similar to: Upnp ( linux-igd) on bering

Hello Tom, I tried the new UPnP support of shorewall, olny to stumble upon a LinuxIGD bug. Specificaly, the UPnP chain is read as UPn from the upnpd.conf . I double checked it, there some bug in the upnpd, it doesn''t process 4 lettered names correctly. Could you change this chains'' name to something a little longer? -- Costas Cavouracis <cca@freemail.gr> My PGP keys:

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.4 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2/shorewall-2.2.4 Problems Corrected: 1. The error message: Error: No appropriate chain for zone <z1> to zone <z2> has been changed to one that is more self-explanatory: Error: No policy defined for zone <z1> to zone <z2> 2. When only an

Hi, I''m implementing a linux router with this characteristics: - Multiple adsl with each public ip''s - Multiple LAN ethernets (in a bridge). - Linux IGD I have successfully implemented de 2 first steps, the adsl balanced fine (multipath routing), and the clients bridge fine. My problem is how to use that with linux-igd. My LAN bridge has STP and is implemented for

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:04:20PM +0000, Etienne Dechamps wrote: > Unfortunately, I often notice that even with the advanced UDP hole > punching mechanisms that tinc uses, I still come across cases on my > network where two nodes behind NATs cannot talk to each other because > one of the nodes is behind a "strict" NAT [...]. This type of NAT > will stop any UDP hole

Hi Guus, Unfortunately, I often notice that even with the advanced UDP hole punching mechanisms that tinc uses, I still come across cases on my network where two nodes behind NATs cannot talk to each other because one of the nodes is behind a "strict" NAT that won't use consistent source ports for UDP packets that are sent to different destination addresses. More formally, this

I have been using the LEAF Bering firewall for a year or so. It boots with Syslinux 1.75. But Bering is too large for a 1440KB floppy, so it formats the diskette as 1680KB. Recently I found a small Compaq 2266 box to replace a larger Compaq 7170 to run the firewall. But when I try to boot the Bering diskette on the 2266 I get the following message: Loading Linux ............ Boot failed:

On 11 November 2015 at 21:57, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote: > it is entirely possible to write code that uses threads on Win32 and forks > on POSIX by abstracting the communication bits generically. Signalling could > work over pipes on both. > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365152(v=vs.85).aspx Hum... yes of course, but I

fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> writes: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) >

Does anyone know a PPPoE Server for Bering ? I don''t know anything about Bering (a quick search shows an Internet Firewall device and Floppy distro...) but anyways; I have had luck with RP-PPPoE (http://www.roaringpenguin.com/products/rp-pppoe/) which does include a PPPoE server. I have my pppd patched to support RADIUS so that it can talk to my FreeRadius rig in the testing lab.... IF

On 12 November 2015 at 21:29, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:04:20PM +0000, Etienne Dechamps wrote: >> According to an online NAT check service, around 50% of NATs in the >> wild have this problem, making this a very real issue: >> http://nattest.net.in.tum.de/results.php > > Are you referring to port restricted NAT in the

On 12 November 2015 at 01:15, fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> wrote: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though.

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > miniupnpc only provides a blocking API, there is no way to > integrate it into an event loop. That pretty much means we will need > to run the UPnP code in a separate thread. Which means using pthreads > on POSIX, and then we would either have a dependency on pthreads-Win32 > on Windows, or

Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: > (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved > simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client > process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very > user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) something like this :P

Has anyone successfully got UPnP and Shorewall working together ? If so, has anyone created documentation on how to get it working ? Thanks in advance, Mark

I'm trying to run Asset UPnP media server under Wine 1.1.27 on Ubuntu 8.04. The problem is that media clients on the same network don't appear to SSDP discover this media server. The server itself *does* advertise itself fine on the network though (but as this is fairly infrequent, then any clients can be hanging around for quite some time before they spot the server). I've tried

Hello, I'm looking for ipPhone and ATA with UPNP and perhaps also STUN auto provisioning via https or . G729 If someone know a good product.. Thanks Laurent -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20060608/efca9a57/attachment.htm

On 5/10/2021 1:33 PM, Chuck Zmudzinski wrote: > Package: src:linux > Version: 5.10.28-1 > Severity: normal > Tags: upstream > > Dear Maintainer, > > I have been using Xen's PCI and VGA passthrough feature since wheezy and jessie were the stable versions, and back then both Windows HVMs and Linux HVMs would function with the Intel Integrated Graphics Device (IGD), the

Hi, Please refer to attached IGD VGA passthrough patches. There are only 2 text files attached in this email, ie. igd2of3.patch and igd3of3.patch. Thank you very much. -- Yours sincerely, Singapore Citizen Mr. Teo En Ming (Zhang Enming) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Hello, I have this message in syslog that I'd like to ignore: === Apr 5 15:31:37 server77 upnpd[11728]: TimerThreadRemove failed! === I use these rules to ignore it in a file located in ignore.d.server (which contains some other rules which work): === ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+ upnpd\[[0-9]+\]: TimerThreadRemove failed!$ ^\w{3} [ :0-9]{11} [._[:alnum:]-]+

[Note: This message has also been sent to ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org & puppet-openstack@puppetlabs.com] Hi, I''m currently working on writing a Puppet module for Ceph. As after some research I found no existing module, I''ll start from scratch but I would be glad to hear from people who would already have started working or this or having any idea or pointers regarding this