similar to: I''ve Writtens a Howto - QoS on Shorewall

Can you push this to a repo somewhere? I want to see what the final version looks like after all your changes, but it's hard to see that with these patches. On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > Adds support for the new TIC layout that's present on Maxwell GPUs, > heavily based on

R Help List -- I have defined two time-series-vector-valued-functions, let them be f and g, and want to find the numeric derivative of f with respect to the variable x where f depends on x through g: (d/dx)(f (g(x) ) Moreover, x is a vector I tried this out the long way (naming every element of the x vector and then making the 'theta' argument in numericDeriv() the character vector of

Hello *! My trafficshaping (tc-htb) drops packets very early, at least i suspect this. It drops about 30% fo the packets. The traffic-generating appication is running locally on the shaping host. I think i can lower this rate by increasing the packet-buffer, because the locally application will slow down with increasing buffer (tcp/ip). But i can´t find any options for that, i cycled the manual

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Adds support for the new TIC layout that's present on Maxwell GPUs, heavily based on the code for the existing layout. This code is required for GM20x support. While GM10x supports the older layout still, this commit switches it to use the updated version instead. Piglit testing shows zero regressions on GM107. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs

On 02/16/2016 03:47 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Can you push this to a repo somewhere? I want to see what the final > version looks like after all your changes, but it's hard to see that > with these patches. https://github.com/skeggsb/Mesa/commits/master > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Ben Skeggs <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: >> From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at

Dear list, I have experimented some time now with HTB queues, and have received a lot of help from this list, especially from Stef. Thank you. My currect Shaper looks like this: http://www.designobjekt.de/test/rc.trafficshaper Unfortunately I still experience lags of this type: -players from the internet playing on my server feel lags -I feel lags when I play on a different server on the

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> --- src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/g80_defs.xml.h | 279 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 279 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/g80_defs.xml.h diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/g80_defs.xml.h

Hello, I am trying wondershaper-1.1a on a friend''s pppoe connection on her Linux box. There are a few things I don''t understand. 1. She has pppoe connection so should DEV=eth0 or DEV=ppp0 ? 2. Her ISP just says on her payment bill that the speed is 128kbps, but doesn''t mention any downlink/uplink speed, so in that case what should be, DOWNLINK= and UPLINK= ? 3. She

Hello, i´ve installed a Suse 8.1 minimal System with iproute 2.4.7 and iptables, Suse default Kernel 2.4.19. When I start the Wondershaper 1.1a Script I get the following Error: CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 72: allot: command not found CBQ: "allot" is required to set WRR parameters. /home/skripte/./wshaper: line 78: allot:

Hi, first of all, let me thank you for your great Shoreline Firewall. I use it with great success at home (protecting my WiFi connection). And now if I could have a question about traffic shaping. I did read everything I could find but I still have two problems: first, the MARK from tcrules is not working in HTB based simple tc filter line ("handle $MARK fw classid 1:20"). If I switch

I have been testing wondershaper 1.1a with htb. DOWNLINK=2304 UPLINK=1024 DEV=wlan0 No other changes have been made, except to comment out the 2 lines to allow the script to run. When I do a speed test from sites like www.toast.net/performance, I only get speeds equal to my UPLINK speed. I expected a speed closer to the DOWNLINK. Am I missing something here? TIA, -- -Wes Hegge Technical

Hi group, first of all: I am new to this group and hope to bring in some value later. At the moment I am such a beginner that I will probably of no use to anyone and only be asking stupid questions... I am running a little private linux server with kernel 2.4.21. It serves as a gameserver, webserver and mailserver, mainly. It also does the pppoe connect via a DSL modem to my provider and the NAT

Hi All, I''m using iptables-1.2.7a on RedHat8 kernel 2.4.20. I wanted to limit the file-sharing traffic to the internet. I marked the packets with iptables: iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d ! 192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1024:1862 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -A FORWARD -t mangle -p tcp -s 192.168.1.1/24 -d ! 192.168.1.1/24 --dport 1864:65535 -j MARK --set-mark 1

Hello everyone. I''ve been trying to get Qos to work here for two days now, but it REALLY doesn''t seem to work the way I want to. Here is my situation: Internet Wireless LAN Firewall DMZ Local lan As you can see, I got a Debian box in the middle as my firewall with 3 network interfaces and a wireless one. I use

Hmm--either the indexing process is still running, or it''s broken again. It''s 0443 GMT, and I can''t get the search engine to find anything on the mailing list or the web site (I used ''dns'' as my search term). It''s not that big of an inconvenience, though--Googling for ''site:shorewall.net dns'' does pretty much the same thing.

Previously we were treating any indirect temp array usage to mean that everything should end up in lmem. The MemoryOpt pass would clean a lot of that up later, but in the meanwhile we would lose a lot of opportunity for optimization. This helps a lot of Metro 2033 Redux and a handful of KSP shaders: total instructions in shared programs : 6288373 -> 6261517 (-0.43%) total gprs used in shared

Hi Guys, I''m asking this question again because I have exhausted resources for understanding how to get it to work. I''ve read the howto on getting traffic shaping to work (shorewall''s web site) as well as trying out wondershaper''s htb and cbq scripts. Somehow both does not seem to happen as I want it to. I''ve also read through the lartc

Spinning off from another topic...what are people using for QoS / Shaping? I'm using Wondershaper script with OK results...but I'd like better. Ideas? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20091008/96b14a3e/attachment.htm

Hi ! I found an excellent article about QoS and traffic shaping for VoIP (Asterisk IAX protocol), which is designed to improve sound quality even over very busy lines. http://www.howtoforge.com/voip_qos_traffic_shaping_iproute2_asterisk Should I just cut and paste all that to shorewall''s tcrules (replacing 4569 with 5060)? Additionally, author of this article uses IAX protocol,

Hello, I'm looking for a (relatively) simple way to help shape upload connections on my firewall box (CentOS 4 + iptables). Does anyone know of any packages, other than wondershaper, that do this? thanks!