similar to: wormHunter.sh and friends

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "wormHunter.sh and friends"

2010 Dec 24
1
node crashing on 4 replicated-distributed cluster
Hi, I've got troubles after few minutes of glusterfs operations. I setup a 4-node replica 4 storage, with 2 bricks on every server: # gluster volume create vms replica 4 transport tcp 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol1 192.168.7.1:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.2:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.3:/srv/vol2 192.168.7.4:/srv/vol2 I started copying files with
2005 Mar 18
3
Openvpn Connection Reset
Hello I''m hoping you guys can help me figure this out. When I use shorewall clear my windows openvpn client connects perfectly every time. But when I have the shorewall up 90% (not every time) it will connect for about a second and then the connection will reset and that will repeat over and over so i never don''t really get a steady connection at all. I can tell you that
2005 Mar 13
4
Bridging Firewall with windows OpenVPN road warriors?
I have previously set up an openvpn LAN to LAN bridging VPN so I know a little about what has to happen. The gateways on either ends were running older version of shorewall that did not support openvpn directly so I just basically opened ports for it and used bridging with tap interfaces. I am no longer using that vpn link to the other house but now that i''ve upgraded I would like
2008 Mar 25
5
Assign Physical NIC to domU
Hello everyone! Well i want to know, if there is a way to specify a physical nic (like eth0 or eth1) to a domU and how can i do it. The server has two nics, what i want to do is assign physical nic (eth0) to the dom0 and assign physical nic (eht1) to the domU. I appreciate your help. Regards Ivan ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a
2006 Mar 24
3
Performance slow down with increasing log files size?
Dear all, I have been noticing this. Whenever I delete my log files and restart lighttpd, my rail site runs very fast. However when my log files become large, my rail site becomes slower. Then I repeat the process of deleting log files again, and my site is fast again. Is this a normal behavior? Is there something I can do to make performance scale better? Thank you, Sharkie
2008 Aug 28
4
Very Slow!
System info: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5 (Tikanga) Kerlen 2.6.18-8.el5 SMP x86_64 Samba version 3.0.23c-2 Eth0 && Eht1 bonded to bond0, 2Gbps. /etc/samba/smb.conf attached below... I?m seeing very slow transfers from Samba.... I?m not sure how else to describe it. If I try and copy a 4GB DVD image from the server to any Windows box (XP, 2003, 2008,
2002 Nov 03
4
Not visable server
Hi list I have a problem. Running Samba 2.2.1a on a Redhat Linux 7.2 kernel 2.4.18 Client is a Microsoft Windows2000pro I can connect to all shares but I can not see my server in network neighborhood. I can see the the clients but not the server??? What have I missed? Some configuration I can test Thanks H?kan
2005 Oct 02
1
XP SP2 connecting to 3.0.10-1.4E
I have been running our companies XP Pro systems on our Samba domain controller (version: 3.0.10-1.4E) with local administrative rights up to this point. Everything has worked fine. We are getting larger now and I'd like to make the logins locally restricted (I want them to have XP's "Users" rights and "Remote Desktop Users" only). When I restrict the accounts
2015 Feb 16
2
[Bridge] Sniffing a linux bridge vs sniffing enslaved interfaces
I can think of several potential differences. ?You may miss any bridge specific traffic (STP, LLDP) using the interfaces generated by the bridge itself. If you have vlan tagged sub interfaces you might also miss that traffic if you were snooping a particular interface. Obviously you will miss any on-wire broadcast traffic specific to the layer1 connection a particular interface was connected to
2006 Jul 21
4
OpenVZ and virtuel network
Hello All I installed shorewall 3.0.8 on Centos 4.3 with openvz.org kernel it work well i have in this Host 3 virtual servers (VPS) i can access from a VPS to the internet , and with NAt rule (Via Shorewall) i can access from Internet to the 3 VPS. i want that all the 3 VPS can communicate between them. i can''t do a tcp connection from a VPS to an other , in my shorewall log in the
2003 Sep 07
2
(no subject)
I have setup a bridged connection using the guide on openvpn.sourceforge.net. The two linux gateways have established a vpn connection over the internet but i can''t seem to get anything through it. I''m using shorewall, but pretty much all the policies are open right now. One thing that i see i am doing different is that i have two different ip setups on the two networks.
