similar to: Just need a simple pop3 & smtp access. It''s not working! :(

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Remember my thread that I can''t FTP into my server? It seems that (well, what Tom has suggested) ip_conntrack_ftp and ip_nat_ftp weren''t loaded. I don''t know why in that particular machine mdk9.2 doesn''t load them by default, whereas in other machine they were loaded. I have put them in /etc/modules, and

I'm having trouble getting port forwarding working on my one box. I have 2 incoming internet connections. I have 2 servers on these connections. pubinternet privinternet eth0:x.x.x.x eth0:y.y.y.y eth1:10.10.10.1 eth1:10.10.10.4 I need to be able to port forward traffic

Dear List i have upgrade my * box with the latest CVS version of Asterisk Stable 1.0 and zaptel/libpri my system is MDK9.2 with 1 TE410P and seems work well for now but i have a little amount of traffic (25 IN/OUT calls) i only notice this Warning.. What kind of error is? ------------------------------- Apr 20 21:28:49 WARNING[147466]: chan_zap.c:5979 zt_pri_error: PRI: !! Got reject for

Hi, I have a curious trouble with Dreamweaver2 using wine (20020804). My system is Mdk9.0 on a Dell Latitude C840. The installed system was W$XP. I can't get Wine right with it (but it is a NTFS partition (and I don't want to spend time reinstalling Window$)). Dreamweaver2 worked on my other computer with Mdk09.0, so I did a copy of windows directory and Program Files\Macromedia\* to

Hi, Is there a sure way to test 2 cd's if they are true copies in rsync. I have tried this... rsync -avv /mnt/cdrom/ /mnt/cdrom2 ** result....quite shotened... misc/rpm2header is uptodate pkg-9.2-FiveStar-download-i586.idx is uptodate total: matches=0 tag_hits=0 false_alarms=0 data=0 wrote 65301 bytes read 20 bytes 1789.62 bytes/sec total size is 679261427 speedup is 10398.82 ** Is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dear all, I have this in my /var/log/messages (pls mind the line wrap): smbd3[3660]: [2004/07/09 15:31:26, 0] rpc_server/srv_util.c:get_domain_user_groups(372) smbd3[3660]: get_domain_user_groups: primary gid of user [fajar] is not a Domain group ! smbd3[3660]: get_domain_user_groups: You should fix it, NT doesn't like that Why is that?

I don''t think this has anything to do with Shorewall but I am not too familiar with iptables stuff yet so I''m not sure. Running Shorewall shorewall-1.4.9 on Mandrake Linux release 9.2 (FiveStar) for i586 Kernel 2.4.22-37mdk. Run "nmap -sP 192.168.x.x/24" (for example), where 192.168.x.x/24 is the LAN. You can do this from a firewall/router, or even from a

Hello! I recently upgraded my computer from Mandrake 8.2 to Mandrake 9.0. I used a very slightly modifed WonderShaper and it worked beautifully. But now when I try to run the same cbq shaping script on Mandrake 9.0 i get this output RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory RTNETLINK answers: No such file or

Hi, I installed the shorewall 1.3.8-2 debian package to my debian testing machine which serves as the gateway to the internet. Since I have two other machine connect to internet thru this gateway machine, I also downloaded the configuration guide for "basic two-interface firewall" and followed the instructions. When I try to start the shorewall I get the following message and can not

Hi everyone. I am so baffled by the following problem: Office 1 is using ADSL and it is building a VPN tunnel with IPSEC to Office 2. Both ends are using shorewall/freeswan firewalls. Diagram: Office1 fw --- VPN TUNNEL --- Office2 fw --- cisco router ----- VLANS | DMZ Office 1 has the following interfaces: 2: eth0:

Hi. I have a Server''s network with some servers in it, all with 192.168.1.0/25 ips. There is also a router in that network with ip 192.168.1.1. This router also connected to a client''s network 10.10.0.0/16 with ip 10.10.100.1. All services on each server are given their virtual address from one of two virtual networks 192.168.1.128/28 and 192.168.1.144/28. 192.168.1.128/28 is

Dear all: Im using shorewall 2.0.3a (debian) w/ ULOG. shorewall starts ok, and the firewall is running, but nothing is printed on the logs. I try, for example, to do a connection to a port that is opened on the server but closed by the FW and I get a connection refused. If I stop the firewall, this port is accesible from the outside. I think I''ve followed all the steps on

Hi All, I wonder can I do NAT+mangle+tc on same maschine? I want to shape outgoing traffic per IP on my gateway computer. Regards Emil Terziev _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Hello, I tried Shorewall for the first time today. I am currently using an up-to-date installation of Debian Sid, which has shorewall 4.2.10, shorewall-shell 4.2.10 and shorewall-perl 4.2.10.1. I noticed that even though I had the following /etc/shorewall/policy file, iptables would still show LOG rules at the end of the INPUT and OUTPUT chains instead of ULOG rules. (Other logging related rules

Hi All, I am facing a problem when using ULOG daemon and SNORT (inline mode) with iptables. My set up is like this. 1. I need ULOG daemon to log firewall logs to MYSQL database. 2. I need SNORT in inline mode for intrusion prevention. Both can work fine induvidually with iptables. But ULOG daemon cannot work when SNORT is also running. Probably the reason is that snort also hooks to

I have a three interface network (net,loc,dmz). The internet interface (eth0) has a static IP. Windows machine in the local network (eth1) use DHCP to get IPs from the 192.168.10.0/24 netblock. The Debian machine in the DMZ (eth2) gets a fixed IP through DHCP in the 192.168.11.0/24 netblock. The DHCP server is running on the firewall machine (not ideal, I know, but that''s the way

--==========1943392778========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Here''s another little patch that corrects a couple of silly mistakes. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.sf.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net --==========1943392778==========

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748 Summary: Range check for ulog-cprange is wrong Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy:

Hi, I''m using following rule in /etc/shorewall/rules REJECT:ULOG:P2P loc net ipp2p:all ipp2p iptables -L : Chain loc2net (1 references) target prot opt source destination ACCEPT all -- anywhere anywhere state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ULOG all -- anywhere anywhere ipp2p v0.8.2--ipp2p ULOG

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62 Summary: I patched the iptables-restore and liblptulog for string included "," " Product: iptables userspace Version: 1.2.7a Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2