similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.14.11 Available for Download

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.15 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.15.2: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ! ?????????????????

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.15 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.15.2: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ! ?????????????????

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.13.14: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ!

Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.13 release series. Important Notes =============== There have been a few regressions in the security release 4.13.14: o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2020-25717.html ????????????????? PLEASE [RE-]READ!

Hello, This is situation: * [netApps SMB-server] [RHEL-7.1-Client]* | =SMB 2/3= | | sending data>65k Fail | sending data<65k Passes Max Write/Read Size[65535]

Release Announcements --------------------- These are security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2016-2124: SMB1 client connections can be downgraded to plaintext authentication. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2124.html o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members.

Release Announcements --------------------- These are security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2016-2124: SMB1 client connections can be downgraded to plaintext authentication. https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2016-2124.html o CVE-2020-25717: A user on the domain can become root on domain members.

I noticed there was Bug 12808 against 4.6.3 ( if I read it right ) about smblcient doesn't handle STATUS_NOT_SUPPORTED gracefully for FSCTL_VALIDATE_NEGOTIATE_INFO. We are currently updating to 4.6.6 and I do not see it in smbXcli_base.c. I see the fix was done in 5/30/2017. Is this something that is still needed, and will be added in future releases ? I would like to know whether I should

====================================================== "Change your thoughts and you change your world." Norman Vincent Peale ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. Changes since 4.5.10: --------------------- o Jeremy Allison <jra at

====================================================== "Change your thoughts and you change your world." Norman Vincent Peale ====================================================== Release Announcements --------------------- This is the latest stable release of the Samba 4.5 release series. Changes since 4.5.10: --------------------- o Jeremy Allison <jra at

Server: Debian Wheezy 7.3, ECC RAM, updated via cron-apt Version: 4.1.4 Clients: Windows 8.1 Pro Environment: Active Directory, installed from scratch (no migration), roaming profiles, group policies for printers, network mappings, ... Hello everyone, I've upgraded my Samba installation from 4.0.14 (which was working more or less fine) to 4.1.4 yesterday - via Sernet packages, i. e. just

Just now I again had occasion to want nested describe lists in a documentation file. I found that the bug which I reported on 18 October, 2001 still persists. I checked on the bug report at the R web page, and found that the notes say ``Not a problem in R 1.4.0 (2001-12-08)''. Well, it's still a problem for me --- using R 1.4.1. (Details: platform sparc-sun-solaris2.7 arch

Hello everybody, i'm from Mexico, at the time i?m working on a production server with asterisk 1.2.25 + spandsp-0.0.4 + libmfcr2-0.0.3+libsupertone-0.0.2+libunicall-0.0.3 and zaptel-1.2.22. I installed this version of astunicall that i downloaded from http://www.moythreads.com/astunicall/ Everything works fine, i'm able to make outgoing calls and recive incoming calls with all ANI and

Hello, I was reading about secure Dialect negotiation to prevent man-in-middle to downgrade dialects & capabilities. _https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/openspecification/2012/06/28/smb3-secure-dialect-negotiation/_ I wanted to ask, is there any option to disable SMB2 to do dialect renegotiation as present in Windows8 clients, as they can control using RequireSecureNegotiate. -- Thanks Amit

Release Announcements --------------------- These are security releases in order to address the following defects: o CVE-2019-14902: Replication of ACLs set to inherit down a subtree on AD Directory not automatic. o CVE-2019-14907: Crash after failed character conversion at log level 3 or above. o CVE-2019-19344: Use after free

Hai, ? After upgrading van 4.1.3 to 4.1.4 im getting replication errors. Before the upgrade i had 0 errors..? :-(? ? anyone any sugestions? ? ? samba-tool drs showrepl.? multiple messege?like below.? ? ??????????????? DSA object GUID: a1561f3a-cf45-4aa6-85d7-0e1a1b05e0a4 ??????????????? Last attempt @ Fri Jan 17 08:27:12 2014 CET failed, result 2 (WERR_BADFILE) ??????????????? 248 consecutive

Hi, I understand that bug 12497 was originally made private before the fixes were released, since a CVE was involved. >From the summary details below, I think that some of my DCs might be suffering from this bug and I would like to find out more info on it - however, even after logging into bugzilla I still can't view the details. I'm not sure what samba policy is in cases such as

Hello Rowland, I have already checked and the DN's are in AD, see attached. SOA: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN SOA psad102zadprh.<domain>.corp. . 9766 3600 600 86400 3600 See below NS, but the 1st NS (zatprdc001) doesn't exsit, and I cannot find it anywhere. NS: <domain>.corp. 3600 IN NS zatprdc001.<domain>.corp. <domain>.corp. 3600

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1616 Summary: root owned empty subdirs are deletable by chroot users Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 5.2p1 Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: sftp-server AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org

Greetings! Short version: -------------- I cannot rename or delete the directories that have been used in the past (i.e. files or subdirectories created within). Everything else is fine, renamable, deletable. All files (regardless wethder created before or after), all directories created after the first one. I was not able to find any hint on that - neither Google, nor UseNet archive(via