2010 Feb 05
16
DNAT Problem
Hi, I have a client behind shorewall which has 2 IP: 192.168.8.35 is the real IP and 192.168.8.37 is the virtual IP. I have added DNAT rules into shorewall: DNAT net loc:192.168.8.35 tcp 11008 - 1.2.3.4 DNAT net loc:192.168.8.37 tcp 55000 - 1.2.3.5 1.2.3.4 and 1.2.3.5 is virtual IP
2006 Aug 14
1
HTB and BOND Interface
Hi! Is it HTB fully compatible with BOND interface? I have this setup (mode= fault tolerance) : BOND0 -> ETH0 + ETH1 BOND1 -> ETH2 + ETH3 ( http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/marcelo/linux-2.4/Documentation/networking/bonding.txt ) HTB work very well with Class over BOND0. If I add Class for BOND1 it generate balance errors. Also with HTB.init
2002 Nov 29
1
configuring dhcp-relay / Shorewall
In our LAN a Linux-router connects 2 subnets. On this router dhcrelay is running. For several reasons we have to run a firewall on this box. But what is the right way to configure dhcrelay using Shorewall??? Thanks. -- Ad Koster <lidad@zeelandnet.nl>
2005 Jun 01
2
TC Filtering Problems
Dear Admins and Hackers, maybe i am to stupid to use ''tc''. But i having logical Problems to understand the Filter Rules in tc. Common Config: There is a Linux Engine (Debian) with a 2.6.11.11 Kernel which act as Packetshaper. Two Interfaces eth0 and eth1 are installed. Interface ''eth0'' is the Firewall Side Net 195.185.185.0/24. Interface
2003 Jan 13
5
Using private & public addresses together i n the Shorewall''s DMZ zone
To rephrase the question, "Can I use masquerading and proxy ARP in the same zone simultaneously?" It''s not a stupid question--I couldn''t see any reason why it wouldn''t work, but I had actually try it out to convince myself that it did (which isn''t a bad thing to do before posting the question to the list, by the way). In any case, the answer is
2006 Feb 24
8
Ruby site structure on Apache
I use a hosting company,it use appache for RoR I test a ''hello word'' code here http://www.smtservers.com/demo/ I can see the working code here http://www.smtservers.com/demo/public/say/hello My question is how to short the url like http://www.smtservers.com/demo/say/hello.I do not like public always in URL Thanks for help Mark -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
2018 Apr 25
2
LAN hosts not reachable
Me and my son are running Tinc over 5 nodes, 3 of them got public address and we using them as server. Each node has its own Lan subnet 192.168.0.0/24. Originally we ran network on Openwrt routers with Tinc many years without any problem, but due to limited RAM on routes and change of one router to not Openwrt supported model, we decided to transfer Tinc installation on Raspberry Pi-s in LAN. In
2003 Sep 03
8
Asterisk Jitters
Hi, Every time I dial into my asterisk box i hear nothing but asterisk jittering. The following is an example of what I get on the asterisk CLI Thanks *CLI> DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 3826 (check_user): Setting NAT on RTP to 0 DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 4807 (handle_request): Check for res DEBUG[81926]: File chan_sip.c, Line 952 (find_user): Call from user
2002 Oct 18
2
WAN setup over frame relay 7 locations
Hi - I have shorewall-1.3.8-1 on a RH 7.3 machine that acts as a firewall for my network. It was running the other day just fine, but today I have problems getting to the firewall. It is a frame-relay network with Cisco routers. Everything is 192.168.x.x / 24. I can''t ping the firewall from the WAN, but can from the main LAN. Sounds like a routing issue to me, but it was working for