similar to: router in a subnet again :)

HI, I''ve got a proxy arp setup with iptables and tc. on eth0 i have a route to 172.16.2.0/24 network on eth1 is the LAN of 172.16.1.0/24 network I have enabled proxy arp on both interfaces. Now accordingly, the interface will respond to all ARP requests for which it has a route to. Noy my setup is such, that a user on the LAN, would like to have an ip from the 172.16.2.0/24 network.

Hi, I''m with a problem here on configuring our server to use multiple uplinks with different providers. The packet goes though on my way, but there is some lost packets that I don''t known where it''s going and causing my link to goes slow and stop sending/receiving data. Here i''m listing the route tables and the rules. It''s only for 1 IP.

Hi, I''m setting up a router (linux, debian-sarge), which shall relay dhcp requests from all subnets to a central DHCP server. The general stuff is solved, i.e. I can ping from any connected machine to any other including the NICs of the router itself. All firewall tables (including nat and mangle) are set to ACCEPT and flushed. On my model system I have the NIC 172.16.1.121 (eth1),

Problem: I have four networks, A, B, C, and D Networks B, C, and D should not be able to see each other. Network A should be able to see all of them. A - 172.16.1.1/24 B - 172.16.2.1/24 C - 172.16.3.1/24 D - 172.16.0.1/24 For host machine X, which is at 172.16.1.100/24 (network A), I added a route for it to ping a machine (Y) on the network B:     ip route add 172.16.2.0/24 via

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

I hope this isn't too long, and I hope it's the correct list. I have a network configuration where I have 2 hosts, A and B. Each has a local LAN on which the run Samba, plus they're connected by a VPN. So has A has addresses lanA and wanA, and host B has addresses lanB and wanB. Because of the way the VPN works, they can talk to each other either via their LAN addresses (lanA

Hi, I use shorewall on 2 computers and I''m really happy with it. But now I came over a special case where my wisdom ends. I have 2 VPNs running via FreeS/WAN on the firewall host, and now I want to replace my hand made setup with shorewall. I use the same FreeS/WAN setup as it is working already. I read through the documentation but there are only examples of 1 static net2net VPN and 3

Hello, On a Asterisk 11.12.0, I'm studying BLF behaviour with Yealink phones. My ultimate goal is to present Operator the name and number of every incoming call so that he/she can if it's worth to pickup a ringing incoming call. I've discovered notifycid option in sip.conf. When a call comes in, I can see that Asterisk is sending two successive NOTIFY messages while the target is

Hi, Problem: I want 2 vpn tunnels for 2 subnets over one interface ipsec0. Documentation only describes config for 1 vpn or road warriors. I defined 2 vpn zones ''fre'' and ''swe''. #ZONE DISPLAY COMMENTS net Net Internet zone loc Local Local fre VPN_Fre VPN Fre swe VPN_Swe VPN Swe Interface ipsec0 is tunnel over eth1. Local is eth0. ipsec0 serves 2 zones: fre

Hello, I've got an analog phone which is currently receiving unsollicited FAX calls from PSTN. For learning purpose, I'm preparing an Asterisk/SPA3102 setup that would let voice calls come in and out and translate incoming FAX calls to TIF files (forwarded through email)). My target setup is : PSTN <-- analog--> SPA3102 Line Port <-- SIP --> Asterisk <-- SIP -->

Hi, Problem is: I have a Dell 1950 server with 6 NIC's ( 1 for Voice / Asterisk rest of them for other functions). The Voice LAN is on the 172.16.3.0 (255.255.0.0) subnet. One the other NICS there are different but also Class B like 172.15.1.x and so on. No problem at all i think. Now asterisk is up and running, I connected a Thomson 2030 directly to the NIC with an cross cable (to avoid

pc1(LANa) ----poor connection ----> VPS <--------- PC2(LANb) pc1 and pc2 used to connected directly with tinc, since pc1 used to have WAN IP(pppoe), but the pppoe IP is not WAN IP anymore (ISP changed to let all ADSL user in a LAN). if I let the two pc connect to a VPS with tinc, can later connections between pc1 and pc2 be directly ? for example, ssh from pc1 to pc2 but not proxyed by

I just got the list confirmation and noticed it''s text only email so here it is again in plain text. Below is the oringal message. Hi all, I am really struggling with this one, I have built a lot of linux machines using IPSEC tunnels and shorewall gateways. I decied to build a new test machine with Debian running 2.4.25 and Shorewall 2.0.15. I have two subnets on their own switches and

I've looked through all the doc and searched the list archives, but I just can't seem to get it to work. I have a Linux box with 5 ethernet interfaces, 3 of which have winboxes I'd like to include in my little Samba network. I'm able to get it far enough for each winbox to see the linbox, but they can't see each other. Here's my setup: Winboxes Linbox Win2k -

Hi, I am running OpenVPN where i have one central hub VPN server, and multiple spoke VPN clients. I can ping from each client to the server and each client to computers on the subnet which the server resides (192.168.2.0/24) so it works ok there. I cannot however, ping from one client to another client. I guess the packet path would go: clienta -> vpn -> shorewall/router -> vpn ->

Hi list, I am trying to create a VPN between two different locations. On the first location we have a cisco pix 525 Natting the internal 192.168.100.x network, while on the second location we have a Centos3 box Natting via iptables the internal 192.168.10.x netowrk. My goal is to connect this 2 over the internet via IPsec. I created the IPsec Net2Net via the network configuration graphic

Hello, I could successfully played with General Purpose Parameters (GPP_A, GPP_B) and a TFTP server : whenever I change a GPP value in a configuration file, my SPA3102 automatically updates the corresponding value its web server shows. My config file is : <flat-profile> <GPP_A>myid </GPP_A> <UID1>myid </UID1> </flat-profile> I though I could use this

Hi folks, Has anyone out there done port forwarding or DNAT for UDP packets that are normally sent to the broadcast address (255.255.255.255)? I have to support a nasty database application called FileMaker Pro (those of you who know it are probably groaning about now), which uses broadcasts to locate the database server. Theoretically, i can get around this requirement by using LDAP lookups

Hi, I tried sending this earlier, but it didn't come through. Apologies if this appers twice on the list. I'm running bridging using the brouter setup described on this page: http://ebtables.sourceforge.net/examples.html "Making a brouter". The setup described there is like this: ifconfig br0 0.0.0.0 ifconfig eth0 172.16.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 ifconfig eth1 172.16.2.1

2009/12/15 Olivier <oza-4h07 at myamail.com> > > > 2009/12/15 Steve Howes <steve-lists at geekinter.net> > > >> On 15 Dec 2009, at 10:42, Olivier wrote: >> > Unfortunately, it seems macro expansion doesn't occur in Line1 tab : >> > when I type $A or $(A) or ${A} or $GPP_A or $UID1 in User ID field >> > (in Line1 tab), asterisk