similar to: unbound and ntp issuse

Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> writes: > IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP of public ntp servers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poul-Henning_Kamp#Dispute_with_D-Link DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no

Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw at zxy.spb.ru> writes: > IMHO, ntp.conf need to include some numeric IP of public ntp servers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NTP_server_misuse_and_abuse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poul-Henning_Kamp#Dispute_with_D-Link DES -- Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav - des at des.no

On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI > emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some way to > debug this? Can you panic it from console to get to db> to get

I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some way to debug this?

Hi, ??? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues this afternoon. At 16:26 (GMT) had alerts for DNS failures against our CentOS 6.10 bind DNS servers from our monitoring system. Sure enough DNS requests via the server was failing, checking the named.log showed dnssec issues; 25-Mar-2020 16:26:10.285 dnssec: info: validating @0xb48b17c0: push.services.mozilla.com

I don''t if anybody is using the concat modules from ripienaar, but since an upgrade to 2.7.5 I keep getting an error on fragment collection. The code is like below: @@concat::fragment{ "${name}" : target => "/etc/bind/named.conf.keys", content => template("dns/named.conf.keys.erb"), order => 10, tag =>

At Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:03:23 +0000 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Hi, > > ???????????? Anyone else had any issues with CentOS 6.10 bind DNS server issues Yes. The installed ISC DLV key installed with bind-9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.3.x86_64 seems to have expired and there does not appear to be a new bind-9.8.2 RPM with a new key. I guess you can

Is this mis-configuration, or just noise in my log? ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.056 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for '.': success: 1 Time(s) ??? 29-Apr-2018 00:50:26.120 general: warning: managed-keys-zone: No DNSKEY RRSIGs found for 'dlv.isc.org': success: 1 Time(s) -chuck -- ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics |

On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: > On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:21:32PM -0800, Patrick Masotta wrote: >>>>>> [ ... Failed to

Greetings - Has anyone ever managed to install 4.2 on a Sony Vaio desktop, model VGC-RB53 ? I can install either mentioned - but on bottup after the install, I get a kernel panic and it just hangs. For that matter, it does the same if I try FC4 - TIA -- Best regards, Chris Never create a problem for which you do not have the answer.

An outside caller started to leave voice mail. The CLI shows: Recording the message -- x=0, open writing: /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/sip/4232/INBOX/msg0000 format: gsm, 0x8295d40 -- x=1, open writing: /var/spool/asterisk/voicemail/sip/4232/INBOX/msg0000 format: wav, 0x829e2c0 -- User cancelled by pressing 0 -- Playing 'vm-saveoper' (language 'en') Later on,

On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 12:53 PM, John 'Warthog9' Hawley <warthog19 at eaglescrag.net> wrote: > On 01/03/2015 08:56 AM, Gene Cumm wrote: >> On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Geert Stappers <stappers at stappers.nl> wrote: >>> On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 05:07:04PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: >>>> On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:06:58AM +0200, Ady wrote:

Hi, A64 versus A32/T32 code generation is controlled by the -target option which I don’t believe is under discussion here. James On 18 May 2016, at 13:17, Bruce Hoult <bruce at hoult.org<mailto:bruce at hoult.org>> wrote: Note that armv8a modifies the A32 and T32 instruction sets, and is therefore an important -march option for 32 bit code. Therefore armv8a can not be used to imply

Hi everyone, I'm a member engineer of linaro's llvm team,coming from Spreadtrum.I am a new person on LLVM.Now I'm writing a Target Parser for AArch64,so options parsing of AArch64 about cpu & arch & fpu can be summary to one place. In the TargetParser,we assume "aarch64" and "arm64" are synonyms of armv8a(as they are only for armv8a,people usually do

Hi all, Actually,I found there is a same problem for arm.For this case,I think > maybe we can play a trick in the clang. > Checking whether the given arch valid or not,before we throw it to the > parser,which can be used for both arm > and aarch64. For the actions I mentioned above,I wrote a check function as below, basing on the naming rules of the arm architecture. +//Only if

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Francois Pichet" <pichet2000 at gmail.com> > > To: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2015 5:34:11 PM > > Subject: [LLVMdev] Question about shouldMergeGEPs in

On 5 May 2016 at 13:01, Bradley Smith <Bradley.Smith at arm.com> wrote: > Allowing -march=aarch64/arm64 is somewhat misleading I think, -march is used > for specifying an architecture version to target whereas aarch64/arm64 don’t > convey any information to that effect, does it mean armv8a, armv8.1-a, etc? Hi Bradley, That's a good point. But also, what does "armv8a"

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2119 Bug ID: 2119 Summary: SSHFP with DNSSEC ? no trust anchors given, validation always fails Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 6.2p1 Hardware: Other OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component:

Hello, I'm getting a persistent error at login (effectively locking me out) on two Win2k machines that were once assigned to a domain on my windows network (win2k server was once the PDC, just changed to Samba) Cannot log you into the primary because the system's computer account is missing or the password was incorrect. The old domain was: yrbmag.yellowrat.com and I'd like every

Hello, after I did update all my CentOS6 boxes - VMs and router; two of them (one VM and the router) are my local DNS resolvers; and I'm using the DNSSECTLSAvalidator plugin from nic.cz: https://www.dnssec-validator.cz/ before the update this plugin worked using my resolvers, after the update I get: "Failure - bogus DNSSEC reply, DNSSEC validation not possible with current