similar to: Shorewall and NIS, Why Reject...

Hi all, I have shorewall up and running on my system. (GNU-Linux Mandrake 9) When I tested my firewall at grc.com, Shields-Up informs me that ports 113 and 135 are closed and not ''stealthed'' When reading the faq on the Shorewall site I saw that shorewall rejects rather than denys connection requests on ''TCP ports 113, 135, 137 and 139 as well as UDP ports

I''ve installed this fine software on my home network and am very pleased with the ease of installation and especially the documentation. My firewall box masq''s a private net via dialup modem. Configuration is almost exactly as described in the two-interface example. My question regards the result of a "internet test scan" that I found via google search...when I run

Guys, After i got the port forwarding and everything else working as per my previous post, i ran a shields-up scan from grc.com on the firewall, i.e. a scan of the external interface. I m a little suprised at the results. On the firewall i have postfix running ( smtp port 26 ), openssh ( ssh port 22) and port forwarding of port 85 (on the firewall ) to an internal host. The Shields-Up scan

I have the firewall turned on my CentOS 5 box, but GRC is reporting that 631 is closed instead of stealthed. If the firewall isn't configured to allow that, then why might that be happening? Miark

On Tuesday 23 December 2008 15:38:17 Warren Young wrote: > Michael Simpson wrote: > >> GRC reports that ports are stealthed > > > > Try www.auditmypc.com or nmap-online.com rather than grc to look for open > > ports > > What advantages do they have, in your opinion? > > >> there a better way than opening port 143? > > > > ssh tunnelling?

My LAN is behind a Netgear router, which does NAT. On the CentOS server I have fail2ban running. This morning my router reported 3 different IPs attempting to send UDP packets to port 38950, Since each address is only seen 4-5 times, I presume that fail2ban took over after that. GRC reports that ports are stealthed (port 143 was open, but is now closed), but then: Unsolicited Packets:

Dear All: I have several boxes that up and running just great, then we changed internet equipment due to a lightning strike, now all my inbound IAX connections (iax2 show peers) have unknown status. If I log into the remote boxes, it says "Request sent." The authentications haven't changed at all, and all the iax.conf settings are correct. It looks like a firewall issue, but

Using Shorewall v1.2, and testing the firewall using scan.sygate.com, I am informed that several ports (web (80), ident (113) and DCE locator (135) are ''closed'' rather than ''blocked''. All other ports show as blocked or ''stealthed''. I haven''t set up any rules or policies that have anything to do with 80, 113 or 135. Is this

Hi all, I have just started using shorewall. So far so good. I have two questions which I cant find an answer to either on the website or googling. They may be stupid so please forgive my ignorance. 1) What is shorewalls preferred operating status, running or stopped? What I mean is, some firewalls start-up and run, and they do their thing, then they stop. But the firewall is still really

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/Beta Problems Corrected since version 1.4.8: 1) There has been a low continuing level of confusion over the terms "Source NAT" (SNAT) and "Static NAT". To avoid future confusion, all instances of "Static NAT" have been replaced with "One-to-one NAT" in the documentation and

> On May 8, 2018, at 10:08 AM, Evans, Richard K. (GRC-H000) <richard.k.evans at nasa.gov> wrote: > > Hi David, .. I think I've got it :-) > Please let me know if you see anything glaringly wrong with this: > > library(RCurl) > zWebObj <- postForm("https://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/w/api.php", > "action" = "ask", >

On http://grc.com/default.htm I've found some bad news on the above service. It's true that if your windows network expose shared resources AND it is connect to Internet it can be bombed by hacker's attacks ? If yes, how to prevent it thru Linux-Samba ?

[non-tabular json data] -- ok.. so I think I need to figure out how to make it tabular. Thanks! [curl] -- I was hoping there was a cleaner way to do it.. using R to evoke cURL to get the data as text and then passing it into getJSON seems to be what I need to do. Do you by chance have an simple example of using RCurl to get a response ignoring cert errors? ty -Rich -----Original Message-----

Could someone tell me how to access the log likelihood of a poisson model? I've done the following.... <BEGIN R STUFF> freq.mod <- glm(formula = nfix ~ gls.gls + pol.gls + pol.rel + rac.gls + rac.pol + rac.rac + rac.rel + white + gls.gls.w + pol.gls.w + pol.rel.w + rac.gls.w + rac.pol.w + rac.rac.w + rac.rac.w + rac.rel.w, family = poisson, data = Complex2.freq, offset = lnoffset)

if I wanted to use a name for a column with two words say Dick Cheney and George Bush can I put these in quotes "Dick Cheney" and "George Bush" to get them to read into R using both read.table and read.zoo to recognize this. thanks Stephen -- Let's not spend our time and resources thinking about things that are so little or so large that all they really do for us is puff

Hi, I''m new to shorewall and iptables. I installed shorewalls ver. 2.2 two days ago and it''s working now, but I have some questions concerning pppoe. I have my ISP''s connection to internet trough PPPoE over an ethernet card. On the ethernet card I have a static IP and I have access to all other ISP''s clients wich are in the same subnet (it''s a small

❦ 4 avril 2018 17:00 +0200, Vincent Bernat <bernat@luffy.cx> : >>> You can do that locally, but as a patch it's very unlikely to be >>> accepted upstream because we've introduced RW locks to be able to access >>> domain list from multiple threads. >> >> Looking a bit more, the whole "iterating" bit is currently >> unsafe.

Regarding the question: From the linux shell I use the "-k" switch with cURL to ignore cert errors.. is there an equivalent in the R world? I have (sometimes) had success by creating a .curlrc file and putting the necessary curl options in it. When R invokes curl, curl picks up the options. [my context was running install.packages( method='curl' ) pointing to a local

On 04/04/2018 08:38 PM, Vincent Bernat wrote: > 0001-util-don-t-check-for-parallel-iteration-in-hash-rela.patch > > > From 7bf32825325b124edce58687a8cd2ceff13328b9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Vincent Bernat <vincent@bernat.im> > Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2018 16:25:37 +0200 > Subject: [PATCH] util: don't check for parallel iteration in hash-related > functions Can

I am using debian sarge. I want to block all incoming requests except DNS (port 53) and allow all outgoing traffic. I did a apt-get shorewall. When I start shorewall, I cannot even ping to any external site. I am a newbie and difficult to follow the online guide. Can anyone please help me. Thanks !