Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Firewalling multiple FreeSwan connections"
2003 Jan 14
1
Question on Shorewall with FreeSwan
I am new to Shorewall and FreeSwan, please excuse my ignorance I was
wondering if someone could help me.
I had help getting my FreeSwan running with the following iptables
commands:
iptables -I FORWARD -s 0/0 -d 192.168.1.0/24 -i ipsec0 -o eth1 -j
ACCEPT
iptables -I FORWARD -s 192.168.1.0/24 -d 0/0 -i eth1 -o ipsec0 -j
ACCEPT
If I manually run this FreeSwan works, however I am not sure
2002 Sep 29
7
[Fwd: Building custom _updown script for freeswan to make it talk with shorewall]
Tuomo Soini wrote:
> You don''t happen to read shorewall-devel mailinglist ?
I read it -- I just didn''t know what to make of your post and it arrived
while I was on vacation.
What exactly are you trying to accomplish that Shorewall isn''t doing for
you now?
e.g.
/etc/shorewall/zones
rw Roadwarriors Road Warriors
/etc/shorewall/interfraces
rw ipsec+
2002 Feb 28
2
Problem with FreeSwan and Shorewall on a LEAF(Oxygen) based router.
Hello,
I seem to have the Freeswan IPSEC tunnel working between my two sites,
but I am still having a problem that looks to be because of something I have
configured wrong in my shorewall setup..
I have a LEAF Oxygen < 1.9 heavily modifed firewall setup.. Using
FreeSwan 1.91, and Kernel 2.4.8. Modified to use IPTables and
standard Debian network/interfaces. I am also using Shorewall
2007 Jun 25
4
Using Julian Anastasov''s ''routes'' patches on 2.4 kernel in conjunction with IPSec
Hello,
I use Julian Anastasov ''routes'' (to be more specific: static_routes,
alt_routes and nf_reroute) patches on a 2.4.32 kernel. On the same host I run
IPSec. I have discovered after a few hours of networking problems that,
when IPSec is enabled on that patched kernel, inspecting packets with tcpdump
while arping-ing a host from a network physically connected to this
2005 May 23
2
VPN
Hi list, I am trying to create a VPN between two different locations. On
the first location we have a cisco pix 525 Natting the internal
192.168.100.x network, while on the second location we have a Centos3
box Natting via iptables the internal 192.168.10.x netowrk. My goal is
to connect this 2 over the internet via IPsec. I created the IPsec
Net2Net via the network configuration graphic
2004 Jan 07
1
Forward some traffic to VPN
Hi. I am trying to force some traffic that goes to address 203.7.93.94
through a VPN tunnel. I use freeswan 1.98b and Shorewall 1.4.6c in one
machine. The 203.7.93.94 is in the DMZ on the other end. (Both ends use
the same shorewall and freeswan).
I have successfully set up a tunnel between the two network (using a
point to point topology, not hub).
I added a static routing that redirect
2004 Oct 20
11
Shorewall, Freeswan and SuSE 9.1
I have been using shorewall and freeswan successfully for 3 or more
years now. But they have all been using the Linux 2.4 kernel. My current
configuration is (as the title suggests) using SuSE 9.1 which has a
2.6.5 kernel and freeswan 2.0.4 built-in.
After much reading and a lot of trial and error, I did get this
combination to work with Shorewall 2.0.9. It is happily talking to an
older Mandrake
2006 May 03
5
SNAT on IPSEC tunnel with kernel 2.6/KAME tools?
Hi,
Could not conceive an working set-up for an IPSEC VPN made with racoon/setkey
on which I have one address on my side acting as an SNAT router for all
traffic from my network to a network segment on the far side.
my network --- my gateway ---------------------- remote network
10.0.0.0/24 - 10.0.0.1 (10.253.0.2) -- tunnel - 192.168.0.0/22
All traffic starts on my side, so if I can
2004 Dec 04
7
vpn-zone wide open
Hello!
I am using shorewall shorewall-2.0.11-1 on fedora core2
(iptables-1.2.9-95.7). My box has 2 physical nicĀ“s plus one virt. ipsec
interface for a freeswan-vpn connection.
A few days ago, portsentry spit out a lot of connections from windows
clients (port 135, 445). Ooops.
I review my shorewall settings but could not find a mistake. So I took a
win-client and established a second
2003 Oct 26
4
linux-xp x509 ipsec connection
hi,
I can''t get a freeswan 2.02 ipsec x509 connection at work
can somebody help me?
