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 19:32:05 EDT 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Version 3.0.28-1.el5_2.1 My server has 2 IP interfaces, eth0: with the public ip address and br0: for the private subnet. Br0 being a bridge ip interface between eth1 and tap0 ( for openvpn ). Now my

Our setup: server running shorewal 4.5.2.2 and watchguard vpn appliance. VPN appliance was supplied by our document flow provider. I want to route traffic to 192.168.2.0/24 via 10.10.10.1 gateway. So I thought it would be a good idea to set it up as another ISP in the providers file. But when I enable it I can reach 192.168.2.0/24 subnet but not internet. Can you please tell what I am doing

I want to configure a device with three network interfaces where two of them would bridge two segments of the LAN subnet and the third one would be connected to the WAN link. eth0 - 10.10.10.2/24 to be connected to the internet gateway having IP 10.10.10.1/24 (also the default gateway for the device) eth1 and eth2 bridged as br0 with IP address 172.16.100.1 connected to different segments of the

Is it possible to somehow build this rule, where net could be any IP on the net? /etc/shorewall/masq #INTERFACE SUBNET ADDRESS PROTO PORT(S) eth3:10.10.10.7 net 10.10.10.1 Thanks, David