similar to: Source-depending DNAT

Hi! I use standard Bering 2.2.2. I am trying to get my FTP-server to work with another portnumber than 21 (On port 21 all works great, but I´m really interested in running two FTP-servers, so I want to figure this one out first). Read the FAQ: http://www.shorewall.net/FTP.html and now I got this setup: In Rules: DNAT net loc:192.168.3.2 tcp 99 In Shorewalls modules.conf (tried

Hi, i need to dynamically change the destination IP address of UDP packets for an ongoing UDP flow. That means when the flow starts for the first time no change is needed and after some time a change of the destination IP address must be done to redirect the packets to another machine dynamically. For new flows this could be done using e.g.: iptables -t nat -A OUTPUT/PREROUTING -p udp

I have been using the LEAF Bering firewall for a year or so. It boots with Syslinux 1.75. But Bering is too large for a 1440KB floppy, so it formats the diskette as 1680KB. Recently I found a small Compaq 2266 box to replace a larger Compaq 7170 to run the firewall. But when I try to boot the Bering diskette on the 2266 I get the following message: Loading Linux ............ Boot failed:

hello , i am is Ruby greenhorn --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

>That should work, *IF*: > >a) hda5 is a FAT12/16 filesystem; >b) hda5 is <= cyl 1024. > > -hpa I got thinking booting off a logical partition might not be allowed, so I changed the LEAF/Bering logical partition to a primary, hda4. Then I ran "syslinux d:" from a Win98SE DOS-box to (try to) initialize the partition's boot record. And added this from a

Does anyone know a PPPoE Server for Bering ? I don''t know anything about Bering (a quick search shows an Internet Firewall device and Floppy distro...) but anyways; I have had luck with RP-PPPoE (http://www.roaringpenguin.com/products/rp-pppoe/) which does include a PPPoE server. I have my pppd patched to support RADIUS so that it can talk to my FreeRadius rig in the testing lab.... IF

Hi, I''m trying let the windows clients behind my leaf ( bering rc4) talk through msn messenger. I found linux-igd.sourceforge.net that seems to be the missing piece... I used the ideas from www.wix.net.nz/LEAF/glibc.html to build a leaf cd using the redhat 7.3 glibc ( It''s alot easier to test applications because I can simply copy the binary ( and the .so) on the bering

Thank you so much but could you tell me a little bit more in detail about that you suggested? Sorry, I'm just a greenhorn. Thanks, Seung J. Lee ---- Original message ---- >Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:26:14 -0500 >From: "David A. Greene" <greened at obbligato.org> >Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] not to break 'for' statement into basic blocks >To: llvmdev at

I'm a greenhorn when it comes to clustering in RHEL/CentOS and recently setup an active/standby clustering using Apache & Heartbeat. It seems to be a good entry step into clustering however after testing it I was disappointed in that the resource manager does not start httpd on node2 if httpd on node1 is dead (only starts httpd on node2 if the heartbeat daemon on node1 is dead). Is there

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 In this release: 1) Dynamic Ipsec Zones now work. 2) Output Traffic Accounting by user/group is supported (thanks to Tuomas Jormola). 3) The following negative test options are added in /etc/shorewall/ipsec and /etc/shorewall/masq: reqid!=<number> spi!=<number> proto!=esp|ah|ipcomp mode!=tunnel|transport

---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Jim Van Eeckhoutte" <jim@vaneeckhoutte.com> Reply-To: <jim@vaneeckhoutte.com> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 15:27:14 -0700 this is shorewall status output: tcp 6 431899 ESTABLISHED src=192.168.20.5 dst=64.4.12.45 sport=2185 dport=1863 src=64.4.12.45 dst=63.25.123.58 sport=1863 dport=2185 [ASSURED] use=1

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=821 Summary: Rosa Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: andoandre at gmail.com

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=850 Summary: DNAT applied even after deleting the IP Tables DNAT Rule Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña has discovered an exploitable vulnerability in the way that Shorewall handles temporary files and directories. The vulnerability can allow a non-root user to cause arbitrary files on the system to be overwritten. LEAF Bering and Bering uClibc users are generally not at risk due to the fact that LEAF boxes do not typically allow logins by non-root users. For 2.0

Hi all, net : internet zone dmz : DMZ zone Lan : local network zone in 1.4.6c this rule : DNAT all lan:10.0.0.1 tcp http - 192.0.0.1 does generate the following iptables rules in nat table : Chain OUTPOUT DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain net_dnat DNAT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 192.0.0.1 tcp dpt:http to:10.0.0.1 Chain dmz_dnat

Hello all, I am new to R but have some experience with MATLAB and am trying to make the switch. I generally find the two languages easy to adapt but there are a few routine tasks which I would like to run smoother in R and I am having trouble finding a help resource. Could someone suggest a guide to filtering, selecting, sorting, and processing biological matrix data? Here is a rudimentary

Hi, The private adresses (192.168.254.0/255.255.255.0) of my network are sent dynamically by dhcp on my network. The dhcp server is on the firewall which address is 192.168.254.1/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I''ve got a rsync server on this network which is on a separe server. His address is 192.168.254.200/255.255.255.255 (this address is static). I want that the users

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=471 Summary: UDP stream DNAT problem Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: NAT AssignedTo: laforge@netfilter.org ReportedBy:

I have been trying to get DNAT to work and I actually have succeeded too, however, not how I thought it would work when reading through the documentation. 1. No matter what I do I cannot get DNAT to work unless I have an entry in eiter the nat or the proxyarp file. Is that really how it''s supposed to be? I can''t find anything about it in the documentation. 2. Also, in the

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1423 Bug ID: 1423 Summary: iptables-translate silently discards --ctstate DNAT Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables over nftable