similar to: IPSec pass through

Buf ... Solved. Problem was that /etc/pam.d/racoon doesn't exists (I found this tip on NetBSD ipsec pages). Simply I have copied /etc/pam.d/passwd to /etc/pam.d/racoon and now all works as expected. Many thanks for your help Ross. Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > I think it might just use another one like /etc/pam.d/remote > cause I audited the package and it wasn't there.

It seems to me that ipsecnat tunnel type is not complete. Latest drafts of ipsec nat-traversal use udp port 4500 for nat-traversal communications. (It''s called port floating). That is needed to get rid of ugly ipsec passthru devices. Now ipsecnat opens port udp/500 from any source port. And I think ipsecnat won''t work at all with gw zone defined? I''m not sure about

I have problems connecting IPSEC VPN clients on the masqueraded network to outside VPN servers. It looks like this: ipsec-user | 192.168.1.10 (DHCP assigned) | | 192.168.1.1 fw-1 (shorewall, Linux 2.6) | 20.20.20.20 (internet) | 30.30.30.30 fw-2 (IPSEC VPN endpoint) | 192.168.100.1 | | 192.168.100.2 server ipsec-user (a road warrior) is supposed to create an IPSEC tunnel to his home

Hi, I am trying to setup ipsec tunnel between Freebsd (host1) and Linux (host2) systems.And I also interested in executing some ipsec test cases( Like TAHI conformance test suite) on the same connection. Please, suggest me some details regarding this setup and Specify any materials which can be obtained from from any locations(site).. I have enabled IPSec support for FreeBSD (4.11 Release) and

Shorewall version 2.0.3C Does anyone know where i might be able to get a RPM version of IPSEC for Linux Kernel -smp 2.4.20-31.9 ? I currently have IPSEC version 2.06 running on a Redhat Linux 9.0 box with kernel 2.4.20-6smp just fine. But whenever i attempt to upgrade the Kernel to the latest one mentioned above, IPSEC fails to startup properly and displays multiple error messages. I Checked

Hello Mailinglist, please excuse my bad english - but I am not a native speaker. My Network looks like this: Internet --- dyn. IP --- Firewall (shorewall) --- LAN (192.168.X.X) No I try to connect my iphone (from mobile Internet G3) over VPN (l2tp/ipsec) with the firewall. But I can´t open the necessary Port 1701. /var/log/syslog ... Dec 30 00:24:29 router kernel: [226128.293757]

Hey First, apologies if this went out twice. I sent the original email from an odd email configuration (essentially from an alias of what I signed up as). I searched and noticed that my post did not appear and I did not get a bounce back so I was confused. I waited a few days before resending. So apologies if this goes out twice. I am not trying to spam. I was hoping someone could help me with

Hi all, I want to allocate bandwidth for ipsec interface using CBQ/tc. Suppose the conf. file is like this, DEVICE=ipsec0,10Mbit,1Mbit RATE=128Kbit WEIGHT=10Kbit PRIO=5 RULE=192.128.1.0/24 Does it work or What else options need to be taken care like ipsec packets/protocol/port # etc.? C''d anybody suggest please? regds, Srikanth. _______________________________________________ LARTC

Hi, Just seeking some clarification on the current state of play with masqing ipsec connections. I have a client who establishs many different outbound ipsec connections. So thats - many local clients, through linux firewall, to many different ipsec ''servers''. they currently assign a public ip for outbound nat to each user to connect out to the ipsec connection, so we have a one

Hi! I''m testing IPSec tunnels, having the following test schemma: Host A - eth0: 192.168.1.67 eth1: 192.168.10.1 Host B - eth0: 192.168.1.254 eth1: 192.168.20.1 I''ve succesfully configured an IPSec tunnel in order to safely communicate from 192.168.10.0/24 (which is obviously behind Host A), and 192.168.20.0/24 (obviously behind Host B) In this test

