similar to: flac-dev Digest, Vol 191, Issue 7

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 3000 matches similar to: "flac-dev Digest, Vol 191, Issue 7"

2022 Sep 19
2
flac-dev Digest, Vol 191, Issue 7
Hi everyone, I'm back with the same issue as before: flac encoding on an M1 Max Macbook pro is much slower on an arm build of 1.4.0 than it is running through emulation on an x86_64 build. ./configure -enable-static -disable-shared CFLAGS=" -arch arm64 -isysroot /Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/MacOSX.platform/Developer/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk -mmacosx-version-min=10.9"
2023 Feb 27
1
flac-dev Digest, Vol 191, Issue 7
Hello again, Quick question about 1.4.2 source. When I comopiled the latest source back in September, I got the " Neon optimizations : ...................... yes" output. When I compile the official 1.4.2 source, there's nothing about Neon. Has this just been removed from the output, or is the official 1.4.2 missing something? Thanks, Scott On Mon, Sep 19, 2022 at 4:15?PM Scott
2013 May 06
2
flac-dev Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7
Ralph, for Mac OS you should download either the Unarchiver which is free, or Entrophy which is what I use, but it costs like $15 I believe, both support decompressing .7z and Entrophy supports compressing TO .7z On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:00 PM, <flac-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Send flac-dev mailing list submissions to > flac-dev at xiph.org > > To subscribe or
2016 Dec 10
2
Do we need a pre-release?
Am 08.12.2016 um 20:44 schrieb Brian Willoughby: > On Dec 8, 2016, at 12:59 AM, Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 12/08/16 12:24 AM, Thomas Zander wrote: >>> On 7 December 2016 at 21:08, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: >>>> lvqcl.mail wrote: >>>> >>>>> "make -f Makefile.lite" also
2013 May 07
0
flac-dev Digest, Vol 102, Issue 7
It's not that hard to repackage it, is it? Here you go: www.icer.nl/misc_stuff/flac.xcodeproj .zip On 06-05-13 23:37, Marcus Johnson wrote: > Ralph, for Mac OS you should download either the Unarchiver which is > free, or Entrophy which is what I use, but it costs like $15 I > believe, both support decompressing .7z and Entrophy supports > compressing TO .7z > > > On
2016 Dec 11
1
Do we need a pre-release?
Am 11.12.2016 um 00:05 schrieb lvqcl.mail: > Robert Kausch wrote: > >> The main issues were inclusion of non-existing Makefile.deps > > It does exist in git, but not in flac-1.3.2pre1.tar.xz. > > (Here's the list of all files that exist in git but not in > the pre-release tarball: > > .gitignore > Makefile.deps > ci\flac-autotool.sh > doc\isoflac.txt
2015 Oct 12
2
Use of alloca in vorbis_comment_add_tag
Dear Vorbis devs, I'm Robert Kausch, author of fre:ac - free audio converter. Please consider using _ogg_malloc/_ogg_free in place of alloca in vorbis_comment_add_tag. alloca will cause undefined behaviour/crashing when it causes a stack overflow which can easily happen when adding cover art in a METADATA_BLOCK_PICTURE comment. I had a user trying to convert a FLAC file with a 2 MB
2016 Dec 11
2
1.3.2pre2
Hi all, New pre-release here is at: http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre2-win.zip http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre2.tar.xz Changes: * Fix PACKAGE_VERSION in MSVS project files. * Fix Makefile.lite in tarball (make test is still failiing). MD5 and SHA256 sums: > md5sum flac-1.3.2pre2* e276e3a9e99ae07f4bd25278f533b9e5 flac-1.3.2pre2.tar.xz
2014 Jun 03
1
Two questions about RG in flac
On 6/3/14, Robert Kausch <robert.kausch at freac.org> wrote: > Am 03.06.2014 16:45, schrieb lvqcl: >> 2) to ALL: >> I attached a small program. Compile and run it. >> * Does it work correctly when compiled with -O3 -msse2 options? >> * If yes, does it work correctly when compiled with -O3 -funroll-loops >> -msse2 options? >> ( and what is the version
2016 Dec 11
0
1.3.2pre2
Am 11.12.2016 um 11:35 schrieb Erik de Castro Lopo: > New pre-release here is at: > > http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre2-win.zip > http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre2.tar.xz > > Changes: > > * Fix PACKAGE_VERSION in MSVS project files. > * Fix Makefile.lite in tarball (make test is still failiing). Thank you for providing a second preview!
