similar to: How do I create a clean build environment?

Hi all, If I try yum grouplist "FTP Server" I get the next large output: Dependencies Resolved ============================================================================= Package Arch Version Repository Size ============================================================================= Installing: OpenIPMI x86_64

After a yum update (yesterday), I am now unable to install any rpm package. An example of the error message is duplicated below: %pre(VMwareWorkstation-5.0.0-13124.i386) scriptlet failed, exit status 255 error: install: %pre scriptlet failed (2), skipping VMwareWorkstation-5.0.0-13124 Could anyone help? Thanks in advance.

This was working in 5.1 - I am now getting errors when I try to run a flash video in seamonkey under CetnOS 5.2. Here is the error: For application/x-shockwave-flash found plugin /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/npwrapper.libflashplayer.so sh: /usr/lib/nspluginwrapper/i386/linux/npviewer: No such file or directory Here is what I have installed: $rpm -qa | grep -i nsplugin

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

As the subject of nspluginwrapper came up recently, it might be worth mentioning that it's not properly documented. The README seems to be the official nspluginwrapper README, which, oddly enough, states that it's used with the command nspluginwrapper However, RedHat based systems seem to all use mozilla-config-plugin. (I'm not sure about other distributions--FreeBSD uses the more

Hi, I have the x86_64 arch on my server so therfore i expect that yum updates only x86_64 packages. With the last *yum update* i?ve noticed a strange behaviour while retrieving the needed packeges. As you you see, yum wants install packages for different architectures: glibc x86_64 2.3.4-2.25 base 4.9 M glibc i686 2.3.4-2.25 base 5.1 M . .

]# yum update Loading "priorities" plugin Loading "fastestmirror" plugin Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.hmc.edu * updates: mirrors.versaweb.com * kbs-CentOS-Extras: centos.karan.org * extras: centos-distro.cavecreek.net Excluding Packages in global exclude list Finished Excluding Packages from CentOS-5 - Base Finished Excluding Packages from

Hello everyone, I run a 64bit system here and install flash plugins for firefox using nspluginwrapper. I get the movies but there is no sound. Flashplayer is: flash-plugin-9.0.48.0-release.i386.rpm nspluginwrappers are: nspluginwrapper-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm nspluginwrapper-i386-0.9.91.5-1.x86_64.rpm Any help in tracking this down would be great. Thnx. -- Regards Robert Smile...

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0445 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0445.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) x86_64: 9af9ec99c79f925b8968c765e97090a2 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.i386.rpm c75510fec94560c8e6437e1af0e8c73d nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.x86_64.rpm Source:

Hello, I just searched the wiki for info about NSPluginWrapper. It's a plugin for Firefox which creates a kind of bridge between i386-plugins and a x86_64 browser. That aside... Well, looking for the string "NSPluginWrapper" and doing a text-search, the only hit is the Japanese version of the Release Notes!? I don't understand any of the text, but I interpret that the

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2010:0445 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2010-0445.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( md5sum Filename ) i386: 685f09b105aa75596ebde5991fddbac0 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.i386.rpm Source: d9409719dc49d9c35b1a1a7e6fe23631 nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-9.el5.src.rpm --

I was wondering if anyone else had this problem. I run CentOS 5.2 x86_64 on my workstation at home. Since 5.2 came out with nepluginwrapper bundled into it, none of my plugins work. I thought it was just a problem with the flash plugin, but neither the mplayerplug-in plugins nor the adobe acrobat reader plugin work, either. I have this problem both with the Seamonkey contributed 64-bit build

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc12.tar.gz.sig Since rc11 has problems compiling with BSDs, here's a new release. Just two changes: - rc11 didn't compile with some compilers - default_mail_env fallbacking was broken with --exec-mail Here's also again the rc11 changes: * Renamed default_mail_env to mail_location.

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc12.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc12.tar.gz.sig Since rc11 has problems compiling with BSDs, here's a new release. Just two changes: - rc11 didn't compile with some compilers - default_mail_env fallbacking was broken with --exec-mail Here's also again the rc11 changes: * Renamed default_mail_env to mail_location.

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc11.tar.gz.sig Hopefully the last RC release? As far as I know there are no major problems left now. If nothing big shows up, v1.0 should be out in a couple of weeks. * Renamed default_mail_env to mail_location. default_mail_env still works for backwards compatibility. * deliver: When sending

http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/dovecot-1.0.rc11.tar.gz.sig Hopefully the last RC release? As far as I know there are no major problems left now. If nothing big shows up, v1.0 should be out in a couple of weeks. * Renamed default_mail_env to mail_location. default_mail_env still works for backwards compatibility. * deliver: When sending

Has anyone else noticed this? I've been running a self-built, working 64-bit version of Seamonkey's 2.01a pre-release (alpha) version for the last six or seven months (because the "contributed" unofficial 64-bit build didn't work right and the official 32-bit release crashed all the time), and it's been working relatively well until recently, particularly in the area of

I just ran into a build failure on Dovecot 1.0RC11 on FreeBSD 6.1. Identical command sequence for the build worked fine for RC10. uname -a: FreeBSD thor.krellis.org 6.1-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p5 #0: Fri Sep 1 01:47:32 EDT 2006 root at jail7.jvds.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/JAIL7 i386 Configured with a straight ./configure, no options, no problems reported during configure, but make

http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc11.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/1.1/rc/dovecot-1.1.rc11.tar.gz.sig This is the final v1.1 RC. Tomorrow I'll change only the version number, update the documentation and call it v1.1.0. But please test this anyway to make sure I didn't happen to break anything since rc10 :) - dovecot-uidlist is now recreated if it results in file