similar to: [Announce] Samba 4.15.0rc2 Available for Download

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Release Announcements ===================== This is the third release candidate of Samba 4.15.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.15. This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only. Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.15 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Removed SMB (development) dialects

Hello, I've recently set up Samba (4.12.3) on Arch Linux as the target for Time Machine backups for a couple of Macs. Shortly thereafter I started seeing OOMs whenever a backup would start. I stumbled upon disabling encryption on the server (i.e. changing "smb encrypt" from "required" to "off") to prevent this issue. After further digging, I'm able to

Hi, we have a situation where access to a share on some Netapp box fails with “client max protocol” set to SMB3_11 (or unset): protocol negotiation failed: NT_STATUS_INVALID_NETWORK_RESPONSE With a protocol max set to SMB3_10 or SMB3_02 the login prompt is reached and subsequent file access is succeeds: negotiated dialect[SMB3_00] against server[192.168.42.42] got

Hai Philipp, DOM.AIN\foobar's password: ^^^^^^^^ No dot is allowed in the NTDOM Fix that first, then try again. Greetz, Loius > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Philipp Gesang via samba > Verzonden: woensdag 13 februari 2019 16:14 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] smbclient error

Mason, You can set these also on the share. Win7 and10 client min protocol = SMB2 client max protocol = SMB3 The one for the scanner, client min protocol = NT1 client max protocol = SMB2 Part of my smbstatus -a: PID Username Group Machine Protocol Version Encryption Signing 27316 root root

I don't have any lines in my configuration file for any of the servers, how can I tell what the default protocols are? Are the defaults controlled by samba or the kernel? Chris On 6/15/2020 2:13 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 11:23:54AM -0500, Christopher Wensink wrote: >> I have a handful of Linux Servers, running Centos 6.10, and 6.8 with the >> main host

Dear all, Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet support > except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for now disabling > SMB2/3 on the Windows 10 client is your best, if not ideal, option. > > Instructions for doing.this can be found > here: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/2696547

Dear Rowland, Thanks a lot for your anwswer ! Le 2017-10-17 20:16, Rowland Penny via samba a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 > "Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >> Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : >> > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet >> > support except in the

On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:42 AM qw <applemax82 at 163.com> wrote: > windows 7 supports smb3. If centos's samba server suport smb3, how to make > windows 10 support smb3 too? > > > with min_protocol=SMB3, windows 7 will use SMB3_00, while windows 10 will use SMB3_11 and everyone should be happy. -- -john r pierce recycling used bits in santa cruz

On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 19:31:17 +0200 "\(lists\) Denis BUCHER via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Dear all, > > Le 07.09.2015 à 15:52, soonerdave a écrit : > > Windows 10 will try to negotiate SMB3_11, which Samba4 doesn't yet > > support except in the current 4.3 release candidate. I suspect for > > now disabling SMB2/3 on the Windows 10

On 03/10/2019 20:30, Christopher Cox via samba wrote: > On 9/27/19 1:39 PM, Jeremy Allison wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 01:36:42PM -0500, Christopher Cox via samba >> wrote: >>> On 9/27/19 1:32 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> ....snippity... >>>> I repeat, smbclient never had anything to do with network browsing, so >>>> it is

Hi, I can access centos's samba via windows 7, but fail via windows 10. Why? Thanks! Regards Andrew

Hi list, Ive generated a samba 4.9 AD, which is running properly. Now I want to understand how to use the "samba-tool computer" command for offline joining windows clients. First I created a machine name (this is identical to <ComputerName> in unattend.xml?): root at ad49:~# samba-tool computer create cnpc11 Computer 'cnpc11' created successfully root at ad49:~#

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Rich Otero via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > server max protocol = SMB2_22 > max protocol = SMB2_22 > protocol = SMB2_22 The 3 lines above all mean the same thing, the last 2 are synonyms of the first. Taking a peek at "man smb.conf" is a good place to start. > idmap uid = 16777216-33554431

Hello everyone, For the context, I'm trying to add support for offline join in WAPT WADS OS deployment [1]. Currently WADS supports offline join of Windows computers, and I want to add support for Linux computer using SSSD as a authentication client (for the persons who might dismiss this mail because of a certain keywords, yes it is related to sssd, but it triggers a Samba bug). I also

Hello. I am observing some strange behavior on a Linux system that has joined a Windows Active Directory domain using the Samba suite. Our servers are based on Ubuntu v12.04 but have kernel v3.12.17 and Samba v4.3.6. The problem that I'm trying to understand is that group name resolution through Winbind occasionally fails. Here's an example where one group name could not be resolved. This

Hello I don't know if this is normal behavior (does the djoin have the spn?): When a have kerberos method in smb.conf : kerberos method = secrets and keytab Joining with offlinejoin does not work: root at testjoinlinux:/# net offlinejoin requestodj loadfile=/root/djoin =============================================================== INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11: Erreur de segmentation in net