similar to: Where to find OpenSSH patch for CVE-2020-14145

On 10/30/20 4:51 PM, Pawel Winogrodzki wrote: > Hello, > > We are currently trying to apply a patch to our 8.0p1 version of OpenSSH for CVE-2020-14145<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14145>. The "patch" tag from NIST's web page links to the 8.3p1 vs 8.4p1 comparison<https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/compare/V_8_3_P1...V_8_4_P1> on GitHub. Is

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X012 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 2eb1022ec7ec2d508248c9c152e253aa72acfa08a155701d2791b1458766590a e1000e-2.5.4-3.4.68.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X011 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 0ca23e081ddc488aa22b357fd2ad46b26526424f4613f5af7254bcbdcbcf1474 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.55.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X009 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- b46a8cc4391424f463aec8e81e716152357426ae3601857b2661bc5a1257f9b3 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.43.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

Thanks for the analysis of second bug. Please also share CVSSv3 score for first bug. Arjit Kumar On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Andrew Bartlett <abartlet at samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:36 +0530, Arjit Gupta via samba wrote: > > Hi Team, > > > > Please let me know the severity of CVE-2017-2619 and CVE-2017-7494. > > They are not unpublished:

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X018 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 2ac8f3b6799eac04c6fc5fe054a68d00bdf914f173087a7802c9bce8b4366e48 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.25.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:36 +0530, Arjit Gupta via samba wrote: > Hi Team, > > Please let me know the severity of CVE-2017-2619 and CVE-2017-7494. They are not unpublished: https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2017-2619.html https://www.samba.org/samba/security/CVE-2017-7494.html For this second bug, I did some work on CVSS scores: I've had a go at a CVSSv3 score for the

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:0620-01 Important (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: a8a913de2ce129fe28c1015d2be0ca72acbb70eb7b4e41ef470f8fdc3d70c6ad kernel-3.4.50-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm b01179ca3023f3f3503fe71f8efbdecee9f01f6be552c2a35c91909fe652574f

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2013:X002 Important (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- kernel-3.4.53-8.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm: a9dcd1ef0417ed31aad7642b1f5a028e8ad69a11382640b4442059ba1d9ccc23

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2014:X005 (Xen4CentOS) The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) ----------------------------- X86_64 ----------------------------- 4d780927c1273021f707954531d4f8363f96001a09101ac3b828c02dcf640fc5 e1000e-2.5.4-3.10.29.2.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.rpm

http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-1692 The NIST advisory says that all versions of OpenSSH potentially contain the flaw. ?But is that really true? ?For example, I looked at the 3.8.1p1 distribution and didn't find any reference to JPAKE at all. Thanks.

<no_spam_98 <at> yahoo.com> writes: > > http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2014-1692 > > The NIST advisory says that all versions of OpenSSH potentially contain > the flaw. ?But is that really true? ?For example, I looked at the > 3.8.1p1 distribution and didn't find any reference to JPAKE at all. Hi. The NVD advisory is inaccurate. JPAKE

Hi I am wondering if this has made it into any updates? http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2010-4645 thanks

Dear R-core, I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40, EPEL9 and EPEL8, so no problem there. However, F38 and F39 will stay at v4.3.3, and I was wondering if there's a specific patch available, or if you could point me to the commits that fixed the issue, so that we can cherry-pick them for F38 and F39. Thanks.

svn diff -c 86235 ~/r-devel/R (or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily backported. (CC Luke in case there is more to it) - pd > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at fedoraproject.org> wrote: > > Dear R-core, > > I just received notification of CVE-2024-27322 [1] in RedHat's Bugzilla. We > updated R to v4.4.0 in Fedora rawhide, F40,

On 30 April 2024 at 11:59, peter dalgaard wrote: | svn diff -c 86235 ~/r-devel/R Which is also available as https://github.com/r-devel/r-svn/commit/f7c46500f455eb4edfc3656c3fa20af61b16abb7 Dirk | (or 86238 for the port to the release branch) should be easily backported. | | (CC Luke in case there is more to it) | | - pd | | > On 30 Apr 2024, at 11:28 , I?aki Ucar <iucar at