similar to: New on the Web Site

Hi, I am trying to configure the SMTP service on DMZ host. Added the rule: ACCEPT wan dmz:66.58.99.84 tcp pop3 - ACCEPT wan dmz:66.58.99.84 tcp 25 - ACCEPT dmz:66.58.99.84 wan tcp 25 - ACCEPT dmz:66.58.99.84 wan tcp pop3 - issued shorewall clear, shorewall restart, but still couldn''t telnet to the mail server

Can someone help me with this problem: My host on the DMZ is inaccessible from the WAN on port 25. I tried to telnet but getting: $ telnet 66.58.99.84 25 Trying 66.58.99.84... telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: No route to host My shorewall/proxyarp is: #address interface external haveroute 66.58.99.82 eth1 eth0 No 66.58.99.84 eth1

Hi everyone, I have a question regarding the default gateway for hosts on DMZ zone. I moved servers from parallel to the DMZ (outside the firewall, directly connected to I-net) to inside DMZ. The default gw for these servers was the DSL router(bridge) of my ISP. What should be the default gw (for the hosts inside the DMZ), when hosts are inside the DMZ now - still the DSL router (external

That log message looks like someone (or some program) is trying to browse to moreover.com from your web server machine--it''s not a reply to an external request. You''d see messages like that if you were running some sort of HTTP proxy server (like Squid) on that box (although they''d likely be to multiple IPs, unless your users only browsed to p.moreover.com). It could

Group, I am reading about tc (traffic control) and willing to get my feet wet. As requirement, there should be HTB compiled in the kernel. I grabbed a Mandrake 8.2 distro, and didn''t installed the kernel source. Anyone knows if the HTB is compiled in Mandrake 8.2, or point a way to find that out? I tried to read the /usr/src/kernel.xxxxx/.config file, but it doesn''t exists.

Two quick questions to the group: Anyone seen this before: Jan 14 02:55:45 gw1 kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN=eth1 OUT=eth0 SRC=66.58.99.83 DST=170.224.8.51 LEN=52 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=38676 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=1735 DPT=80 WINDOW=5840 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0 I mean my web server is trying to replay to some external host 170.224.8.51 (p.moreover.com) for some reason. What could be? It

Anyone, willing to take a lead on this one, since Tom is taking a rest: " I am hosting all servers by myself. I have five static IP addreses with a DSL line. My DSL router from the ISP provider is configured as bridge, so no traffic is filtered. I checked the logs and getting: Jan 5 23:05:12 gw1 kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=66.58.99.86 DST=216.35.73.164 LEN=68

I am quite new to Linux and have moved (almost) from a windoze NT4 environment. My present configuration is running SuSE V 8.0 with KDE3.0.5 desktop on two machines, connecting with Samba to an NT4 PC, and an occasional laptop or other PC that connects locally to the network. After a deal of searching, researching, and seeking advice I have decided to use Shorewall as my firewall.

To rephrase the question, "Can I use masquerading and proxy ARP in the same zone simultaneously?" It''s not a stupid question--I couldn''t see any reason why it wouldn''t work, but I had actually try it out to convince myself that it did (which isn''t a bad thing to do before posting the question to the list, by the way). In any case, the answer is

When installing Mandrake 9.0 with the higher security option you cannot ping any of it interfaces, localhost (127.0.0.1) included. All other connections to the system are fine, e.g. ssh, www, squid, etc. "shorewall clear" doesn''t help. Does anyone know how to turn this off for at least localhost and eth1?? Yours truly, Ben

I''m getting 2 or three of these a day...Any ideas ? The 192.168.250.zz is a eth0:3 on a box that currently only has eth0:1 active Dec 1 15:47:40 machine-name kernel: Shorewall:all2all:REJECT:IN= OUT=eth0 SRC=my.real.ip.addr DST=66.228.216.22 LEN=68 TOS=0x00 PREC=0xC0 TTL=255 ID=12031 PROTO=ICMP TYPE=3 CODE=1 [SRC=66.228.216.22 DST=192.168.250.zz LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=46

Hi, I''m a long time shorewall user and I like it very much. There is only one thing were I''m not always happy with: the config files. There has been discussion on the list about the comments in the files. My concern is that I loose overview over my configuration because of the many config files. Of course there are advantages too but I thinking wether another config format would

Hello, I''ve been doing some tests on a firewall system running Shorewall 1.4, and have been getting some unexpected behavior when enabling the "newnotsyn" option. In the test setup, I have: ---------------------------------------- /etc/shorewall/interfaces net eth0 detect routefilter,tcpflags,blacklist loc eth1 10.0.0.255 dhcp,tcpflags,newnotsyn

This is a minor release of Shorewall. WARNING: This release introduces incompatibilities with prior releases. See http://www.shorewall.net/upgrade_issues.htm. Changes are: a) There is now a new NONE policy specifiable in /etc/shorewall/policy. This policy will cause Shorewall to assume that there will never be any traffic between the source and destination zones. b) Shorewall no longer

[This email is either empty or too large to be displayed at this time]

Hello, I wonder if someone could use the TPROXY with Shorewall and transparent Squid  with using the routing rules on shorewall (tcrules) for hosts / networks (LAN) with multiples providers (WANs) directly from the internal network on port 80 (with TPROXY transparent squid or REDIRECT). On this issue, the routing rules is not work propertly because the source is the

Hello! We''re using Shorewall 1.4.2 and running into an interesting problem when we try to enable logging of traffic that netfilter classifies as "related" to an existing connection: there doesn''t seem to be a way to do it. Places where we''ve run into this problem are: (1) Attempting to log individual active or passive FTP data connections separately from

Hello, First , thanks to Tom for it''s great job ! Netfilter is really easy and powerfull with shorewall. So, I have configured two firewalls whith shorewall using keepalived for the redundant VRRP stuff. FW-a is MASTER and FW-b is BACKUP. Everything works correctly and FW-b upgrade to MASTER when FW-a is down or disconnected. FW-b downgrade to BACKUP when FW-a comes back. But when I

I made the following adjustments to /etc/shorewall/common.def (1.3.13 with all relevant patches). ############################################################################ # Shorewall 1.3 -- /etc/shorewall/common.def # # This file defines the rules that are applied before a policy of # DROP or REJECT is applied. In addition to the rules defined in this file, # the firewall will also define a

Hi! how can I mark ack packets with shorewall 2.x? (In 1.x I have done it with own rule in common file) TiA CU