Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "wormHunter.sh and friends"
2010 Dec 24
1
node crashing on 4 replicated-distributed cluster
Hi,
I've got troubles after few minutes of glusterfs operations.
I setup a 4-node replica 4 storage, with 2 bricks on every server:
# gluster volume create vms replica 4 transport tcp
192.168.7.1:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol1
192.168.7.4:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol2
192.168.7.3:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol2
I started copying files with
2005 Mar 18
3
Openvpn Connection Reset
Hello I''m hoping you guys can help me figure this out. When I use
shorewall clear my windows openvpn client connects perfectly every
time. But when I have the shorewall up 90% (not every time) it will
connect for about a second and then the connection will reset and that
will repeat over and over so i never don''t really get a steady
connection at all. I can tell you that
2005 Mar 13
4
Bridging Firewall with windows OpenVPN road warriors?
I have previously set up an openvpn LAN to LAN bridging VPN so I know a
little about what has to happen. The gateways on either ends were
running older version of shorewall that did not support openvpn directly
so I just basically opened ports for it and used bridging with tap
interfaces. I am no longer using that vpn link to the other house but
now that i''ve upgraded I would like
2008 Mar 25
5
Assign Physical NIC to domU
Hello everyone!
Well i want to know, if there is a way to specify a
physical nic (like eth0 or eth1) to a
domU and how can i do it.
The server has two nics, what i want to do is assign
physical nic (eth0) to the dom0 and assign physical
nic (eht1) to the domU.
I appreciate your help.
Regards
Ivan
____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a
2006 Mar 24
3
Performance slow down with increasing log files size?
Dear all,
I have been noticing this.
Whenever I delete my log files and restart lighttpd, my rail site
runs very fast.
However when my log files become large, my rail site becomes slower.
Then I repeat the process of deleting log files again, and my site is
fast again.
Is this a normal behavior? Is there something I can do to make
performance scale better?
Thank you,
Sharkie
2008 Aug 28
4
Very Slow!
System info:
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga)
Kerlen 2.6.18-8.el5 SMP x86_64
Samba version 3.0.23c-2
Eth0 && Eht1 bonded to bond0, 2Gbps.
/etc/samba/smb.conf attached below...
I?m seeing very slow transfers from Samba.... I?m not sure how else to
describe it. If I try and copy a 4GB DVD image from the server to any
Windows box (XP, 2003, 2008,
2002 Nov 03
4
Not visable server
Hi list
I have a problem.
Running Samba 2.2.1a on a Redhat Linux 7.2 kernel 2.4.18
Client is a Microsoft Windows2000pro
I can connect to all shares but I can not see my server in network
neighborhood.
I can see the the clients but not the server???
What have I missed? Some configuration I can test
Thanks
H?kan
2005 Oct 02
1
XP SP2 connecting to 3.0.10-1.4E
I have been running our companies XP Pro systems on our Samba domain
controller (version: 3.0.10-1.4E) with local administrative rights up to
this point. Everything has worked fine.
We are getting larger now and I'd like to make the logins locally
restricted (I want them to have XP's "Users" rights and "Remote Desktop
Users" only). When I restrict the accounts
2015 Feb 16
2
[Bridge] Sniffing a linux bridge vs sniffing enslaved interfaces
I can think of several potential differences. ?You may miss any bridge
specific traffic (STP, LLDP) using the interfaces generated by the bridge
itself.
If you have vlan tagged sub interfaces you might also miss that traffic if
you were snooping a particular interface. Obviously you will miss any
on-wire broadcast traffic specific to the layer1 connection a particular
interface was connected to
2006 Jul 21
4
OpenVZ and virtuel network
Hello All
I installed shorewall 3.0.8 on Centos 4.3 with openvz.org kernel
it work well
i have in this Host 3 virtual servers (VPS)
i can access from a VPS to the internet , and with NAt rule (Via
Shorewall) i can access from Internet to the 3 VPS.
i want that all the 3 VPS can communicate between them.
i can''t do a tcp connection from a VPS to an other , in my shorewall log
in the
2003 Sep 07
2
(no subject)
I have setup a bridged connection using the guide on
openvpn.sourceforge.net. The two linux gateways have established a vpn
connection over the internet but i can''t seem to get
anything through it. I''m using shorewall, but pretty much all the policies
are open right now. One thing that i see i am doing different is that i
have two different ip setups on the two networks.
2010 Feb 05
16
DNAT Problem
Hi,
I have a client behind shorewall which has 2 IP:
192.168.8.35 is the real IP and 192.168.8.37 is the virtual IP.
I have added DNAT rules into shorewall:
DNAT net loc:192.168.8.35 tcp 11008 - 1.2.3.4
DNAT net loc:192.168.8.37 tcp 55000 - 1.2.3.5
1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 is virtual IP
2006 Aug 14
1
HTB and BOND Interface
Hi!
Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface?
I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) :
BOND0 -> ETH0 + ETH1
BOND1 -> ETH2 + ETH3
( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt
)
HTB work very well with Class over BOND0.
If I add Class for BOND1 it generate balance errors.
Also with HTB.init
2002 Nov 29
1
configuring dhcp-relay / Shorewall
In our LAN a Linux-router connects 2 subnets. On this router dhcrelay is
running.
For several reasons we have to run a firewall on this box. But what is
the right way to configure dhcrelay using Shorewall???
Thanks.
--
Ad Koster <lidad@zeelandnet.nl>
2005 Jun 01
2
TC Filtering Problems
Dear Admins and Hackers,
maybe i am to stupid to use ''tc''. But i having logical Problems to understand the Filter Rules in tc.
Common Config:
There is a Linux Engine (Debian) with a 2.6.11.11 Kernel which act as Packetshaper.
Two Interfaces eth0 and eth1 are installed. Interface ''eth0'' is the Firewall Side Net
195.185.185.0/24. Interface
2003 Jan 13
5
Using private & public addresses together i n the Shorewall''s DMZ zone
To rephrase the question, "Can I use masquerading and proxy ARP in the same
zone simultaneously?" It''s not a stupid question--I couldn''t see any reason
why it wouldn''t work, but I had actually try it out to convince myself that
it did (which isn''t a bad thing to do before posting the question to the
list, by the way). In any case, the answer is
2006 Feb 24
8
Ruby site structure on Apache
I use a hosting company,it use appache for RoR
I test a ''hello word'' code here
http://www.smtservers.com/demo/
I can see the working code here
http://www.smtservers.com/demo/public/say/hello
My question is how to short the url like
http://www.smtservers.com/demo/say/hello.I do not like public always in
URL
Thanks for help
Mark
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2018 Apr 25
2
LAN hosts not reachable
Me and my son are running Tinc over 5 nodes, 3 of them got public address
and we using them as server. Each node has its own Lan subnet 192.168.0.0/24.
Originally we ran network on Openwrt routers with Tinc many years without
any problem, but due to limited RAM on routes and change of one router to
not Openwrt supported model, we decided to transfer Tinc installation on
Raspberry Pi-s in LAN.
In
2003 Sep 03
8
Asterisk Jitters
Hi,
Every time I dial into my asterisk box i hear nothing but asterisk
jittering.
The following is an example of what I get on the asterisk CLI
Thanks
*CLI> DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3826 (check_user): Setting NAT
on RTP
to 0
DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4807 (handle_request): Check for res
DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 952 (find_user): Call from user
2002 Oct 18
2
WAN setup over frame relay 7 locations
Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall
for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have
problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco
routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from
the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but
it was working for