similar to: FW: logwatch

Hi All, I need to be able to make sense from my shorewall logs. I have installed logwatch and it is mailing me reports but the level of detail is just not there. I have set the detail variable to High=10 but I get entries only from the DNS service about denied updates. What am I getting wrong? Tom, will you be kind enough to send me your logwatch config files? Thanks in advance. Ama

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. ---1463811327-2097478821-1023027109=:9844 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Here''s a version of /sbin/shorewall that has the ''logwatch'' command that

FYI... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] 2.6 kernel ipsec and shorewall Date: Thursday 23 September 2004 07:44 From: "Jonathan Schneider" <jon@clearconcepts.ca> To: "''Tom Eastep''" <teastep@shorewall.net> I must have been up too late working on this, looking at it the next day I noticed I completely forgot

Hi I have 2nic firewall . I had to open some ranges of udp and tcp ports . I faced a problem that although all the ports are open Some functionality was not working . Any body used shorewall with H323 Voip traffic DNATed . Any help is appretiated . Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: <shorewall-users-request@lists.shorewall.net> To: <shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Sent:

FYI This bug will prevent ''shorewall restore'' from working if you have "!<single IP address>" in the ORIGINAL DEST column. -Tom ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: [PATCH] Another iptables-save buglet Date: Wednesday 14 September 2005 15:09 From: Tom Eastep <teastep@shorewall.net> To: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org The conntrack

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

http://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 ftp://shorewall.net/pub/shorewall/2.2-Beta/shorewall-2.2.0-Beta2 Problems Corrected: 1. The "shorewall check" command results in the (harmless) error message: /usr/share/shorewall/firewall: line 2753: check_dupliate_zones: command not found 2. The

Shoot! Sorry Tom. I thought I replaced your e-mail address with the shorewall list address. I got it working!!! I finally figured out what I was doing wrong. Pays to write down what I want to accomplish versus flying by the seat mof my pants. The ACCEPT+ is G R E A T! Took care of some of my issues along with removing the redirect rule (yeah, yeah...I should have thought it over more

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As I pointed out to Wilson in a private message, this appears to show that no other connection requests (other than port 3000) are being sent from the client to the server (or at least no other connection requests are being received by the Shorewall box). Wilson: Are you sure that the client is supposed to open port 3001 on the server and not the

I'm running a little web-server under CentOS-5.4 , with shorewall as firewall. I used to get messages about attempted intrusions, with the IP addresses of those attempting to connect. This stopped some time ago, and my logwatch reports now are very bare. I don't recall changing the settings of logwatch or shorewall. Has there been some default change? I should say that I'm not sure

Hi Tom, Many thanks for that, that''s really helped. Netfilter is indeed dropping the packets as invalid. Thanks and regards, Frances -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] Sent: 23 March 2007 18:05 To: Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Expected handling of [SYN] when expecting[SYN, ACK]? Frances Flood wrote: > Basically, if the

Plus I would like to let you know that it works like a charm. Snort can now see those packets. -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Thibodeau, Jamie L. Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:25 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: RE: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline

Thanks for such a quick reply Tom! Any suggestions then as to what I might do other than putting a second nic in the SBS and opening it up for web access? I don''t like the idea, but since MS SBS includes fireall that is actually what MS suggests. Boyd -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:teastep@shorewall.net] Sent: January 3, 2005 3:05 PM To: Shorewall Users Cc: Boyd

No, i did it normally. So it seems a router misconfiguration, doesn`t it? if so, tomorrow i will call the customer support. Glad it is not my fault :-) -- Ciao Nico ----- Messaggio originale ----- Da: "Tom Eastep"<teastep@shorewall.net> Inviato: 07/06/04 20.27.28 A: "Mailing List for Shorewall Users"<shorewall-users@lists.shorewall.net> Oggetto: Re:

Found an error or two from my logwatch report from yesterday, thought I would share this in hopes this is just first time run of the problem I noticed in the Kernel report section... Also not sure why there's an issue with automount either.... but I guess I could ask on that issue as well. I am not worried about the NAMED error, this is something that happens due to one of the services that

In policy $FW Net ACCEPT Dump.rar join THX -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2006 21:22 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Help with multiISP + squid& squidguard... Joffrey FLEURICE wrote: > > >

Yessssssssssssssssssss !! THANKSS it Works !!!! Thanks a lot, if you come to Lille,France I''ll Offer you a big Beer) Joffrey -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 19 octobre 2006 21:46 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tcrules

In policy : -----Message d''origine----- De : shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net] De la part de Tom Eastep Envoyé : jeudi 12 octobre 2006 21:22 À : Shorewall Users Objet : Re: [Shorewall-users] Tc rules Help with multiISP + squid& squidguard... Joffrey FLEURICE wrote: > > > All works, but no surf with

You are awesome!!!! -----Original Message----- From: shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net [mailto:shorewall-users-bounces@lists.shorewall.net] On Behalf Of Tom Eastep Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:11 AM To: Mailing List for Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Shorewall and an inline IDS (snort-inlineorhogwash) Tom Eastep wrote: > Thibodeau, Jamie L. wrote: >

Why ping google ??? you should either ping your assigned external ip address ( make your config dhcp for your external ip address even if it is static ) ( If your dsl link is up you sould have an address if not you should not ) If for some reson you cannot do that, ping your isp''s default gw or someone closer. With google you never know what is going on. I do something similar with -m