similar to: Special config needed to add other internalprivate class C nets?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Special config needed to add other internalprivate class C nets?"

2003 Jan 17
1
Special config needed to add other internal private class C nets?
Hi everyone, I have shorewall up and running fine, and have for well over a year now. Internally, we have a LAB and they need multiple separate private class C networks to do testing, etc. I built a router, so all of the private LANs can communicate - This seems to work fine. I''m confused about what do I need to modify on my FW to get everyone to communicate out, masq''ed to the
2003 Jan 21
2
net view work alike
Hi all, Is there a command that emulates net view? I want to dump a list of all NetBIOS hosts actively on the LAN. Thanks, -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com office:610.233.ISIS (4747) direct:610.233.4870 cell:267.879.8321
2003 Jan 21
1
Thanks for help with hosts file
All (Tom especially), Thanks for correcting my hosts file faux pas. I think I now (kinda) know how this file is used. Can I use this to control what subnets can get NAT''ed out and back through the net zone? For instance, with nothing in it every network inside can get out without a problem. If I do specify networks in it, is it true that only those specified can get out and back?
2003 Mar 31
2
What's the best method - probably simple
Hi all, I'm testing out a pdf printer script I'm writing on a live samba system. I modify the script, but my changes do not seem to show up when I print. It seems like samba is caching the script. I do not want to restart samba (I'm guessing that will disconnect people), but I want to force samba to re-read the new script. I'm guessing I can HUP whatever smb process is open for
2003 Apr 07
3
security = domain and NetBIOS aliases
Hi everyone, I rely on about 8 NetBIOS aliases on my samba filer. I have been using security = server, but I have been running to some strange issues where if a user just logs off and then back on, they are denied access to shares. If they reboot, they can then get back in ok. I've set debugging up, and it appears that samba does not recognize the user after a logoff/logon, and uses nobody as
2003 Jan 30
2
Can't see all of the directories in a share with 2.2.7a-1 &RH8...but older version/kernel can
could spaces in the names be an issue? -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com office: 610.233.4747 direct: 610.233.4870 cell: 267.879.8321 -----Original Message----- From: Joe Gerkman [mailto:joe.gerkman@gartner.com] Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 1:38 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Can't see all of the
2003 Jan 27
0
FW: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-070: Flaw in SMBSigning Could Enable Group Policy to be Modified (309376)
Thanks Jerry. My fear was the latter... -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com office: 610.233.4747 direct: 610.233.4870 cell: 267.879.8321 -----Original Message----- From: Gerald (Jerry) Carter [mailto:jerry@samba.org] Sent: Monday, January 27, 2003 2:31 PM To: Barry, Christopher Cc: Samba (E-mail) Subject: Re: [Samba] FW: Microsoft
2003 Apr 01
2
nmbd question
Hi everyone, I know that there are issues with NetBIOS across subnets, but I was wondering: Q: If I run nmbd on a multi-interface Linux router, and allow it to listen on all interfaces, and pointing all clients to their respective router interface, can it effectively serve WINS to all subnets such that everyone can browse everyone? Thanks, -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems
2003 Oct 21
1
Samba-3.0 and the --with-msdfs compile flag
Hi all, First, I'm no longer on the list, so please CC me if you reply to the group. I've hunted around, but I cannot find anything about this. The --with-msdfs compile flag is not present in ./configure --help. Is dfs built now by default? OR - is it no longer supported? Thanks, -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com
2003 Mar 25
1
Got it working.....after a fashion
Strange. Any explanation as to how that did it? -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com -----Original Message----- From: Srinivas Murty [mailto:srinivas.murty@verizon.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2003 6:06 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Got it working.....after a fashion I found that even without touching anything on my
2003 Feb 04
11
About Shorewall 1.3.14
It is my plan that the upcoming release of Shorewall (1.3.14) will definitely be the last of the 1.3.x releases and will very probably be the last release of Shorewall 1.x.x. I will continue to support Shorewall 1.3 but will be making no more enhancements to it. I will be devoting my time to Shorewall 2. If anyone is interested in taking over the development of Shorewall 1, please let me
2003 Jan 15
3
libpopt.so.0 Issue
Evening; Just installed Samba on my solaris 9 server at home and am having difficulties. When I try to check out the option file using testparm, it always brings back the message : ld.so.1: ./testparm: fatal: libpopt.so.0: open failed: I can't find the library libpopt.so.0 anywhere on the system. Apparently , I forgot to load something. Can anyone help me in finding where I can
2003 May 06
0
for what it's worth, I think I have inadvertently solved an old problem...
