similar to: qemu-kvm-ev: usb: out-of-bounds r/w(CVE-2020-14364)

I have reported on bugzilla, link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1943399; But this seems to only support ovirt. Then?opened an issue on CentOS community;link: https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=18131; Thanks. jasonrao From: centos-virt-request Date: 2021-03-16 20:00 To: centos-virt Subject: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 159, Issue 2 Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to

UPDATE: It turned out QEMU still dumped core with that patch applied. That said, I'm still interested to know how to report issues with QEMU from centos-virt repo. Thanks, Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: Xiong, Huan > Sent: 2018?6?22? 11:12 > To: 'centos-virt at centos.org' <centos-virt at centos.org> > Subject: Q: how can I request to add an upstream

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=21119> is now available for testing. I'm testing it right now in oVirt CI, if nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release in a few hours. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jan 04 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.9.0-16.el7_4.13.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Thu

On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote: > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable, > >> it points to altarch for x86_64 $basearch. > > > > can't reproduce on a fresh x86_64 installation. Adding Brian in case he has > > a clue for this. > > I use fresh installed x86_64 CentOS 7.5 via VNC > with

2018-05-15 14:39 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net>: > On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:18:08 +0200 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> > wrote: > > > >> I have freshly installed CentOS 7.5 on a Dell server, and > > >> /etc/yum/vars/contentdir > > >> contains 'altarch' too. CentOS 7.4->7.5 upgraded servers

2018-05-15 14:16 GMT+02:00 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com>: > > > 2018-05-15 13:53 GMT+02:00 Nerijus Baliunas <nerijus at users.sourceforge.net > >: > >> On Tue, 15 May 2018 14:45:23 +0300 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com> wrote: >> >> > >> Something wrong with $contentdir variable, >> > >> it points to altarch

2018-05-15 12:38 GMT+02:00 Gena Makhomed <gmm at csdoc.com>: > Hello, Sandro! > > On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote: > > failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more >> mirrors to try. >> http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/ >> repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found >> > >

I see with the introduction of CentOS 7.5 there's a new qemu-kvm-ma package on ppc64le (which is actually newer than qemu-kvm-ev currently). Does anyone know what the difference is between these two packages? We currently use qemu-kvm-ev and we've run into this bug [1] which got me wondering if we should be switching to that package on ppc64le. Thanks! [1]

Hello, Sandro! On 11.05.2018 12:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > Sadly, the new qemu-kvm-ev we prepared for CentOS 7.5 didn't get released ( > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14764) but the new build is ready. After installing CentOS 7.5 and installing package qemu-kvm-ev I can't install KVM on x86_64 arch: command "yum -y install perf qemu-kvm-ev qemu-kvm-tools-ev

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1 <https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=17495> has been tagged for release and will soon be available on CentOS mirrors. This release addresses a security issue (CVE-2017-7718) which has a security impact rated important. See https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhsa-announce/2017-June/msg00014.html for more details on this update. Here's the

Hi, qemu-kvm-ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 has been tagged for testing. If nothing shows up, I'll tag it for release on Monday July 2nd. Here's the changelog: * Thu Jun 28 2018 Sandro Bonazzola <sbonazzo at redhat.com> - ev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4.1 - Removing RH branding from package name * Sat Jun 09 2018 Miroslav Rezanina <mrezanin at redhat.com> - rhev-2.10.0-21.el7_5.4 -

Hi, We're using qemu-kvm-ev on ppc64le and I've noticed that it's included in the extras repo for ppc64le but in the qemu-kvm-ev repo for x86_64. I also noticed the version in ppc64le is lagging behind x86. I see that ppc64le is being built for this, however isn't tagged for virt7-kvm-common-release and thus showing up under /virt/kvm-common on the mirrors. Is there any

How long does last week's security update remain in the test repo before it gets moved to release? Rgs Neil Wilson

Hello! http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common Latest is now qemu-kvm-ev-2.6.0-28.el7.10.1.x86_64.rpm while http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHEV/SRPMS/ has qemu-kvm-rhev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.12.src.rpm A few questions: A) Does kvm-common have RPM builds from RHEV's SRPMS? B) Is the plan to keep kvm-common up to date with RHEV? // Johan Guldmyr

Hi folks, I'm proposing to cancel the Virt SIG meeting on December 26th due to Holidays. If you're aware of anything important we have to discuss next week, please do reply to this mail. Thanks! -- SANDRO BONAZZOLA ASSOCIATE MANAGER, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EMEA ENG VIRTUALIZATION R&D Red Hat EMEA <https://www.redhat.com/> <https://red.ht/sig> TRIED. TESTED. TRUSTED.

Hi All, I'm interested in contributing to Virt-SIG with packages focused on Hyper-V/Azure support, i.e. kernel packages with additional patches and build configurations tuned for Hyper-V. There are some advantages these packages can bring to CentOS users - - Access to the latest features and fixes - Reduced boot time - Smaller memory footprint Of course all the new features/fixes are

FYI, I won't be around for the Virt SIG meetings on 21 August or 4 September. Does anyone want to step up and chair those, or should we just take a summer holiday and cancel them? -George

Just saw this: ================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================ Updating: ansible noarch 2.9.1-2.el7 ovirt-4.3-centos-ovirt43 17 M which seems new. No longer pulling ansible from

On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 04:54:54PM +0200, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > 2017-08-13 13:50 GMT+02:00 C. L. Martinez <carlopmart at gmail.com>: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am trying to install oVirt 4.1.x from centos repos but it seems > > ovirt-engine doesn't exists. But instead, ovirt-hosted-engine-setup > > exists? > > > > Is ovirt-engine

Hi, All There is following issue in latest libvirt-4.5.0-10.el7_6.12 package, which could prevent live VM migrations with web sockets enabled, when libvirtd were restarted prior to migration. Environment: # uname -a Linux inv-cp1-hv3-centos7 3.10.0-957.12.2.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue May 14 21:24:32 UTC 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810