similar to: GFS performance under heavy traffic

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "GFS performance under heavy traffic"

2019 Dec 28
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
Hi David, It seems that I have misread your quorum options, so just ignore that from my previous e-mail. Best Regards, Strahil NikolovOn Dec 27, 2019 15:38, Strahil <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> wrote: > > Hi David, > > Gluster supports live rolling upgrade, so there is no need to redeploy at all - but the migration notes should be checked as some features must be disabled first.
2019 Dec 24
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
Hi David, On Dec 24, 2019 02:47, David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > > Hello, > > In testing we found that actually the GFS client having access to all 3 nodes made no difference to performance. Perhaps that's because the 3rd node that wasn't accessible from the client before was the arbiter node? It makes sense, as no data is being generated towards
2019 Dec 20
1
GFS performance under heavy traffic
Hi David, Also consider using the mount option to specify backup server via 'backupvolfile-server=server2:server3' (you can define more but I don't thing replica volumes greater that 3 are usefull (maybe in some special cases). In such way, when the primary is lost, your client can reach a backup one without disruption. P.S.: Client may 'hang' - if the primary server got
2020 Oct 30
0
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Hi Dovid, We can change the SDP in Kamailio, but Asterisk will still send its RTP from its default address. The remote end is strict about accepting RTP from the specified source and won't accept it. Have you any suggestions to solve that problem? Thank you. On Fri, 30 Oct 2020 at 14:49, Dovid Bender <dovid at telecurve.com> wrote: > Why not use OpenSips/Kamailoo in between?
2020 Oct 30
0
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Hello, Does anyone know a way with chan_sip to tell Asterisk to use a specific IP address for its end of the communication for a specific device? Something like: [device] type = friend host = 11.22.11.22 ouraddress = 33.44.33.44 This is for use on a server with multiple IP addresses. There is the "extenip" setting, but it's really designed for NAT, and can only appear in the
2023 Feb 24
1
Big problems after update to 9.6
Hi David, It seems like a network issue to me, As it's unable to connect the other node and getting timeout. Few things you can check- * Check the /etc/hosts file on both the servers and make sure it has the correct IP of the other node. * Are you binding gluster on any specific IP, which is changed after your update. * Check if you can access port 24007 from the other host. If
2020 Oct 30
3
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Why not use OpenSips/Kamailoo in between? Where you want 1.1.1.1 you pass it along as is. Where you want 2.2.2.2 change the sdp in opensips/kamailio On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 20:44 David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Does anyone know a way with chan_sip to tell Asterisk to use a specific IP > address for its end of the communication for a specific
2023 Apr 18
1
RTP address learning and timing problem
I don't know in that specific output what happened. Your best course of action is to add further logging or step through the logic with all of the knowledge you have of the RTP streams to understand what is happening. On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 8:52 PM David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Thank you for that. From the code it kind of looks like
2017 Sep 29
2
nfs-ganesha locking problems
Hi, I have a problem with nfs-ganesha serving gluster volumes I can read and write files but then one of the DBAs tried to dump an Oracle DB onto the NFS share and got the following errors: Export: Release 11.2.0.4.0 - Production on Wed Sep 27 23:27:48 2017 Copyright (c) 1982, 2011, Oracle and/or its affiliates.??All rights reserved. Connected to: Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition
2020 Oct 23
0
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:13 PM David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > Hi George, > > Thank you for the response. I'm a little unclear on what you mean by a > transport. We're using chan_sip, not pjsip. > > Do you mean a device in sip.conf, using bindaddr to set the address to > bind for that device? We've only used bindaddr in the
2023 Apr 17
1
RTP address learning and timing problem
Hi Joshua, Thank you for that. From the code it kind of looks like STRICT_RTP_LEARN_TIMEOUT is a minimum, not a maximum: if (!ast_sockaddr_isnull(&rtp->strict_rtp_address) && STRICT_RTP_LEARN_TIMEOUT < ast_tvdiff_ms(ast_tvnow(), rtp->rtp_source_learn.start)) { ast_verb(4, "%p -- Strict RTP learning complete - Locking on source address %s\n", Our call shows: #
2020 Oct 23
2
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
OK, thank you George. On Sat, 24 Oct 2020 at 03:16, George Joseph <gjoseph at digium.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:13 PM David Cunningham < > dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > >> Hi George, >> >> Thank you for the response. I'm a little unclear on what you mean by a >> transport. We're using chan_sip, not pjsip.
