similar to: redirecting mail

Hello, Just installed shorewall 1.4.6a on Redhat 9. Using two-interface and NAT. Getting this error on starting shorewall Processing /etc/shorewall/ecn... Activating Rules... Adding IP Addresses... /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 317: [: 213.94.193.89: integer expression expected/usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 317: 32 - 213.94.193.89 : syntax error in expression (error token is

Shorewall version 2.2.1 2 Interface setup. eth1: 10.10.1.3 eth0: 192.168.1.2 modem is 192.168.1.1 I need to be able to connect to my adsl modem, but when shorewall is up I get connection rejected. I have added "192.168.1.1 RETURN" above the line "192.168.0.0/16 logdrop # RFC 1918" in "/etc/shorewall/rfc1918" but still getting connection rejected Is there

I've been having problems since updating to samba 3.0.10 on Debian 3.1 Below is the output of ltrace and gdb on the offending smbd process. I tried upgrading to 3.0.11 and the problem still exists. Anyone have any suggestions? [ltrace output] After about 20 seconds on the processes ltrace loops this iconv(0x82cecc8, 0xbffff218, 0xbffff21c, 0xbffff220, 0xbffff224) = -1 __errno_location()

Hi, I'm using Asterisk with two Cisco 7960 phones using SIP. I'm seeing the following weird behavior: SIP Phome 1 is extension 4002 SIP Phone 2 is extension 4003 I call 4002 from 4003 and that works fine. I call 4003 from 4002, and it rings locally to 4002, never gets to 4003. I'm able to send a config query packet to 4003 from the asterisk console and get a response, when I send

Hello, I'm using two Cisco 7960 phones currently loaded and showing Firmware POS3-07-4-0 (Version 7.4?) and I'm having a strange problem. Whenever the phone is supposed to try to load anything over HTTP from my Apache 2.2.x web server, the connection just sits and times out. Nothing shows up in the Apache logs unless I hit cancel. What could the trouble be? -- Mark P. Hennessy

I'm trying to compile Linuxthreads from ports on my FreeBSD 4.8 system here, and for some reason I keep getting this: You can use an experimental patch to reduce the number of condition variable triggered context switches by defining WITH_CONDWAIT_PATCH Some unsafe calls to exit() can be detected by defining LINUXTHREADS_DETECT_UNSAFE_EXIT, see files/README.FreeBSD for more info. ===>

On Tuesday 05 August 2008 03:27, Bill Wendling wrote: > On Aug 4, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Shrutarshi Basu wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm a rising sophomore CS/Engineering student in the US and I'm > > interested in programming languages/ compilers.I think the LLVM would Yay! We need more compiler people in this industry. :) This is actually a very good time to be getting

In a fit of irony, while preparing to burn a CDROM with some software I've been writing for about six months, I did a rm *>o instead of rm *.o on an ext3 filesystem. And I'm well aware that under normal circumstance you can't undelete, especially a ext3 filesystem. However, I need to at least *try* to recover this. I've built lde (linux disk editor) and if I can isolate a

Hi, Our backend for Pixel Visual Core uses some MVT's that aren't upstream. Does it make sense to upstream them? I figure that as architectures get wider, we'll eventually have "all" possible combinations of widths and types, but on the other hand having code that isn't used by current backends in tree isn't great. These are the MVT's that we have added: 16x16

Hi Sean, I had to add ‘v16f16’ to our out-of-tree target, and this was to primarily to allow me to express lowering for all the OpenCL types (well, except for the ‘v3T’ types). The trend does seem to be towards larger bit-width SIMD registers, and as you say this will increase in time; but perhaps instead of using a discrete enumeration combined with additional entries in several

I''m beginning to think again about what will be different in 2.0. Here are some thoughts. a) User-defined actions will be emphasized. - A library of actions will be available with names such as: AcceptSSH AcceptDNS DropWindows (drops all SMB noise) DropBroadcasts (Silently drop all Broadcast traffic) ... The possibilities are nearly endless but should

On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:13 PM, Martin J. O'Riordan <MartinO at theheart.ie> wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > > I had to add ‘v16f16’ to our out-of-tree target, and this was to > primarily to allow me to express lowering for all the OpenCL types (well, > except for the ‘v3T’ types). > > > > The trend does seem to be towards larger bit-width SIMD registers, and

I have this same problem on 3.0.10, and I also "fixed" it by deleting the tdbs. My problem, had nothing to do with printing, it was happening once I started winbindd with security = ADS. Jerry, what would we need to do to track this bug down in the tdb code? I have logs at level 10, ltrace output, and a backtrace. Do you think that there were changes made to the tdb code in 3.0.12

Hi, I am running 1.4.8 and i have an external IP that is pretty well cut up with DNAT to several different subnets. When adding DNS (UDP:53) to the mix, I dont get a response from the server. According to shorewall (shorewall show nat): 33 2527 DNAT udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 69.13.51.22 udp dpt:53 to:10.2.80.40 yet my DNS log is coming up empty its only seeing

Hello, I'm setting up a new Dovecot sever to replace an old Cyrus server, and need to keep things as consistent as possible. I have a couple local accounts, like junkmail and notjunkmail that users get shared access to, and can drop things in to train sa-update. However, when users share over junkmail's inbox, it's displayed in the hierarchy: ? Other Users ? junkmail ? INBOX

On Aug 4, 2008, at 10:29 PM, Shrutarshi Basu wrote: > Hello all, > I'm a rising sophomore CS/Engineering student in the US and I'm > interested in programming languages/ compilers.I think the LLVM would > be a great project for me to contribute to, both to learn something > and help the project. Unfortunately, I don't know much about > compilers, much less anything

I'm using Centos 4.5 right now, and I had a RAID 5 array stop because two drives became unavailable. After adjusting the cables on several occasions and shutting down and restarting, I was able to see the drives again. This is when I snatched defeat from the jaws of victory. Please, someone with vast knowledge of how RAID 5 with mdadm works, tell me if I have any chance at all

OK, I am attempting to use the userdb connection to facilitate per user migration to Maildir format from mbox. Here's the first user: more /home/dovecot.passwd health:$1$MCtvt/Tz$FmKqU/cbWlBhKnhc5W.Ko.:1152:1152:/home/health:userdb_mail=maildir:~/Maildir The configuration was set up as: userdb passwd { } I changed this to: userdb passwd-file { args = /home/dovecot.conf }

Is there an automatic solution to this? Oct 27 08:00:48 192.168.50.5 dovecot: POP3(evelina2): mail_location: mbox: mkdir(/home/popuser_evelina2/mail) failed: Permission denied Oct 27 08:00:48 192.168.50.5 dovecot: Fatal: POP3(evelina2): Namespace initialization failed Oct 27 08:00:51 192.168.50.5 dovecot: POP3(evelina2): mail_location: mbox: mkdir(/home/popuser_evelina2/mail) failed: Permission

OK, I have been running the UW-POP3 server which currently translates all login ids as lowercase (i.e. Anthony becomes anthony). Now the Dovecot server is very flexible and currently I have not found how to translate the upper case characters to lowercase. What configuration setting will translate the userids to lowercase? -- Albert E. Whale, CHS CISA CISSP Sr. Security, Network, Risk