similar to: what does this squid related error/message during setup mean?

Hello all, i am new to shorewall and i already have a question ;) i am running a mailserver in my dmz (or actually this will be when = evertything will be working fine with shorewall) with public ip = addresses.. i have a subnet of 8 ip addresses (255.255.255.248 mask) and = i was planning of the classic 3 nic (eth0-2) setup... the dmz should = work with proxy-arping...=20 now my quesion is

This is a minor release of Shorewall which rolls up a number of bug fixes. New features include: 1. A NEWNOTSYN option has been added to shorewall.conf. This option determines whether Shorewall accepts TCP packets which are not part of an established connection and that are not ''SYN'' packets (SYN flag on and ACK flag off). 2. The need for the

Hello all, a private ip 192.168.x.x win32 box will not connect with psftp (win32 sftp client) to an external public ip ssh/sftp server. but i can connect with console sftp client on my shorewall/unix box to that sftp/ssh server without any problems. i can also use putty (win32 ssh client) from the internal box. now i thought, sftp is also using the ssh port, and netstat on my firewall tells me

Hello All, I'm trying to do a fresh installation on Ubuntu Server 9.10 (Karmic) 64-bit but I am getting error when "make config" is trying to install the init script... Here is the output: - Can anyone help me please... Thanking in advance... Cheers, Nitesh ################################################### ### ### DAHDI tools installed successfully. ### If you have not done

since a few days i have a huge number of ips trying to access something on UDP port 10619... i have a shorewall running on a dynamic dsl provider, which gets a new ip every 24 hours, so maybe those ips are trying to access some service, but i doubt it... anyone seen some activity on udp 10619 lately? is there some new trojan, virus or something floating around? they are flooding the logs with

On Thursday 12 December 2013 14:49:36 Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, Pino Toscano wrote: > > What do you think? > > I think that your Should-Start handling is broken. Required means the > given file can not properly work without the listed servers, insserv > will error out. Should means it can very well work without them if > they are not present or enabled.

Package: xcp-squeezed Version: 1.3-13 Severity: serious User: debian-qa at lists.debian.org Usertags: piuparts piuparts.d.o Hi, during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install due to incorrect dependencies in the init.d LSB header. Some debian notes are available from at http://wiki.debian.org/LSBInitScripts From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...): Selecting

hai, ? Just an informational message and below the fixed for the problems..? ? when upgrading a member server with debian jessie with samba 4.1.17? with samba and winbind installed.? ? For me this was on?my print server. ? steps to take. ? setup the apt sources for sernet. ? install the sernet packages. apt-get install sernet-samba sernet-samba-winbind sernet-samba-common sernet-samba-libs

Hello, (sorry for the late reply, I was not involved in libugestfs until recently.) On Friday 21 September 2012 20:00:34 Olaf Hering wrote: > Currently firstboot would only work on redhat-based images. > Handle redhat-based, suse-based and debian guests, error out in case > of an unknown distro. > Update firstboot.sh: > - make sure scripts exists and can be executed > - add

Tom, I am NOT subscribed (yet). I dropped SuSeFirewall2 in favor of shorewall to get past the configuration hurdles I as experiencing. At the moment, when my SuSe 9.1 starts up, I can see shorewall processing the rules, policies, etc. and I see no errors and then moves on with the rest of the SuSe boot process . However, no traffic passes through using the rules. I run an iptables -L and I

Hello, I am trying to install libguestfs on a proxmox (debian jessie with some custom packages) and when I run make at a certain point I get this error: E: Can't find a source to download version '2.02.116-pve1' of 'lvm2:amd64' supermin: cd '/tmp/supermin3f8d1d.tmpdir/pzaggirn' && /usr/bin/apt-get download 'bsdmainutils' 'iproute2'

I don't know if there is some fault in compiling or a bug of the new R-1.7.0 version: cl.pam.2 <- pam(as.dist(1-cor(mel.data)),2) plot(cl.pam.2) perform a right partitioning and silhouette plot on the old R-1.6.2 instead "Error in clusplot.default(x$diss,...... ; x is not numeric" is the output on the new R-1.7.0. Same platform: RH8.0 i686. Some suggestions? A.S.

Hi all, Did anyone manage to make the GotoIf command work with regular expression ? I would like to make the following thing: ${DTMSeq} contains a menu choice. Only 1, 2 and 3 are allowed menu choices. If DTMFSeq contains 1 or 2 or 3 => OK, Goto 4 else Goto 2 I've tried the follwoing syntax but it is alway going to 2 whatever the value of DTMFSeq: exten =>

Dear R experts I have the follwoing data V1 V2 1 -5.8000000 0 2 -4.8000000 0 3 -2.8666667 0 4 -0.8666667 0 5 -0.7333333 0 6 -1.6666667 0 7 -0.1333333 1 8 1.2000000 1 9 1.3333333 1 and I want to know, whether V1 can predict V2: of course it can, since there is a perfect separation between cases 1..6 and 7..9 How can I test, whether this conclusion (being able to assign an

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.4.1-5 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, I tried to upgrade xen-utils-4.4 depending on xen-utils-common. Here is aptitude answer: ... Param?trage de xen-utils-common (4.4.1-5) ... insserv: Service xenstored has to be enabled to start service xendomains insserv: Service xenconsoled has to be enabled to start service xendomains insserv: exiting now!

we have several DELL R900 with PERC 6/E adapter in it. R900 using Redhat Linux. Each R900 have two PERC 6/E adapter and at least two MD1000 connect to it. Configuration 1: PERC 6/E -- two MD1000 PERC 6/E -- empty Configuration 2: PERC 6/E -- MD1000 PERC 6/E -- MD1000 Normally first MD1000 for database and second MD1000 for nightly backup. My

Currently firstboot would only work on redhat-based images. Handle redhat-based, suse-based and debian guests, error out in case of an unknown distro. Update firstboot.sh: - make sure scripts exists and can be executed - add LSB header to avoid insserv warnings later on - run script only if called with "start" Update functions, pass only required options. Signed-off-by: Olaf Hering

Given 2 GEPs as follows, %tmp124 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.termbox* %termptr.1, i32 0, i32 5, !dbg !1051 ; <[2 x i16]*> [#uses=1] %tmp125 = getelementptr inbounds [2 x i16]* %tmp124, i64 0, i64 0, !dbg !1051 ; <i16*> [#uses=1] can I replace the 2nd one with %tmp126 = getelementptr inbounds %struct.termbox* %termptr.1, i32 0, i32 5, i64 0, i64 0 ; <i16*> When I try to

Howdy R gurus ! I am newbie to R I use R 2.0.1 in Windows XP. When I run R I got the follwoing memory error. My physical memory size is 3 Gb. My R got the memory problem when it reached to about 2 Gb. Thanks in advance, > library(spdep) > sfr.lagsarlm <- lagsarlm(sfr.data$Bldgsqft ~ sfr.data$Ncounty + sfr.data$Nugb + sfr.data$Ngroup, data=sfr.data, listw=sfr.listw,

Hi Timo, please find attached a patch for the init script in the doc directory. * Added LSB-compliant info block (for insserv and friends) * Updated base_dir detection (for v2.0 config output) Regards, Pascal -- The trapper recommends today: decade.0932307 at localdomain.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dovecot-initd_LSB_header.patch