2023 Apr 17
1
RTP address learning and timing problem
It's probably best if you read the logic[1]. There's an entire comment that talks about how it works. [1] https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/blob/20/res/res_rtp_asterisk.c#L8158 On Mon, Apr 17, 2023 at 7:10 PM David Cunningham <dcunningham at voisonics.com> wrote: > Hi Joshua, > > Could you confirm if the 5 second period for learning a new audio stream > is a minimum
2024 Nov 29
1
Disk size and virtual size drive me crazy!
No! I didn't! I wasn't aware of this option. I will try. Thanks Em sex., 29 de nov. de 2024 ?s 16:43, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> escreveu: > Have you figured it out ? > > Have you tried setting storage.reserve to 0 ? > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 0:39, Gilberto Ferreira > <gilberto.nunes32 at
2024 Nov 29
1
Disk size and virtual size drive me crazy!
Have you figured it out ? Have you tried setting storage.reserve to 0 ? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 0:39, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: 11.1 --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira +55 (47) 99676-7530 Proxmox VE VinChin Backup & Restore Em qua., 20 de nov. de 2024, 19:28, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> escreveu:
2024 Dec 02
1
Disk size and virtual size drive me crazy!
qemu-img info 100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2 image: 100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2 file format: qcow2 virtual size: 120 GiB (128849018880 bytes) disk size: 916 GiB cluster_size: 65536 Format specific information: compat: 1.1 compression type: zlib lazy refcounts: false refcount bits: 16 corrupt: false extended l2: false Child node '/file': filename: 100/vm-100-disk-0.qcow2
2023 Apr 17
1
RTP address learning and timing problem
Hi Joshua, Could you confirm if the 5 second period for learning a new audio stream is a minimum or a maximum? The unusual call flow in question results in Asterisk learning a new audio stream when we don't want it to, and having a minimum of say 2 seconds of audio would help avoid this. Thank you! On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 12:32, Joshua C. Colp <jcolp at sangoma.com> wrote: > On
2024 Oct 21
1
How much disk can fail after a catastrophic failure occur?
Ok! I got it about how many disks I can lose and so on. But regard the arbiter isse, I always set this parameters in the gluster volume, in order to avoid split-brain and I might add that work pretty well to me. I already have a Proxmox VE cluster with 2 nodes and about 50 vms, running different Linux distro - and Windows as well - with Cpanel and other stuff, in production. Anyway here the
2024 Nov 20
1
Disk size and virtual size drive me crazy!
11.1 --- Gilberto Nunes Ferreira +55 (47) 99676-7530 Proxmox VE VinChin Backup & Restore Em qua., 20 de nov. de 2024, 19:28, Strahil Nikolov <hunter86_bg at yahoo.com> escreveu: > What's your gluster version ? > > Best Regards, > Strahil Nikolov > > ? ??????????, 11 ??????? 2024 ?. ? 20:57:50 ?. ???????+2, Gilberto > Ferreira <gilberto.nunes32 at
2020 Oct 22
2
Multiple IP addresses and using same IP for outbound calls as inbound
Hi George, Thank you for the response. I'm a little unclear on what you mean by a transport. We're using chan_sip, not pjsip. Do you mean a device in sip.conf, using bindaddr to set the address to bind for that device? We've only used bindaddr in the [general] section before, but if it will work in a device that could be the answer. On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 00:13, George Joseph