*************************************************************************************
global situation
*************************************************************************************
the linux gateway (chivas) is a single machine 192.168.1.250 with a local net 192.168.1.0/24,
a dyn IP via a DSL
2003 May 09
3
Windows 2000 Profiles Through Freeswan VPN
Hello,
I have setup a samba server at my office as a PDC it stores the profiles
on the server fine. I can access the profiles from any computer in the
office just fine. My problem is that I work from home 4 days a week and
need to access my work profile. I currently VPN into the office network
via freeswan. I can log into the the domain from the vpn'd connection
and I can access the samba
2004 Aug 12
0
Advanced Routing and FreeSwan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I''m trying to setup a central IPSEC-Gateway with several ipsec tunnels.
Some are to be routed over one leased line, some over the other leased
line. Both leased lines have their own public ip adress.
The setup looks kinda like this:
eth1(ipsec0)--ISP0--Internet--eth1-Linux1-eth0--Subnet1
/
2002 Sep 12
2
question on IPSEC behind NAT
Helo to all,
I am attempting to establish an IPSEC tunnel to a remote freeswan G/W
with my laptop.
My laptop sits in behind shorewall at home. From the documentation, this
is what I
Modified in Shorewall:
/etc/shorewall/tunnels:
ipsec loc 24.65.x.x
/etc/shorewall/policy
vpn loc ACCEPT
loc vpn ACCEPT
My question is, have I left anything out?
2004 Jan 15
4
shorewall, freeswan and kernel crypto-api
Hello,
I''ve finally managed to setup a firewall with freeswan 2.04 using the
kernel crypto api (backported from kernel 2.6).
(Almost) everything seems to work fine if I disable shorewall, but
packets are filtered whe shorewall is active.
I''ve already read a past thread on the subject and I followed all the
hints and it actually partially works: my lan I can access the remote
2008 Jul 17
1
racoon and ipsec issues
I am attempting to create an ipsec tunnel between two CentOS 5.1
systems, network-to-network with two different 192.168.xxx.0/24
LAN segments. I have gone through the documentation on the
centos web site, and have the machines to the point where the
/var/log/messages show ``IPsec-SA established'' on both machines
after runnig ``ifup ipsec0'' (same ipsec0 on each machine).
IP
2013 Mar 04
6
Centos6 ipsec troubles
Hello,
it looks like the usual way to do ipsec on centos5 won't work anymore on
centos6
I installed ipsec-tools but an interface type IPsec is not recognized by
the kernel
ifup ipsec0
Device does not seem to be present, delaying initialization.
I am not planning to use the awful OpenSwan, I Want to sue the Kame
implementation which was working fine on CentOS5
any hints ?
thank you
2003 Jan 14
1
MULTIPLE IPSEC TUNNELS
I am have a shorewall firewall and freeswan ipsec running on a redhat 8.0
Linux gateway machine. I have one working tunnel defined, all works well. I
am not clear how to define mutiple concurrent tunnels. I can not add further
interface entries as all the tunnels come in on ipsec0, do I still have
mutiple zone definitions? some of the tunnels will be dynamic roadwarriors
and as such would need a
2004 Sep 03
3
traffic queueing and ipsec vpn
Hi all, ive been reading lartc howto, im new about traffic shaping/police.
As far as red (chapter 9 complete) i saw that first the packet passes at the
ingress qdisc, then it passes to the ip stack if the packet is directed to
the box or its forwarded (is my case), then it falls to the egress
classifier/s.
Now, i understand if i have an ipsec vpn at the outside interface, the
egress
2005 May 23
3
Betr.: VPN
IF you are not stuck to IPSec, you might want to take a look at OpenVPN (www.openvpn.org). I found OpenVPN easier to install than FreeSWAN (an IPSEC VPN) and have setup an OpenVPN solution between my German office and our mainoffice in a matter of hours.
Thom van der Boon
E-Mail: Thom.van.der.Boon at vdb.nl
=====
Thom.H. van der Boon b.v.
Havens 563
Jan Evertsenweg 2-4
NL-3115 JA Schiedam
2002 Dec 29
2
win98 browsing problem across VPN subnets
I have just setup a VPN connection three sites using IPCOP.
Everything seems to be talking ok, apart from browsing the network neighborhood. There are no NT/Win2K/XP servers running on any of the sites, all sites are just running win98 pc's using tcp/ip. I have tried configuring all PC's to be on the same workgroup and setup sharing, but still each site can only see the pc's