similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.15.2, 4.14.10, 4.13.14 Security Releases are available for Download

In the meantime I also did a lot of testing to find out where exactly the issue starts. This is what I found: 4.13.13 still works. I can joing a DC running this version without problem. 4.13.14 show exactly the same error as I also see on 4.21. So what exactly was changed between these two versions? According to release notes there have just been a few security fixes. I don't see how any of

On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 12:56:08 +0000 Peter Mittermayer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to upgrade my very old samba domain controllers (4.11) to > latest samba. (4.21). The process I'm following is to demote on of > the existing DCs and repalce it with a news system (up-to-date OS & > samba version). Unfortunately when

Hi Douglas, Thanks for this suggestion. I'll try that. Additionally, after reading the not on samba.tranquil.it about 'dependencies to sssd' (whatever it means) I will try to use a completely fresh installation of RHEL9. For my testlab I have just used a clone of some VM which was previously joined to domain and was using sssd. I will report back with my findings in a while. Thanks

On 12/12/24 06:25, Peter Mittermayer via samba wrote: > In the meantime I also did a lot of testing to find out where exactly the issue starts. This is what I found: > 4.13.13 still works. I can joing a DC running this version without problem. > 4.13.14 show exactly the same error as I also see on 4.21. Good work tracking that down. Do 4.14.9 or 4.15.1 work? If it is something in the

So, without doing a fresh install on the system the join succeeded with 4.14.9. What does it mean? In the end I want to end up with a much later version which is still getting security fixes. I went through the readme of CVE-2020-25717 as mentioned but did not really understand how this impacts the join procedure. Up to now I was using DOMAIN\administrator or its kerberos ticket for the join.

On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 13:11:55 +0000 Peter Mittermayer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > So, without doing a fresh install on the system the join succeeded > with 4.14.9. What does it mean? > In the end I want to end up with a much later version which is still > getting security fixes. > > I went through the readme of CVE-2020-25717 as mentioned but did not

On 13/12/24 02:11, Peter Mittermayer via samba wrote: > So, without doing a fresh install on the system the join succeeded with 4.14.9. > What does it mean? It means the change that broke the security patches themselves, not in some change that 4.13 needed to make it ready for the security patches. So, > This leads to the conclusion that there is something in my current domain

Hi; I'm new to Dovecot and Postfix. I'm trying to enable these with MySQL support and postfixadmin. I've got all those services up and running (finally!); however, I can't figure out if the emails are being received and/or stored. I'm pretty sure Postfix is receiving them because I dealt with certain errors and they're now gone. Here's some data: Dovecot ver. 0.91

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-06:23.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Multiple problems in crypto(3) Category: contrib Module: openssl Announced:

On 14-05-2023 21:21, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > > > On 14/05/2023 17:29, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> Hi! >> >> We faced another issue with not having samba (ad-dc) users in local >> /etc/password: >> this way, we can't easily have services run as users this way, since >> winbindd is >> started later than most services are (and

On Wed, 09 Oct 2024 17:36:34 +0000 bd730c5053df9efb via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi all! > > I was following a recent thread here and read Rowland Penny's answer > (https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2024-October/249858.html) > stating > > [...]I have stopped using 'username map' & 'min domain uid' because, > has you have

Hi Douglas, Doing an online backup is running the same checks as during join? I noted the same behavior. I already went up to debug level 9 without seeing any additional information. But will try 10 too. This is only about sam.ldb or any of the other DB files as well? Thanks ________________________________ From: Douglas Bagnall <douglas.bagnall at catalyst.net.nz> Sent: Thursday, December

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.13.14: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ!

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.13.14: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ!

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:08.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Buffer overflow in OpenSSL SSL_get_shared_ciphers() Category: contrib Module: openssl

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 ============================================================================= FreeBSD-SA-07:08.openssl Security Advisory The FreeBSD Project Topic: Buffer overflow in OpenSSL SSL_get_shared_ciphers() Category: contrib Module: openssl

Dear list, I'm having trouble to see how my elements on a 4 dimensional array are listed. For example, I generated the following array: junk.melt=melt(occ.data,id.var=c("Especie", "Site", "Rep", "Año"), measure.var="Pres") y=cast(junk.melt, Site ~ Rep ~ Especie ~ Año) Now, I want to be able to look at how my species (Especie) are listed, in

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.14 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.14.10: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ!

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.14 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.14.10: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ!

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.15 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.15.2: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ! ?????????????????