similar to: AW: Multiple IPSEC Tunnels

Hello Daniel, > If I can get this to work the next step would be to create a tunnel > between the linux box and the FW-1 server. (freeswan / ipsec) I think this would be easier than to tunnel ipsec through from a windows client behind your firewall. Add these config options to your ipsec.conf if you want to connect vom linux to checkpoint: keyingtries=0 pfs=no Currently I

Hi, Problem: I want 2 vpn tunnels for 2 subnets over one interface ipsec0. Documentation only describes config for 1 vpn or road warriors. I defined 2 vpn zones ''fre'' and ''swe''. #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet zone loc Local Local fre VPN_Fre VPN Fre swe VPN_Swe VPN Swe Interface ipsec0 is tunnel over eth1. Local is eth0. ipsec0 serves 2 zones: fre

Hi, I use shorewall on 2 computers and I''m really happy with it. But now I came over a special case where my wisdom ends. I have 2 VPNs running via FreeS/WAN on the firewall host, and now I want to replace my hand made setup with shorewall. I use the same FreeS/WAN setup as it is working already. I read through the documentation but there are only examples of 1 static net2net VPN and 3

I am have a shorewall firewall and freeswan ipsec running on a redhat 8.0 Linux gateway machine. I have one working tunnel defined, all works well. I am not clear how to define mutiple concurrent tunnels. I can not add further interface entries as all the tunnels come in on ipsec0, do I still have mutiple zone definitions? some of the tunnels will be dynamic roadwarriors and as such would need a

Hello, My name is Fermín Galán and I''m currently working with IPSec tunnels. Recently, I was setting a IPSec tunnelling sample scenario (maybe the simplest one :), where I observed some strange behaviour that I like to describe in the list, just in the case somebody knows what can be the cause, please. The scenario involves four hosts configured in the following way:

Hi All: Ok, here is my network: 192.168.1.0/28 is the network behind the Cisco, the Gig0/1 interface is 192.168.1.1. Linux box is 192.168.1.96/28 behind with 192.168.1.97 the Eth1 interface. I have the Ipsec tunnel up and working between them using preshared keys. So that works. Here is the Cisco tunnel setup: interface Tunnel6 ip address 192.168.2.110 255.255.255.240 tunnel source

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello, been awhile since I''ve written. I now have a situation where I get to use traffic shaping for a client. ~ We implemented the WonderShaper script on our own firewall and experienced no problems. I made some modifications to it to add IPSec protocol packets into the 1:10 high priority class using the u32 filter. ~ So far on our

Sorry to barge in on an old thread. I''m having the same trouble as the gent who started this thread. I''ve tried the options described and can''t seem to get the tunnel to pass packets through it. I''m using the Netscreen Remote VPN client (Safenet derivative) on a windows machine, trying to connect to a Netscreen 5xp at the other end. The connection fires

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

I am attempting to setup a simple network-to-network IPSec tunnel. The tunnel appears to be setup correctly because I can make connections between the networks and tcpdump shows esp packets going between the two gateways. My problem is that I cannot make connections from one gateway to the other through the tunnel. I think that this is a routing issue. Here is some more info about my network:

Hi, When a IPSec tunnel is established between two peers, I understand that the "normal" situation is to have in a given moment two SAs, one for each direction of the tunnel. However, in one of my tunnels (peer P1 running GNU/Linux with setkey and racoon; peer P2 is a Cisco router) there is a large number (around 19) of SAs established (this has been observed in P1 with

Hi, I''m trying to set-up an ipsec tunnel between a Redhat9 box and a Netgear FVS318. When trying to initialise the connection - ifup ipsec0 - I get the error: RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable This would lead me to believe shorewall is blocking ipsec. My config is below. The output of ''shorewall status'' is attached. Any help in pointing out if I''ve

Hi all. The IPSec part of the LARTC howto is great, but I''ve hit a problem in 7.3. IPSEC tunnels. The example given is for manual keying: add 10.0.0.216 10.0.0.11 esp 34501 -m tunnel -E 3des-cbc "123456789012123456789012"; How does one setup "tunnel mode" using racoon? Trying to setup an ipsec tunnel between two subnets: 10.10.42.0/24 and 10.1.1.0/24 using a

Hi all Hi everyone Shorewall 3.2.6 and OpenSWAN 2.4.4-18.2 are on SLES10 machine with public fixed IP address on Internet interface. I am trying to establish IPSEC VPN tunnel to network behind D-Link DI-804HV VPN router who is on dynamic IP address. For this I am using dyndns.org alias on DI804 side. Shorewall is stopping all packets comming from DI804 whey trying to establish tunnel. Log on

Hi dag! Thx for your reply! So, there will be no release in the near future of centos 5 for Z? At the moment we got a realy small z/linux installation, but i love it. Keeping the TCO as low as we can was necessary to satisfy the decision-maker. So we decided to choos a free linux distribution, centos was a good decicion we thougt. (redhat / fedora was always my favorite flavor *g*) It would

Hi everyone, First of all, this is my first post in this ML, so I''m not sure that this is the right place for my question (please don''t shoot me down ;)). For the record, I''ve been reading and using LARTC for almost 3 years now, and it''s a great help for anyone who wants to learn linux networking. My problem: I want to setup a tunnel for the following

Hi everyone! First of all, sorry about my bad English and the e-mails extension. I need some help to implement a VPN connection using shorewall and openswan as IPSec Tunnel. My network map: CLIENT VPN APPLIANCE --> +++INTERNET+++ --> FIREWALL --> OPENSWAN SERVER (DMZ) I have two VPN connections with two different subnets to the other end. The two of then are correctly established.

class wrote on 06/10/2004 11:18:48: > Hello, I have the following situation: > > 192.168.176.0/24 ------ A ========== B ------ 192.168.177.0/24 > 192.168.176.2 pop3 ipsec > racoon > > > policy: (Machine A and B) > ------- > loc vpn ACCEPT > vpn loc ACCEPT > all

class wrote on 06/10/2004 11:18:48: > Hello, I have the following situation: > > 192.168.176.0/24 ------ A ========== B ------ 192.168.177.0/24 > 192.168.176.2 pop3 ipsec > racoon > > > policy: (Machine A and B) > ------- > loc vpn ACCEPT > vpn loc ACCEPT > all

>sample setups of freeswan working with shorewall? I just implemented this a few days ago. In my case it was the simple scenario of two private subnets (with different private network numbers!) already equipped with Shorewall firewalls on which I added Freeswan. The hardest part was being patient enough for the other end''s firewall (a 486= ) to compile the patched kernel. I basically