similar to: newbie

Hello, I reinstalled my Slackware 10.1 a few days ago, before i did that i stored all files in /etc/shorewall to an external HDD. After reinstallation was complete i installed shorewall and restored the config files i backed up before, but now if the FW is running i can´t ping the adsl modem and so i can´t connect to the internet using pptp. Note, it worked before with exactly the same

Hi There, We currently using iproute2 for load balancing. However we need more upload speed as we load balance over 3 dsl lines. I''ve been looking for a way to combine the upload speed to more faster. Found a site called www.upstreaminter.net where these guys bond the adsl channels to improve uploads, Since downloading is problem as its need to know the ip address of the downloader they

Hi, I am using Shorewall 2.0.6 on Debian with iptables 1.29. Before I was using Shorewall 2.0.3 and If work correctly, I am not sure that my problems begin after upgrade to 2.0.6, but my problem is that I can''t see some websites on the pc clients ( such as www.microsoft.com ), but some websites yes ( they are not in the pc cache ). My config is Shorewall as gateway/router of

Hi Tom, I nearly completed the test and installation related to http://www.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm. However, there is no serious problem when it is operated as it is in the general companies, but there is Client Program for MS-Window that is operated only by Public IP. So I am very concerned about it. I would like to use Internet through Gateway in (B) as local computers in (A) receive Public

I am having a problem with 5.4 that I did not have with 4.5. The problem happens only sometimes but in specific instances. Basically a summary of the problem is that certain network transactions timeout. The specfic instances are with wget, rpm, http. The problem usually, but not always, occurs with pptp stuff. (NOT running pptp but getting pptp stuff). For instance, the following command, which

I have a 3 nic setup with shorewall 1.4.8-1 running on redhat 9. My eth2 (dmz zone)has 7 secondary address attached to it. I can ping a machine in each subnet, dmz to net rules seem to be working fine on all machines.. I have my policy set as dmz to dmz accept. If I try to ping between subnets I get Nov 21 12:18:45 kbeewall kernel: Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT:IN=eth2 OUT=eth2 SRC=172.17.0.2

Hi, I currently connect to my ISP via my adsl modem in bridge mode and PPPoE. I am due to put a second PPPoE ISP onto my firewall box which will give me ppp0 (general) and ppp1 (static leased line). The static leased line will run a number of services on its static IP and it is therefore imperative to make sure rules defined for the static line are assigned to the correct interface. I need this to

Hi there.... Has anyone seen a tutorial around for a pptp server (on the same server as the firewall) for centos/rhel 4? I have been following a few general tutorials for POPTOP, but nothing seems to really work as of yet. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I don't want to use a VPN to solve this one. I am really wondering with (samba 3.x) when the linux box become part of The AD domain does it get a special privileges? > > Hi,i am not sure if i understand yor needs, but maybe this helps > this links guide you to setup a pptp server an client for linux > http://www.poptop.org/ > http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/ > there

Sorry to post this here, but since last week I've posted to Fedora's mailing list, pptp-devel's list, and linuxgeneral forum. No one has given much for answers, or the people that have replied have not understood what I'm looking for. Hoping someone here can. For the record, I'm doing this on FC3 not CentOS. Anyway, if anyone can provide assistance I would be very appreciative.

Ok, on to new swamps. I would like to enable PPTP on CentOS4 to accept connections from clients running MicroSoft Win2K and XP pro from outside our firewall. I am testing pptpd-1.2.3-0 and tells me that I need kernel support for MPPE, which I suppose is MicroSoft's own form of PtoP encryption. Is there a way of doing this without rebuilding the kernel? If so, how? Regards, Jim --

Under Linux, i can configure my DSL connection with pppoeconf (debian), without configure my Ethernet interface (eth0), just load kernel module fo ethernet interface, launch pppoeconf here is it. Another way is to configure the DSL interface (eth0 -> ALCATEL Speed Touch Home) with IP:10.0.0.1 so i can telnet or access with an web explorer the modem on 10.0.0.138. After i launch pppoeconf and

Hello all, I was not able to find much on this in the archives so I hope someone can help Me with this. Can samba 3.x help the authentication of a Microsoft client authenticating with MSCHAPv2 passwords to my linux box which we use to authenticate a user stored on a Microsoft Active Directory server. The authentication request comes in through RADIUS which I can convert to LDAP,but that

Trying to install the pptp client here: http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/ I get down to this step, but get errors: rpm --install php-gtk-pcntl-1.0.1-2.i386.rpm warning: php-gtk-pcntl-1.0.1-2.i386.rpm: V3 DSA signature: NOKEY, key ID b56a8bac error: Failed dependencies: libglade is needed by php-gtk-pcntl-1.0.1-2.i386 libglade.so.0 is needed by php-gtk-pcntl-1.0.1-2.i386

I'm going thru the documentation for pptpclient located on the pptpclient.sourceforge.net site and am referencing the Fedora Core 3 how-to. The docs refer to installing libglade and libxml and when I do so with a "yum install libglade libxml" no packages are found for installation. In looking at the installed packages I find libxml2. Is libxml2 adequate for libxml or would it be

how to use iproute/iptables to balance by packet OUTBOUND traffic between 2 PPP (pptp cable modem and pppoe adsl modem) links to the same ISP . also by using the fact that the ISP dosen''t filter source IP address - meaning i can use either PPP''s link assigned IP address as the source IP in the ip header.., it works for both devices.., what i want to achive is : when uploading a

Is it possible to have a route stick in the kernel, even if device it points to goes to roller coaster up and down drive. For example. I have an ADSL modem and am doing VPN over it. There's a route needed for VPN added like this: ip route add 192.168.1.0/24 via 1.2.3.4 src 192.168.2.1 There are two problems with it: a) if ADSL link is down when above command is executed, the route

I have the following forced up mew by evil telco problem: - One IP - Homebrew LAN - portforwarding for some services. - extra PPTP/ppp layer to an internal 10.* network which mutilates DNS answers. Setup: Machine A has ip a.b.c.d (real IP) and is reachable over ADSL with it from the world. It does NAT for an internal LAN 192.168.0.0/24) and has portforwading turned on for some ports (eg 80)

Greetings list, Thanks to all who replied to my thread a few days ago "SIP devices with packet loss tolerance". One of the suggestions that came out of that thread was to replace routers at users' premises with ones that support QoS. I've used m0n0wall's QoS in the past with reasonable success, but it's quite a bulky and complex setup for deploying to remote sites which

Sorry for the long descritpion of the problem, I''d like to know If I misunderstand something or if I meet an intrinsic limit of my setup. 217.58.51.162 HDSL eth1 - SRV_XP: 192.168.254.10 eth0: 192.168.254.1 -----+------------------+------- 81.121.243.250 ADSL eth3 - I want to allow incoming pptp request (port 1723) to be forwarded to srv_xp