similar to: Fwd: Re: Fwd: HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Fwd: Re: Fwd: HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES"

2007 Feb 20
0
Fwd: Fwd: HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES(SLOVED)
Hi all, That issue is over now. I found why my ESTABLISHED,RELATED rule at the top of INPUT chain did not work for udp and icmp. The reason was I have included the protocol as tcp as below iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j ACCEPT I removed -p tcp from above rule. Now it works for all protocols. Thanks for your support. ---------- Forwarded message
2007 Jul 10
0
bind issue on centos 5 (SOLVED)
Hi everyone, Finally, I got it solved. The issue was my named.conf file. pls see below. zone "example77.com " IN { type master; file "master/example77.com.zone"; }; The below error happened Jul 5 15:50:32 gateway named[3548]: master/example77.com.zone:11: > example77.com\032: bad owner name (check-names) in the above zone line, between example.com ,
2007 Feb 17
2
HOW to enable traceroute with IPTABLES
Hi, I am setting up a firewall on CENTOS 4.4. I have done default block iptables -P INPUT DROP iptables -P FORWARD DROP iptables -P OUTPUT DROP I have enabled ICMP to www.google.com iptables -A OUTPUT -p icmp -d 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT iptables -A INPUT -p icmp -s 64.233.189.104 -j ACCEPT Ping works fine as below [root at firebox rc.d]# ping 64.233.189.104 PING 64.233.189.104 (
2005 Jan 10
5
Traceroute unblocking, single interface, policy drop
I have a shorewall 2.0.14 running on a single interface machine (nwww in the log below) that is attempting to be well screwed down. The policy file reads:- #SOURCE DEST POLICY LOG LEVEL LIMIT:BURST fw net DROP info net all DROP info # The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST all all
2006 Apr 02
4
64 bit
Hello, Presently I am considering using CentOS as my base OS. I am wondering about a few things though. I like KVirc as my irc program. I have had issue with compiling it in 64bit mode under Fedora 3 and was todl it was because Fedora installs both 32 and 64 bit libs and the compiler didn't understnad which to use. Will this be an issue with CentOS 4 also? If I install the 64 bit
2000 Jul 31
0
Linux traceroute (oddness & localhost memory-alloc)
Seems like the message got filtered on BUGTRAQ, I'd still think at least some of the people on this list may have an interest in parts of the data below. Cheers. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2000 06:11:54 +0300 (EET DST) From: Ville <viha@cryptlink.net> To: bugtraq@securityfocus.com Subject: Linux traceroute (oddness & localhost memory-alloc) Hi.
2008 Aug 21
0
VPN traceroute is not consistent/ Bind cannot transfer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I've got this strange thing: I setup a openvpn link between two openwrts. NetA: 192.168.2.0/24 NetB: 192.168.0.0/24 In netA there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.2.44, with domain name branch.abc.com In netB there is a mail server + DNS: 192.168.0.44, with domain name abc.com I setup both DNS server to be a slave server of each other
2004 Sep 22
0
traceroute misbehaviour on dual-home using -i or -s
My Linux workstation (Mandrake 10.1 kernel 2.6.8.1) is dual-homed to two ADSL Internet providers. Card eth0 (192.168.9.250) is the default route and leads to an SMC router (192.168.9.254). Card eth1 (192.168.1.250) leads to a Linksys router (192.168.1.1). I''m not doing any NAT or PPPoE in the workstation - the SMC and Linksys handle it all. I know four commands that let you set an IP
2002 Sep 10
2
Traceroute
How do I allow traceroute to reach my server? Pings work fine but traceroute stops at the last hop before my server. If I shut off the firewall it reaches it fine. PING danicar.net (24.222.246.120): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=0 ttl=237 time=104.0 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=1 ttl=237 time=74.9 ms 64 bytes from 24.222.246.120: icmp_seq=2 ttl=237 time=90.6
2004 Jul 27
2
icmp traceroute from dmz behind proxy-arp - icmp code 11 ?
hello there, im running a 3interface inet, dmz, loc. i have some public ip addresses. one public address is the router of the provider, the second one is the linux box running shorewall. all other public interfaces are on the dmz nic with proxy-arp. now whenever i do a traceroute (the dmz boxes are windows, icmp traceroute) the very first hop gets timeout/stars, then the router of the provider
2005 Jan 06
0
Wierd traceroute/routing problem
Hello, I''m having a very strange problem concerning traceroute and routing and didn''t know if lartc or netfilter would be the correct choice for asking. (so sorry if my question is misplaced) I have the following setup: public ip -- gw1 -- 172.16.0.1 --- 172.16.0.2/and public ip''s --- gw2 --- switch --users (public and private ip addresses; ip-user-pub) from the
2011 Apr 28
0
CEEA-2011:0469 CentOS 5 i386 traceroute FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 8d044975056f6e1f7485a62cd8309f49 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.i386.rpm Source: 12a273e76a16f11869981bde05d35831 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny Hughes
2011 Apr 28
0
CEEA-2011:0469 CentOS 5 x86_64 traceroute FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 55faf2478a5db7379ef455523f2e0cad traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: 12a273e76a16f11869981bde05d35831 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Johnny
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:0469 CentOS 5 i386 traceroute Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: f6e26bd969eaa53861500b22804f140a traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.i386.rpm Source: a44d3ee8852b4931e777680e97602cc4 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir Singh
2011 Sep 22
0
CEBA-2011:0469 CentOS 5 x86_64 traceroute Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2011:0469 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2011-0469.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9b2f0df9e44e596cec2585e413847f8d traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.x86_64.rpm Source: a44d3ee8852b4931e777680e97602cc4 traceroute-2.0.1-6.el5.src.rpm -- Karanbir
2006 Jun 06
6
Ping/Traceroute problem in 1 of 4 links
Hi you all guys/girls from this list, I almost never use email lists, but this problem is driving me crazy. I use shorewall for a long time ( since version 1.2.x) but now I use it where I work, and here we now have 4 different ISP for redundance and because it''s cheaper then 1 ISP and a bigger link. 3 of 4 ISP I have no problems, but on the 4th ISP here goes my problem : I have a
2006 Apr 27
4
Why?
Hello, I haven't installed anything other then what is in the Repos. Here are my Repo's: yum.repos.d $ cat atrpms.repo [atrpms] name= ATRPMS RPM Repository for Red Hat Enterprise Linux baseurl=http://dl.atrpms.net/el$releasever-$basearch/atrpms/stable gpgcheck=1 enabled=1 yum.repos.d $ cat CentOS-Base.repo # CentOS-Base.repo # # This file uses a new mirrorlist system developed by Lance
2004 Mar 17
4
Traceroute equivalent
Is there a traceroute equivalent in the VoIP world? I would like to see the route a call takes after it gets to the gateway. Basically showing all the hops until it reaches it's destination or PSTN termination. -Dave
2008 May 27
3
FireFox
Can anyone tell me if there are plans to update Firefox to the new 3.0 for Centos 4.5? Seems like only the 1.5 version has been placed in the repos and I think it should be time for an upgrade. If I'm looking in the wrong place let me know also. Thnx. -- Regards Robert Smile... it increases your face value! Linux User #296285 http://counter.li.org
2008 Nov 14
3
FreeBSD 6.3 gre and traceroute
Stephen Clark wrote: > Robert Noland wrote: >> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 07:48 -0500, Stephen Clark wrote: >>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>> Stephen Clark wrote: >>>>> Julian Elischer wrote: >>>>>> you will need to define the setup and question better. >>>> thanks.. cleaning it up a bit more... >>>> >>>>