similar to: Question on sNAT for multiple external subnets

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1900 matches similar to: "Question on sNAT for multiple external subnets"

2014 May 01
1
BIND Log file entries
This morning I see this in the syslog on our primary public DNS host. internal_send: 142.77.1.1#33950: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#35153: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#35644: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#49394: Connection timed out: 1 Time(s) internal_send: 142.77.1.1#49816: Connection timed
2000 Oct 05
1
Fraunhoffer claims patents on other formats (UU2314806)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("Re: [vorbis] Fraunhoffer claims patents on other formats") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing.
2003 Apr 15
3
SNAT or DNAT or what?
Hello, I have a Debian-Woody-3.0 Router with 3 NIC''s. Kernelversion 2.4.18 +------------+ +-------------+ | | | | |192.168.1.1 | | 192.168.2.1 | | DSL-Router | | ISDN-Router | +------------+ +-------------+ | |
2005 Jan 11
2
MIT Kerberos and OpenSSH
Howdie, Is there a way to get the default BSD 5.3 openssh to compile against the MIT kerberos libraries? I have set NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf so that the heimdal kerberos is not built, and rebuilt world, then installed /usr/ports/security/krb5 and rebuilt world again. sshd is however not being built against MIT at all. [root@foobar] ~ # ldd /usr/sbin/sshd /usr/sbin/sshd:
2011 Mar 13
16
Shorewall 4.4.19 Beta 1
Beta 1 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Previously /var/log/shorewall*-init.log was created in the wrong Selinux context. The rpm''s have been modified to
2011 Mar 13
16
Shorewall 4.4.19 Beta 1
Beta 1 is now available for testing. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- I. P R O B L E M S C O R R E C T E D I N T H I S R E L E A S E ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1) Previously /var/log/shorewall*-init.log was created in the wrong Selinux context. The rpm''s have been modified to
2004 Mar 19
6
Anyone want to test NETMAP?
If you are interested in helping with testing new features, please look at http://shorewall.net/netmap.html. If you have a need for this type of network-level address mapping and/or are in a position to test it please let me know. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2011 Mar 19
6
localhost being blocked
Hi I have shorewall/iptables running on my server (pub) but access to localhost is blocked then I attemp to use ping localhost, telnet localhost 25, echo Hello | sendmail -v root@localhost. All these commands were run after using shorewall reset and creating the attached file. All these commands work with shorewall clear. My problem is I can''t email the root messages from (pub) to
2011 Mar 10
3
multi-isp and preventing certain traffic on a given connection
I have a multi-isp configuration: CGCO 1 256 main $CGCOIF detect track,balance br-lan,tun0 IGS 2 512 main $IGSIF detect track,fallback br-lan,tun0 where I force SMTP out one of the connections: 512:P br-lan - tcp 25 But the effect of that of course is that if IGS goes down, SMTP will leak out of the CGCO connection. How can I prevent that? Cheers, b.
2011 Mar 17
2
DNAT problem
Hi All, I use rather old Shorewall 3.2.6 and I know it''s no longer supported. I haven''t been updating the software because it works as intended until now. The problem is a simple DNAT rule. I actually have around 8 DNAT rules and they all work just fine. Here is what I want to achieve. I have a SMTP server in my LAN (lets say address 192.168.1.10). The SMTP daemon listens on
2011 Mar 13
4
ipod touch, skype, and a shorewall firewall
Hi, My firewall is a machine running Debian Squeeze with shorewall 4.4.11.6. /etc/shorewall/policy says this: loc $FW ACCEPT loc loc ACCEPT loc net ACCEPT $FW net ACCEPT $FW loc ACCEPT net all DROP # info all all REJECT
2004 Nov 24
6
Route first or NAT?
Hi, I''m trying to use shorewall for a RAS dialup solution We have networks we need to connect to with the same ranges internally (i.e. 2 separate users with a 192.168.0.0/24 range). We connect to these via a pptp tunnel (or isdn) The problem we have is that we need to access these networks all the time, so allocate them a range from our internal range. This will then be NATed to the
2006 Apr 13
2
NAT/STUN Server
Hi, I am trying to register SIP clients which are behind NAT on different network. In order to achieve this goal I think I need STUN Server . I downloaded STUN Server from http://internap.dl.sourceforge.net/sourceforge/stun/stund_0.96_Aug13.tgz But I don't know how to install/configure it. And please advice me that STUN server is good idea for this scenario? Thanks in advance Wazb
2000 Dec 25
0
Improve your stepfamily life (UU2402549)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("[vorbis] Improve your stepfamily life") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide
2001 Feb 16
0
Announce: VCE v0.1.2 (UU2466819)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("Re: [vorbis] Announce: VCE v0.1.2") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide you
2001 Feb 16
1
Announce: VCE v0.1.2 (UU2466818)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("Re: [vorbis] Announce: VCE v0.1.2") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide you
2001 Feb 16
0
Announce: VCE v0.1.2 (UU2466923)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("Re: [vorbis] Announce: VCE v0.1.2") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide you
2001 Feb 21
0
Announce: VCE v0.1.2 (UU2472120)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("Re: [vorbis] Announce: VCE v0.1.2") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide you
2001 Mar 01
0
VCE 0.1.3 (UU2481359)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("[vorbis] VCE 0.1.3") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help us provide you with the best
2001 Mar 06
0
Experimental info editor for winamp (UU2487620)
** THE RETURN ADDRESSES ON THIS LETTER HAVE BEEN SET TO PREVENT MAIL ** ** LOOPS IN THE EVENT YOU ARE RUNNING SOFTWARE WHICH AUTO-REPLIES TO ** ** INBOUND MAIL. UUNET WILL NOT SEE ANY REPLY SENT TO THIS LETTER. ** Dear Customer, We have received your message ("Re: [vorbis] Experimental info editor for winamp") and forwarded it to the appropriate personnel for processing. To help