similar to: Re: Stop Using relays.osirusoft.com *NOW*! (fwd)

Hi All, So I tried to upgrade to 2.5.2p2 today. Got this when I stopped/started sshd: Disabling protocol version 2. Could not load host key Re-installed 2.3.0p1 and all was well again. This look familiar to anybody? Thanks, Jim -- Jim Seymour | PGP Public Key available at: jseymour at jimsun.LinxNet.com | http://www.uk.pgp.net/pgpnet/pks-commands.html

Samba organizers might want to look into this: [ns1:~] dig 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> 150.73.70.66.relays.osirusoft.com ;; global options: printcmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28005 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 13 ;; QUESTION SECTION:

Jim, It wasn't an implication that Samba4 would crash your server, rather it was a question of what happens *if* that box fails (power supply, memory, cpu, disk controller, etc. I've seen 'em all)? Consider this. I had one site with a Microsoft DC providing DHCP to it's clients and shared folders. When that DC failed due to disk controller, it stopped issuing DHCP leases.

On Jun 10, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Jim Seymour <jseymour at LinxNet.com> wrote: > But the manual > also says "The Axxium Pro system communicates with your computer using > an advanced binary protocol." I can see that phrase being used to describe BCM/XCP.

SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (5 hits, 5 required) SPAM: Hit! (2.0 points) Received via a relay in

SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ---------------------- SPAM: This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future. SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. SPAM: SPAM: Content analysis details: (14.1 hits, 5 required) SPAM: INCREASE_SOMETHING (0.4 points) BODY: Instructions

Hi There, We have this rather large-ish floor-standing Best Axxium Pro, Model Series 0650. I tried using both the "bestups" and "blazer_ser" drivers with it, but no go. So before I go any further: *Should* one of these work with it and, if not, do I have any options? (E.g.: Modify a current driver, resuscitate one that was started and abandoned, etc.? I can code.) My test

NOTE: Please honour the "Reply-To" and do not "Reply-All". I'm reading the mailing list. I wouldn't be posting to it if I was not and I don't need two copies. Thanks! On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:32:33 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > [snip] > > Oops. I missed that you had missed this! When you said flat zone > file, I took

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:09:10 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: > On 26/07/16 15:31, Jim Seymour wrote: > > Hi There, > > > > Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. > > Thanks! > > Why didn't Samba AD work, what problems did you have, it might be > easier to fix them. It's a long and ugly story, which

Hi There, Tried a Samba AD. Didn't work out. Please do not suggest. Thanks! Here's what we have: Ubuntu Linux 14.04.4 LTS Samba 4.3.9-Ubuntu Using OpenLDAP for authentication Using nscd to speed things up *Not* running winbind *Not* running Kerberos The problem is the company purchased a product that, *despite* the vendor being told "We don't have

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:40:47 +0100 Rowland penny <rpenny at samba.org> wrote: [snip] > > I remember it now, it started last September ( see here: > https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2015-September/194047.html) and > it could have been the longest running thread on here and you still > couldn't get it to work. More accurately: Couldn't get it to work the way

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:19:22 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 09/08/2015 09:04 AM, Jim Seymour wrote: > [snip] > > > > And the zone file on deepthought might read something like... > > > > somepc IN A 192.168.0.10 [snip] > > Problem with the AD DC is that it lives in a sub-domain, > >

Hi All, Finally got BIND_DLZ going. Last errors were: samba_dlz: Failed to configure zone 'example.com' loading configuration: already exists exiting (due to fatal error) samba_dlz: shutting down And, indeed, I had, in /etc/bind/named.local.conf: zone "example.com" in { type master; file "named.hosts"; }; Commenting that out

Sent this before, but it apparently got lost in the ether... On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:32:23 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard > RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial converter? Real, honest-to-goodness RS-232 port. [snip] > Maybe Kjell has some insight on what else to try with the bcmxcp

On Tue, 11 Jun 2013 09:32:23 -0400 Charles Lepple <clepple at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > You mentioned the null-modem cable, but are you using a motherboard > RS-232 port, or a USB-to-serial converter? Real, honest-to-goodness RS-232 port. [snip] > Maybe Kjell has some insight on what else to try with the bcmxcp > driver. > If I could just see what, if anything, the

On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:00:28 -0400 Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > Ah, LDAP is included within Samba, I find. Don't install provided > one... [remainder snipped] Yikes! I thought it awfully suspicious that Samba required so few additional packages and so little "glue work" to get an AD PDC going. Now I know why. We *require*, not desire, but

On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 17:27:03 -0400 Sonic <sonicsmith at gmail.com> wrote: [snip] > > I've never experienced a problem sending to the list. Also any > properly working mail server should have worked as well. If one MX > server doesn't answer it should try the next one... as long as one is > up the mail should go through. Yeah, I know how it's supposed to work, I

Hi All, Through interpreting what the current Wiki article says, plus some trial and error: The following AppArmor rules *appear* to work for a Samba AD DC using the stuff from the distro for Ubuntu 14.04 LTS: $ cat /etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.named # Site-specific additions and overrides for usr.sbin.named. # For more details, please see /etc/apparmor.d/local/README. /dev/urandom w,

Hai Jim, what is your looking for. Im using a SSO for my Zarafa mail server. Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Seymour >Verzonden: maandag 31 augustus 2015 21:21 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] Samba AD PDC , LDAP and Single-Sign-On >(was: re: Samba Internal DNS vs. BIND_DLZ)

Ok try set the profiles folder on 777 And add : valid users = %u @"Domain Administrators" greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Jim Seymour > Verzonden: dinsdag 26 juli 2016 16:32 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] NT4-Style Auth & Roaming Profiles Only? > > Hi