> -----Original Message----- > From: Greg Panula [mailto:greg.panula@dolaninformation.com] > Sent: 12 May 2003 11:10 > To: Matthew Braithwaite > Cc: stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: iHEADS UP: ipsec packet filtering change > > You don't really need the gif tunnels for ipsec. Gif is more geared > towards ipv4 <=> ipv6 type tunnels. A few of ipsec

Hi, I have FreeBSD box with network interface having y.y.y.y ip address. On same box i configure next ipsec ploicys to process trafic from hardware ipsec enabled device. spdadd 0.0.0.0/0 x.x.x.x/24 any -P out ipsec esp/tunnel/y.y.y.y-z.z.z.z/require; spdadd x.x.x.x/24 0.0.0.0/0 any -P in ipsec esp/tunnel/z.z.z.z-y.y.y.y/require; Is it possible to see decrypted incoming packets, and outgoing

I have the task to make an IPsec tunnel between a Cisco router and a Linux router. The people that have set the Cisco router have sent me this (Cisco) config file, but that doesn''t help me a lot since I don''t understand nor ipsec nor Cisco syntax that well. So, can anyone help me to make the ipsec configuration? Second, what''s better to use ipsec-tools or isakmpd on

Hi, This issue might be a slightly offtopic, but someone might have experience with it. Thanks for reading this post anyway. I have the following setup: Network 10.227.7.X is connected over a wlan (172.1.1.1 <-> 172.1.1.2) to network 128.1.1.X. This setup works, I have cross-subnet browsing going and I am able to login. When I enable IPSEC (raccoon (linux <-> freebsd)) I am still

On Sun, 23 Feb 2003 09:47:05 -0800, "Sam Leffler" <sam@errno.com> said: > >> Add a new config option IPSEC_FILTERGIF to control whether or not >> packets coming out of a GIF tunnel are re-processed by ipfw, >> et. al. By default they are not reprocessed. With the option they >> are. > > This may affect your ipfw/ipf rules. If you are happy with

Hello, After I''ve switched from 2.1.6 to 2.1.11 I could not run Xserver (TCP 6000) over ipsec anymore, so I''ve reinstalled 2.1.6. Is it a bug or configuration issue? The error is: Shorewall:net2all:DROP: IN=eth0 OUT=eth1 MAC=00:50:da:2d:c1:6c:00:0c:31:f6:c4:8d:08:00 SRC=192.168.123.150 DST=192.168.1.2 LEN=48 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=62 ID=36507 CE PROTO=TCP SPT=35069 DPT=6000

While I have concentrated on support for 2.6 native IPSEC in release 2.2.0, I am still of the opinion that unless you absolutely need IPSEC compatibility that OpenVPN is a much easier (and in the case of roadwarriors, a much better) solution. Having already generated all of the required X.509 certificates, it took me less than 1/2 hr to replace my IPSEC testbed with an OpenVPN one using the new

Hi, Does anyone have experience using IPSEC on CentOS in order to connect to vendor IPSEC-based VPN products (specifically Checkpoint FW1) ? Is the included IPSEC implementation sufficient, or do people have to rely on OpenSWAN or FreeSWAN ? I'd be testing tomorrow and I'm interested with experiences others have had and things to look out for. Thanks in advance, -- dag wieers, dag

I am attempting to create an ipsec tunnel between two CentOS 5.1 systems, network-to-network with two different 192.168.xxx.0/24 LAN segments. I have gone through the documentation on the centos web site, and have the machines to the point where the /var/log/messages show ``IPsec-SA established'' on both machines after runnig ``ifup ipsec0'' (same ipsec0 on each machine). IP

Hello, it looks like the usual way to do ipsec on centos5 won't work anymore on centos6 I installed ipsec-tools but an interface type IPsec is not recognized by the kernel ifup ipsec0 Device does not seem to be present, delaying initialization. I am not planning to use the awful OpenSwan, I Want to sue the Kame implementation which was working fine on CentOS5 any hints ? thank you