2016 Dec 22
1
1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 12:19:21AM +0000, oresteszoupanos at hotmail.com wrote: > > For what it's worth, I tested both the 32- and 64-bit flac.exe's on my > Windows 10, with about 45 WAV files I have. > > Got some warnings about unexpected metadata, but the audio was encoded > fine. Using the --keep-foreign-metadata flag cleared those warnings. Excellent! Do you
2014 Jun 03
4
Two questions about RG in flac
1) to the author of test/test_replaygain.sh There are 2 identical lines in this file: line 137 and next. Is it intended or just a copy/paste error? 2) to ALL: I attached a small program. Compile and run it. * Does it work correctly when compiled with -O3 -msse2 options? * If yes, does it work correctly when compiled with -O3 -funroll-loops -msse2 options? ( and what is the version of your
2016 Dec 08
2
Do we need a pre-release?
On 12/08/16 12:24 AM, Thomas Zander wrote: > On 7 December 2016 at 21:08, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+la at mega-nerd.com> wrote: >> lvqcl.mail wrote: >> >>> "make -f Makefile.lite" also doesn't work out of box. >> >> Didn't work for the 1.3.1 release either. Makes me wonder why we even >> keep it around. > > Because it works on
2016 Dec 07
1
Seek failure with very short files
Hi all, Thanks in advance for your help, and sorry for the slow reply. I've created a small OS X example project <https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B8vFUUth7NpvRFI0MmI2bVJNNEU/view?usp=sharing> that reproduces the issue. (I've run into the size limit for emails on this list so I've put it on Google Drive.) The program just initializes a libFLAC++ stream decoder for a given file
2016 Dec 21
11
1.3.2pre3 (Hopefully final)
Hi all, New pre-release here is at: http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip http://mega-nerd.com/tmp/flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz Changes: * Fix tests with Makefile.lite build system. * Fixes for non-Intel CPUs. MD5 and SHA256 sums: > md5sum flac-1.3.2pre3* 61aa8597a220303daf4beb2b8756979d flac-1.3.2pre3.tar.xz 8b470ceac02340600db73bc6daea4fc7 flac-1.3.2pre3-win.zip
2013 May 25
4
Bug fix and compatibility patches for 1.3.0pre4
On 25.5.2013 10:54, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Robert Kausch wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I tried 1.3.0pre4 with ICL on Windows and found some issues. Not sure if >> this is the right place to submit patches, but someone suggested this on >> the apparently dead SourceForge patch tracker. >> >> The first two are quite straight forward: >>
2017 May 10
4
max size for album art?
Is there any size limitation for album art? I have a user who says adding large artwork (from a scanner) is corrupting the file metadata. I don't know if this is a flac limitation, a tag lib issue, or something I'm doing. Thanks, Scott -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:
2017 May 10
1
max size for album art?
Pierre-Yves Thoulon wrote: > None, apart from the standard metadata block size limitation (2^24 > bytes, e.g. 4GB). Pretty big for any kind of album art... 2^24 = 16777216, i.e. only 16 Megabytes. > Kind regards. > > Pyt. > > >> Le 10 mai 2017 à 17:11, Scott Brown - scottcbrown at gmail.com >> <flac-dev.pyt.8c0cc6600b.scottcbrown#gmail.com at
2013 May 04
5
Bug fix and compatibility patches for 1.3.0pre4
Hi all, I tried 1.3.0pre4 with ICL on Windows and found some issues. Not sure if this is the right place to submit patches, but someone suggested this on the apparently dead SourceForge patch tracker. The first two are quite straight forward: - The ICL patch fixes a typo in bitmath.h and adds FLAC__bitwriter_write_zeroes to the external declarations in bitwriter.c. - The Ogg patch replaces
2014 Jul 26
1
1.21 vs 1.3 encoding speed
Please cc: the results from dev list back here though I would run some tests on a diff platform but don't have access to my PC for a few weeks Would also be interesting to see what decoding stats you get > On Jul 25, 2014, at 7:38 AM, Scott Brown <scottcbrown at gmail.com> wrote: > > I will post to the dev list, sorry about that. > > To give an idea, though, at flac