similar to: interesting problem

I am trying to rate limit a particular user/ip''s news traffic and have added the line ACCEPT loc:10.5.75.253 net tcp 119 - - 1/sec:2 While this has slowed down the traffic, it has not throttled it to the point I would like. Yet with a sniffer I can see around 15 packets a second going thru. My T1 is close to saturation, and I would like to

I am unable to "make" ulogd on any of my redhat 8 machines (error 1), has anybody used shorewall with any of the other logging daemon packages out there? Steve Postma System Admin Travizon

I would like to cut down on packets logged from "loc2net". I have modified my policy file so that the logging for loc2net is "err" but dns packets and smtp are still being logged. Is it possible to filter these out? On a separate note, if I define ULOG in policy, I get an error on shorewall startup "ULOG not defined" or something of that nature. Sorry about being

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have a machine that is running Shorewall 1.3.11a. Last night it quit all logging. The "messages" file just ends at 4:20 PM, no entries since. I was vim''n into that file about that time.... Any ideas how to start logging without a reboot? Thanks for your time, Steve Postma Sys Admin Travizon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version:

for all three nodes:=0A= =0A= Brick1: gluster-0-0:/mseas-data-0-0=0A= Brick2: gluster-0-1:/mseas-data-0-1=0A= Brick3: gluster-data:/data=0A= =0A= =0A= Which node are you trying to mount to /data? If it is not the=0A= gluster-data node, then it will fail if there is not a /data directory.=0A= In this case, it is a good thing, since mounting to /data on gluster-0-0=0A= or gluster-0-1 would not

for all three nodes: Brick1: gluster-0-0:/mseas-data-0-0 Brick2: gluster-0-1:/mseas-data-0-1 Brick3: gluster-data:/data Which node are you trying to mount to /data? If it is not the gluster-data node, then it will fail if there is not a /data directory. In this case, it is a good thing, since mounting to /data on gluster-0-0 or gluster-0-1 would not accomplish what you need. To clarify, there

Soumya, its [root at mseas-data2 ~]# glusterfs --version glusterfs 3.7.11 built on Apr 27 2016 14:09:20 Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git Copyright (c) 2006-2013 Red Hat, Inc. <http://www.redhat.com/> GlusterFS comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. It is licensed to you under your choice of the GNU Lesser General Public License, version 3 or any later version (LGPLv3

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pat Haley" <phaley at mit.edu> > To: "Soumya Koduri" <skoduri at redhat.com>, gluster-users at gluster.org, "Pranith Kumar Karampuri" <pkarampu at redhat.com> > Cc: "Ben Turner" <bturner at redhat.com>, "Ravishankar N" <ravishankar at redhat.com>, "Raghavendra

Hi All, Hope someone can help. Have tried diligently all the "self-help" avenues I can find, as well as asking for help on the user forums for my distro. Here's the situation. Running SAMBA server on a libranet Linux 2.8.1 box (Debian based distro). Have SAMBA 2.2.3a-12.3 for Debian installed and running. Can create shares for file systems and printers that are accessible

Shorewall 1.4.9 is now available. http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.9 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/shorewall-1.4.9 Unless something urgent comes up, this will be the last release of Shorewall 1.x. Release notes are attached. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \

Hi Soumya, We just had the opportunity to try the option of disabling the kernel-NFS and restarting glusterd to start gNFS. However the gluster demon crashes immediately on startup. What additional information besides what we provide below would help debugging this? Thanks, Pat -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: gluster-nfs crashing on start Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2017 16:05:09

In the last 15 minutes I have had a major firewall running Shorewall display some problems. This machine has been working fine for the better part of a year, no changes made in the last week. This machine has three zones. There is a DNAT running from the net zone and the loc zone to a webserver in the dmz port 80 only. The DNAT from the loc zone seems to not be working correctly. If I make a web

Hello May i please know if asterisk is now supporting sip call encryption. It has been a requirement from one of my client to ensure that all conversation is well secured from any potential sniffers or inside hackers Please help or suggest any solution that you feel may help Kind regards Sam

I am doing rsync over a private network. Encryption is not required. Currently rsync over ssh works, but requires too many CPU cycles (especially when doing a lot of transfers) on a CPU-bound system. I need to use rsh instead. The problem is, I can either set rsh to allow transfers without a password, or it won't let me transfer files at all. I need rsh to ask for a password. The network

Hello all, Yesterday I noticed that my system was "leaking" traffic towards the 10/8 network, I have shorewall installed on multiple machines ranging from single interface devices to ones with 10+ interfaces. I tested all the boxes and they are showing the same behavior. All systems are CentOS 3.4, 2.4.21-27.0.2.ELsmp. Shorewall version: 2.2.1 For the host mentioned is a single

Hi all, The problem I have been experiencing since last month is that some of my customers are getting calls with "Asterisk <Unknown>" caller id. Most of them in the middle of the night. And my asterisk server has no record of these calls. The customers were getting irritated as you can imagine. I guessed the only way to receive incoming calls by by-passing the registration server

Hi, I have shorewall version 1.4.10g on Redhat 9 Local clients are on eth1 in subnet 192.168.3.0/24. eth0 is for the outside (over xdsl with includes a ppp0 interface). Nessus (nessusd) is installed *on the firewall* and managed trough nessus (the client or frontend) running on one of the internal machines. When I was running a scan against 194.152.181.36 I observed several entries like

Right, time to (as someone said) put this thread to a proper rest. Some of you have probably read my VPN/Routing/Lost packages hassles in the last week, well, here is the rundown. Look at http://statler.mupp.net/shorewall/Layout.jpg Basically. The shorewall knows the route to the .224.0/24 net is through .221.221. The systems in .221.0/24 has the FW as their default gw. The FW could reach

Hi, I''m trying to enable ssh (when that works, want to add:pop3s,smtp,web) from the internet to the firewall but it does not work. I managed to DNAT ftp to a host in the loc network (192.168.0.50) successful but I don''t know why SSH: Does not work for me: ACCEPT net fw tcp 22 Works from the loc network: ACCEPT loc fw tcp 22 I have tried also with (no success): AllowSSH

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69 Summary: IP ID's incorrect Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.4.x Platform: i386 OS/Version: RedHat Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org