All, For the longest time I was having this strange folder recursion problem. It persisted through many samba upgrades. The problem can be seen here in this thread: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=lang_en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&safe=off&frame=right&th=48f08dabcabb2877&seekm=9oglr1%241d66%241%40FreeBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw#link1 I think my configuration was wrong, and
2003 Jun 23
0
(no subject)
All, I'm getting the following message in my Win2K server logs. 192.168.0.8 is a samba server. Linux kernel: 2.4.17 Samba V2.2.8a security = domain Event Type: Error Event Source: Srv Event Category: None Event ID: 2006 Date: 6/23/2003 Time: 1:03:52 PM User: N/A Computer: LEXICA Description: The server received an incorrectly formatted request from \\192.168.0.8. Data: 0000: 00 00 34 00
2003 Mar 22
1
Redhat 8 printcap
Baxter, I could be wrong, but I thought /etc/printcap was the config for bsd style printing - not cups. Anyone? -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com -----Original Message----- From: Baxter Shepperson [mailto:baxshep@cox.net] Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:24 PM To: samba@samba.org Subject: [Samba] Redhat 8 printcap I am trying to
2018 Mar 21
4
CodeView layering
I'm looking at fixing some layering violations in LLVM & came across a few in the CodeView handling, specifically: lib/MC/MCCodeView includes several llvm/DebugInfo/CodeView headers I guess MC could be made dependent on DebugInfoCodeView? But probably these things should be sunk into BinaryFormat as is the case for DWARF features used by MC? include/llvm/Object/COFF.h includes
2003 Mar 25
1
Am I reading this dump correctly?
All, This debug level 5 snippet looks like it tries several authentication protocols before settling on the NT LM 0.12 version. Am I correct in my thinking? Since we run with no less than Win2K in our shop, is there a way to specify the auth to use? The reason I ask, is some of my users are having problems - not all of the time - but enough to get them annoyed. They will get locked out of a
2015 Sep 04
9
[RFC] Refinement of convergent semantics
Hi all, In light of recent discussions regarding updating passes to respect convergent semantics, and whether or not it is sufficient for barriers, I would like to propose a change in convergent semantics that should resolve a lot of the identified problems regarding loop unrolling, loop unswitching, etc. Credit to John McCall for talking this over with me and seeding the core ideas. Today,
2018 Mar 21
2
CodeView layering
Someone internally's been dabbling with turning on some of Google's build system's stricter header checking modes - and they caught these (you can check the internal code review 184305506 for the original where I'm pulling things out from). & yeah, fair question about the modules builds - I don't fully understand what they catch and don't catch. I suspect it's a
2003 Jan 22
1
FW: Microsoft Security Bulletin MS02-070: Flaw in SMB Signing Could Enable Group Policy to be Modified (309376)
All, Could this patch in any way cause problems with samba? Thanks, -- Christopher Barry Manager of Information Systems InfiniCon Systems http://www.infiniconsys.com office:610.233.ISIS (4747) direct:610.233.4870 cell:267.879.8321 -----Original Message----- From: Microsoft [mailto:0_43315_DF3995CE-B70B-4C45-84DF-1BC91F60239E_US@Newsletters.Micr osoft.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003