similar to: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_unclean

Harald Welte just announced that the 2.6 Kernels will not support the ''unclean'' match extension except via Patch-O-Matic. Since I have a polciy of not supporting Netfilter features that are only available in P-O-M, I will be removing the ''logunclean'' and ''dropunclean'' interface options from Shorewall. In 1.4.7, a warning will be issued if

Hello, If I set my network interface to have "logunclean" along with "dhcp,norfc1918,routefilter,noping,tcpflags", then when I connect to http://welcome.hp.com/country/us/eng/support.htm and choose any of the product I get this. logpkt:LOG:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:a0:cc:5b:09:5f:00:08:e2:32:34:70:08:00 SRC=192.151.11.205 DST=24.24.243.178 LEN=80 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=239 ID=14025

Hey all- Trying to run sh 1.2.8 and iptables 1.2.5 on my linux 2.4.17 box. I build the kernel from kernel.org sources, and then patched it with iptables 1.2.5 by doing %make pending-patches KERNEL_DIR=/usr/src/linux I let it run and patched these: Welcome to Rusty''s Patch-o-matic! Each patch is a new feature: many have minimal impact, some do not. Almost every one has bugs, so I

Hello! I have a problem using shorewall on an aliased interface. Let me give you a short description of the setup: eth0 uses DHCP and will be assigned a 10.38.0.0/16 address by my ISP; I use a host-route to access their PPTP on 10.0.0.138 with "pptp 10.0.0.138" ppp0 is the Internetconnection then (duh) At the same time I want to connect the box to my LAN using 10.1.0.0/16 or any

Hello, I run Shorewall 2.0.3a backport on a debian woody box (with 2.4.18 homemade kernel). When I start shorewall I got the following errors. Oct 30 11:13:12 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_conntrack Oct 30 11:13:17 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_pkttype Oct 30 11:13:18 fwr modprobe: modprobe: Can''t locate module ipt_pkttype Oct 30

Hello everyone, I've been experiencing many problems recently with windows software parsing large text files stored on a samba share (smb version 3.6.3 on ubuntu12.04). The software, which are running on windows XP stations, are crashing quite often. I notice this in the log.smbd at the time of the crash: [2012/08/28 17:25:21.980609, 3] smbd/server.c:629(smbd_parent_housekeeping) Printcap

Thanks for the tip using a smoothing technique before plotiing in order to get a curve instead of a line connecting the observations. But that's not the solution for my main problem with the "unclean" line plot. In order to show my problem let's take this simple example: > xval <- c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) > yval <- c(10, 30, 40, 50, 70, 90, 100, 110) > plot

Hi, I''m trying to get RAdmin [uses tcp 4889] access to my Windows machine which is behind my firewall. I have zones: gbl : the world loc : my lan fw : firewall I placed the following in my rules file DNAT gbl loc:192.168.0.2 tcp 4889 - When trying to RAdmin I get a cannot conect to server error. 192.168.0.2 is my Windows Machines IP address. Can anyone help me? Shorewall 1.3.9b

Suppose I have the latest and greatest e2fsprogs. >From reading the docs I understand that 1) boot ext3, clean umount - you can remount ext3 or ext2 2) boot ext3, unclean umount - you can remount ext3 - you can e2fsck and remount ext2 Does this mean that normal linux init script e2fsck will do it, in case fstab says ext2? Or you should make sure to run e2fsck by hand with -f? 3) boot

That seems to be the indication given by this webpage http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/ext3/ext3-usage.html However, default install of Redhat 7.2 setsup fs_passno(6th field of /etc/fstab) as 2 which asks you if you want to run fsck after an unclean shutdown The question is, is fsck required after an unclean shutdown or should one just rely on journal replay. What does fsck do when it sees an

I apologize for the first message. :) --------------------------------------- I have an FTP server running in the DMZ section of my home network. It uses port 23000 for connection and ports 19990 to 19994 for data transfer. I have setup the following rule for outside people to connect to it: DNAT net dmz:192.168.2.2 tcp 23000 I''m at work right now and I can''t use

I am a new user of shorewall, and am having some difficulty getting it set up on a new Fedora Core 3 system. When I run the shorewall script in the /etc/init.d the following errror message is received. tarting shorewall: ./shorewall: line 26: 10555 Terminated $exec start >/dev/null 2>&1 [FAILED]

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Alpha/shorewall-2.0.0 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Alpha/shorewall-2.0.0 -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net

Hi, I'm using samba for years now. Today I got complaints from some users they could not login any more. The PC's they used where old Win98 PC's. Unfortunately I still have to support these. It worked fine for years, though. AFAIK nothing changed the last months. And since I do such changes I would know. I have a virtual machine with XP. To do some tests, I made a snapshot just

Dear Samba users, Samba tries to close old connections on a new session setup from the same machine, but fails. Those connections result in locked files which the users can't access - i.e. save or open. I have to kill them via "kill -9 pid". smb.conf: http://pastebin.com/bYRFJwu0 smb.inc: http://pastebin.com/JV9KyDyA Using "reset on zero vc = yes" seems to reduce the

Hi, I run two live c-class subnets on the internet. Last Sunday morning I was hit with a DDoS attack and it hasn''t stopped. I made modifications on my shorewall firewall during Sunday to lesson the impact, as they were hammering me with 180k/5sec traffic both ways (inbound and outbound). One of the primary things which helped reduce their DDoS was enabling "norfc1918" on the

Rails model association collections allow you to do nifty things like: article.comments.find(:all, :conditions => {:created_at > 1.day.ago}) Has anyone found a good way to mock this up? I''m currently doing this: @comment1 = mock_model(Comment) comments = mock(Array) comments.stub!(:find).and_return([@comment1]) @article = mock_model(Article)

On 2013-06-26, at 9:38 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 6/25/13 3:13 AM, Folkert van Heusden wrote: >> >> I have a system with an ext4 filesystem with its journal on an other >> device (an SSD). >> Now this SSD dropped of the sata bus so the filesystem went r/o. >> I would like to remove the journal but it says it can't because >> needs_check is set. >

Hi, I'm running samba on a fully updated CentOS-6.3 box as a fileserver exporting to Win7 clients. samba-3.5.10-125.el6.x86_64 Anybody got an idea what is causing the following error message. It's filling up my logs. [2012/09/19 11:40:20.710031, 1] smbd/server.c:267(remove_child_pid) Scheduled cleanup of brl and lock database after unclean shutdown [2012/09/19 11:40:40.729746,

Thanks Volker, I've Changed the values as you suggested, i noticed that the default value for max xmit is much less 16384! Still I feel like the performance is very slow indeed. This because on server, a can make copys arround 8gb/s! and in samba is all so slow and it freezes as i sad many times... Can you have a second look to the log, to see if you see anything strange? I'm putting